World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
76
Citations
19268
World Ranking
1220
National Ranking
527

Mark R. Schoeberl publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Schoeberl sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 375 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mark R. Schoeberl D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Schoeberl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1995 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Mark R. Schoeberl is affiliated with Science and Technology Corporation in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions in Environmental Science. Within these fields, their work extensively covers Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Climate variability and models
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Their publication record shows frequent contributions to several key journals with multiple articles published in:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (9 publications)
  • Geophysical Research Letters (3 publications)
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (2 publications)
  • Earth and Space Science (2 publications)
  • Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development (1 publication)

Mark R. Schoeberl has been a coauthor with various researchers, collaborating most frequently with:

  • Rei Ueyama (10 publications)
  • Ghassan Taha (8 publications)
  • Yi Wang (7 publications)
  • E. J. Jensen (5 publications)
  • Wandi Yu (5 publications)

Recent papers authored by Schoeberl include:

  • "Analysis and Impact of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Stratospheric Water Vapor Plume" (2022) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "The Cross Equatorial Transport of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Eruption Plume" (2023) in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "Cloud and Aerosol Distributions From SAGE III/ISS Observations" (2021) in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Other notable papers included in their record with different lead authors but relevant to the field are:

  • "Global Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed?" (2025) published in Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
  • "Tracking aerosols and SO 2 clouds from the Raikoke eruption: 3D view from satellite observations" (2021) in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Mark R. Schoeberl holds distinctions as a Fellow of both the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1996 and the American Geophysical Union (AGU) since 1995.

Best Publications

  • Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011

    Gloria L. Manney;Gloria L. Manney;Michelle L. Santee;Markus Rex;Nathaniel J. Livesey

  • An objective determination of the polar vortex using Ertel's potential vorticity

    Eric R. Nash;Paul A. Newman;Joan E. Rosenfield;Mark R. Schoeberl

  • Nimbus 7 satellite measurements of the springtime Antarctic ozone decrease

    R. S. Stolarski;A. J. Krueger;M. R. Schoeberl;R. D. McPeters

  • Overview of the EOS aura mission

    M.R. Schoeberl;A.R. Douglass;E. Hilsenrath;P.K. Bhartia

  • The structure of the polar vortex

    Mark R. Schoeberl;Leslie R. Lait;Paul A. Newman;Joan E. Rosenfield

  • Stratospheric water vapor feedback

    A. E. Dessler;M. R. Schoeberl;T. Wang;S. M. Davis;S. M. Davis

  • The dynamics of the stratospheric polar vortex and its relation to springtime ozone depletions

    Mark R. Schoeberl;Dennis L. Hartmann

  • Airborne lidar observations in the wintertime Arctic stratosphere: Polar stratospheric clouds

    E. V. Browell;C. F. Butler;S. Ismail;P. A. Robinette

  • Transport of smoke from Canadian forest fires to the surface near Washington, D.C.: Injection height, entrainment, and optical properties

    P. R. Colarco;M. R. Schoeberl;B. G. Doddridge;L. T. Marufu

  • Stratospheric Warmings: Observations and Theory

    Mark R. Schoeberl

  • Where did tropospheric ozone over southern Africa and the tropical Atlantic come from in October 1992? Insights from TOMS, GTE TRACE A, and SAFARI 1992

    A. M. Thompson;K. E. Pickering;D. P. McNamara;M. R. Schoeberl

  • On the formation and persistence of subvisible cirrus clouds near the tropical tropopause

    Eric J. Jensen;Owen B. Toon;Henry B. Selkirk;James D. Spinhirne

  • Monthly mean global climatology of temperature, wind, geopotential height, and pressure for 0 - 120 km

    Sushil Chandra;Eric L. Fleming;Mark R. Schoeberl;John J. Barnett

  • Transport out of the lower stratospheric Arctic vortex by Rossby wave breaking

    D. W. Waugh;R. A. Plumb;R. J. Atkinson;M. R. Schoeberl

  • Computations of diabatic descent in the stratospheric polar vortex

    Joan E. Rosenfield;Paul A. Newman;Mark R. Schoeberl

  • Chlorine chemistry on polar stratospheric cloud particles in the arctic winter.

    C. R. Webster;R. D. May;D. W. Toohey;L. M. Avallone

  • Intrusions into the lower stratospheric Arctic vortex during the winter of 1991–1992

    R. A. Plumb;D. W. Waugh;R. J. Atkinson;P. A. Newman

  • Chemical loss of ozone in the Arctic polar vortex in the winter of 1991- 1992

    R. J. Salawitch;S. C. Wofsy;E. W. Gottlieb;L. R. Lait

  • A comparison of the lower stratospheric age spectra derived from a general circulation model and two data assimilation systems

    Mark R. Schoeberl;Anne R. Douglass;Zhengxin Zhu;Steven Pawson

  • Interhemispheric differences in springtime production of HCl and ClONO2 in the polar vortices

    Anne R. Douglass;Mark R. Schoeberl;Richard S. Stolarski;J. W. Waters

  • The Zonally Averaged Circulation of the Middle Atmosphere

    Mark R. Schoeberl;Darrell F. Strobel

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Newman
Paul Newman Goddard Space Flight Center
Anne R. Douglass
Anne R. Douglass Goddard Space Flight Center
Leslie R. Lait
Leslie R. Lait Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard S. Stolarski
Richard S. Stolarski Johns Hopkins University
Andrew E. Dessler
Andrew E. Dessler Texas A&M University
Max Loewenstein
Max Loewenstein Ames Research Center
Edward V. Browell
Edward V. Browell Langley Research Center
Joe W. Waters
Joe W. Waters Jet Propulsion Lab
Arlin J. Krueger
Arlin J. Krueger Goddard Space Flight Center
Lucien Froidevaux
Lucien Froidevaux California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences often opens doors to diverse career paths, including public administration, social research, and education. For those seeking leadership roles in environmental policy or nonprofit organizations, pursuing the best online MPA programs can provide specialized knowledge in public administration with flexible, accelerated options.

Understanding the social dynamics of environmental issues is also crucial. An accredited online bachelors in sociology offers foundational insights into societal behavior and structures, enriching the perspective of future environmental scientists and advocates.

For professionals interested in advancing their education without the lengthy dissertation process, EDD without dissertation programs are increasingly popular. These options allow educators and environmental leaders to gain advanced expertise while balancing work commitments.

Exploring pathways through the best EDS to EDD programs can further enhance credentials for those focused on environmental education and research, combining rigorous academic training with practical application.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Schoeberl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles