World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
83
Citations
21812
World Ranking
850
National Ranking
369

Paul Newman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Newman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 365 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Paul Newman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Newman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Newman is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on several key subfields and topics within atmospheric and environmental sciences.

The main areas of study for Paul Newman include Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Their work concentrates on topics such as Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate variability and models, Polar Research and Ecology, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics.

Paul Newman has a consistent record of publishing in notable scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Geophysical Research Letters, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Newman include:

  • The Remarkably Strong Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex of Winter 2020: Links to Record-Breaking Arctic Oscillation and Ozone Loss (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • The 2019 Southern Hemisphere Stratospheric Polar Vortex Weakening and Its Impacts (2021), Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere (2021), Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Impacts, processes and projections of the quasi-biennial oscillation (2022), Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • The Impact of Continuing CFC-11 Emissions on Stratospheric Ozone (2020), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Collaborations form an important aspect of Paul Newman's research output. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence Coy, Leslie R. Lait, Qing Liang, Amy H. Butler, and M. L. Santee.

Best Publications

  • An objective determination of the polar vortex using Ertel's potential vorticity

    Eric R. Nash;Paul A. Newman;Joan E. Rosenfield;Mark R. Schoeberl

  • Nimbus 7 satellite measurements of the springtime Antarctic ozone decrease

    R. S. Stolarski;A. J. Krueger;M. R. Schoeberl;R. D. McPeters

  • Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past

    V. Eyring;N. Butchart;D. W. Waugh;H. Akiyoshi

  • Record Low Global Ozone in 1992

    J. F. Gleason;P. K. Bhartia;J. R. Herman;R. McPeters

  • The structure of the polar vortex

    Mark R. Schoeberl;Leslie R. Lait;Paul A. Newman;Joan E. Rosenfield

  • What Controls the Temperature of the Arctic Stratosphere During the Spring

    Paul A. Newman;Eric R. Nash;Joan E. Rosenfield

  • The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space

    Pieternel F. Levelt;Joanna Joiner;Johanna Tamminen;J. Pepijn Veefkind

  • Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century

    V. Eyring;D. W. Waugh;G. E. Bodeker;Eugene C. Cordero

  • A new formulation of equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC)

    P. A. Newman;J. S. Daniel;D. W. Waugh;E. R. Nash

  • Uncertainties and assessments of chemistry-climate models of the stratosphere

    J. Austin;D. Shindell;S. R. Beagley;C. Bruhl

  • STATE OF THE CLIMATE IN 2017

    R. Abernethy;Steven A. Ackerman;R. Adler;Adelina Albanil Encarnación

  • Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone and Climate Assessments

    Veronika Eyring;Jean-François Lamarque;Peter Hess;Florian Arfeuille

  • State of the Climate in 2014

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • The Remarkably Strong Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex of Winter 2020: Links to Record-Breaking Arctic Oscillation and Ozone Loss

    Zachary Duane Lawrence;Zachary Duane Lawrence;Judith Perlwitz;Amy Hawes Butler;Gloria L Manney;Gloria L Manney

  • Persistence of the lower stratospheric polar vortices

    Darryn W. Waugh;William J. Randel;Steven Pawson;Paul A. Newman

  • Anomalously low ozone over the Arctic

    Paul A. Newman;James F. Gleason;Richard D. McPeters;Richard S. Stolarski

  • Transport out of the lower stratospheric Arctic vortex by Rossby wave breaking

    D. W. Waugh;R. A. Plumb;R. J. Atkinson;M. R. Schoeberl

  • What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated

    Paul A. Newman;L. D. Oman;A. R. Douglass;E. L. Fleming

  • State of the Climate in 2018

    M. Ades;R. Adler;Laura S. Aldeco;G. Alejandra

  • State of the Climate in 2016

    Arlene P. Aaron-Morrison;Steven A. Ackerman;Nicolaus G. Adams;Robert F. Adler

  • ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols

    S.C. Wofsy;S. Afshar;H.M. Allen;E.C. Apel

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark R. Schoeberl
Mark R. Schoeberl Science and Technology Corporation (United States)
Leslie R. Lait
Leslie R. Lait Goddard Space Flight Center
Richard S. Stolarski
Richard S. Stolarski Johns Hopkins University
Darryn W. Waugh
Darryn W. Waugh Johns Hopkins University
Anne R. Douglass
Anne R. Douglass Goddard Space Flight Center
Steven Pawson
Steven Pawson Goddard Space Flight Center
Luke D. Oman
Luke D. Oman Goddard Space Flight Center
David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Max Loewenstein
Max Loewenstein Ames Research Center
Lawrence Coy
Lawrence Coy Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related online degrees can expand career opportunities and provide specialized skills. Many opt for flexible options like a low cost online general studies degree, which offers an affordable entry point while allowing students to tailor courses toward environmental topics.

Those seeking a program with a manageable workload may consider one of the easiest bachelors degree options. Such programs often emphasize fundamental knowledge and practical skills that complement environmental science studies without overwhelming course demands.

For more technical expertise, a geology online degree offers in-depth understanding of earth processes critical to ecosystem management and resource conservation. Graduates can find roles in environmental consulting, research, and policy.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is highly valuable in environmental careers. Online programs listed under best gis programs teach skills in spatial analysis and mapping, essential for tracking environmental changes and planning sustainable solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Newman

Trending Scientists