World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
14551
World Ranking
1816
National Ranking
763

Max Loewenstein publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Loewenstein sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 199 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Max Loewenstein D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Loewenstein sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Max Loewenstein is affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their research profile currently does not list specific publications, coauthors, or detailed fields of study. However, the association with Ames Research Center, a key NASA research facility, suggests involvement with aerospace research or related scientific domains.

Although no individual recent papers have been documented, Max Loewenstein's work may be shaped within interdisciplinary research environments typical of government research institutions, where collaboration across various scientific and engineering disciplines is common.

There are no recorded frequent coauthors or publication venues connected to their name at this time. This absence of such data may indicate early career status or limited public record of academic publishing available through the source.

The profile does not include a list of main or subfields of study, nor does it specify particular scientific topics researched by Max Loewenstein. Similarly, there are no book publications or awards listed for this scientist, further supporting the conclusion that publicly available research outputs or accolades are either limited or not yet documented.

This profile uses only verified information and refrains from speculation beyond the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Single‐particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere

    J. P. Schwarz;J. P. Schwarz;R. S. Gao;D. W. Fahey;D. W. Fahey;D. S. Thomson;D. S. Thomson

  • Removal of Stratospheric O3 by Radicals: In Situ Measurements of OH, HO2, NO, NO2, ClO, and BrO

    P. O. Wennberg;R. C. Cohen;R. M. Stimpfle;J. P. Koplow

  • In situ measurements of total reactive nitrogen, total water, and aerosol in a polar stratospheric cloud in the Antarctic

    D. W. Fahey;K. K. Kelly;G. V. Ferry;L. R. Poole

  • In situ measurements constraining the role of sulphate aerosols in mid-latitude ozone depletion

    D. W. Fahey;S. R. Kawa;E. L. Woodbridge;P. Tin

  • Particle size distributions in Arctic polar stratospheric clouds, growth and freezing of sulfuric acid droplets, and implications for cloud formation

    James E. Dye;D. Baumgardner;B. W. Gandrud;S. R. Kawa

  • Evaluation of source gas lifetimes from stratospheric observations

    C. M. Volk;James W. Elkins;David W. Fahey;G. S. Dutton

  • Stratospheric Mean Ages and Transport Rates from Observations of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrous Oxide

    K. A. Boering;S. C. Wofsy;B. C. Daube;H. R. Schneider

  • Observations of denitrification and dehydration in the winter polar stratospheres

    D. W. Fahey;K. K. Kelly;S. R. Kawa;A. F. Tuck

  • Kinetics of O3 destruction by ClO and BrO within the Antarctic vortex: An analysis based on in situ ER‐2 data

    J. G. Anderson;W. H. Brune;S. A. Lloyd;D. W. Toohey

  • A barrier to vertical mixing at 14 km in the tropics: Evidence from ozonesondes and aircraft measurements

    Ian Folkins;Max Loewenstein;Jim Podolske;Samuel J. Oltmans

  • Transport out of the lower stratospheric Arctic vortex by Rossby wave breaking

    D. W. Waugh;R. A. Plumb;R. J. Atkinson;M. R. Schoeberl

  • Dehydration in the lower Antarctic stratosphere during late winter and early spring, 1987

    K. K. Kelly;A. F. Tuck;D. M. Murphy;M. H. Proffitt

  • Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder O3 and CO observations in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere

    N. J. Livesey;Mark Filipiak;L. Froidevaux;W. G. Read

  • Ozone loss in the Arctic polar vortex inferred from high-altitude aircraft measurements

    M. H. Proffitt;M. H. Proffitt;J. J. Margitan;K. K. Kelly;M. Loewenstein

  • Mean Ages of Stratospheric Air Derived from in Situ Observations of Co2, Ch4, and N2o

    A. E. Andrews;K. A. Boering;B. C. Daube;S. C. Wofsy

  • Emission Measurements of the Concorde Supersonic Aircraft in the Lower Stratosphere

    D. W. Fahey;E. R. Keim;K. A. Boering;C. A. Brock

  • Quantifying Transport Between the Tropical and Mid-Latitude Lower Stratosphere

    C. M. Volk;James W. Elkins;David W. Fahey;R. J. Salawitch

  • Mixing of polar vortex air into middle latitudes as revealed by tracer-tracer scatterplots

    Darryn Waugh;R A Plumb;J W Elkins;D W Fahey

  • Stratospheric horizontal wavenumber spectra of winds, potential temperature, and atmospheric tracers observed by high-altitude aircraft

    Julio T. Bacmeister;Stephen D. Eckermann;Paul A. Newman;Leslie Lait

  • In‐situ observations of mid‐latitude forest fire plumes deep in the stratosphere

    Hans-Jürg Jost;Katja Drdla;Andreas Stohl;Andreas Stohl;Leonhard Pfister

  • Intrusions into the lower stratospheric Arctic vortex during the winter of 1991–1992

    R. A. Plumb;D. W. Waugh;R. J. Atkinson;P. A. Newman

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
K. R. Chan
K. R. Chan Ames Research Center
James C. Wilson
James C. Wilson University of Denver
James R. Podolske
James R. Podolske Ames Research Center
Ross J. Salawitch
Ross J. Salawitch University of Maryland, College Park
Ru-Shan Gao
Ru-Shan Gao National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Paul Newman
Paul Newman Goddard Space Flight Center
M. H. Proffitt
M. H. Proffitt National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
K. K. Kelly
K. K. Kelly National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Mark R. Schoeberl
Mark R. Schoeberl Science and Technology Corporation (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like dsw programs provide insights into community well-being and social factors, which are crucial for addressing environmental justice issues.

Additionally, some students prefer pursuing a low cost online general studies degree for a flexible, interdisciplinary approach that can incorporate environmental topics with other fields. This path is ideal for those seeking broad knowledge without a narrow specialization.

For those concerned about workload, the easiest bachelor's degree to get listings may help identify accessible programs that still offer valuable credentials related to sustainability and environmental management.

Finally, specialized degrees like the best online geology degree are perfect for students passionate about earth sciences. These programs provide technical knowledge and practical skills to launch careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Max Loewenstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles