World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
7919
World Ranking
2018
National Ranking
855

C. David Levermore publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. David Levermore sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 85 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

C. David Levermore D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. David Levermore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to the understanding of how large-scale behaviors emerge from dynamics or structures on small-scales.

Overview

C. David Levermore is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on research within the broader academic community, though specific details about their recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are not available.

Regarding research topics and fields of study, there is no detailed information on particular subjects, subfields, or thematic areas connected to their work. Therefore, an overview of specific scientific interests cannot be provided.

The scientist has been recognized with the award of SIAM Fellow in 2013. The citation for this award states it was given "For contributions to the understanding of how large-scale behaviors emerge from dynamics or structures on small-scales." This recognition reflects a focus on multiscale phenomena and complex system behavior.

Details concerning books published or a quantified list of scientific publications are not present. Likewise, information about frequent co-authors or established publication venues for their work is not available.

Best Publications

  • Moment Closure Hierarchies for Kinetic Theories

    C. David Levermore

  • Hyperbolic conservation laws with stiff relaxation terms and entropy

    Gui-Qiang Chen;C. David Levermore;Tai-Ping Liu

  • A flux-limited diffusion theory

    Unknown

  • The small dispersion limit of the korteweg‐de vries equation. ii

    Peter D. Lax;C. David Levermore

  • Fluid dynamic limits of kinetic equations II convergence proofs for the boltzmann equation

    Claude Bardos;François Golse;C. David Levermore

  • Numerical Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Stiff Relaxation Terms

    Shi Jin;C.David Levermore

  • Weak and strong solutions of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation

    Charles R. Doering;John D. Gibbon;C. David Levermore

  • Analyticity of Solutions for a Generalized Euler Equation

    C.David Levermore;Marcel Oliver

  • The small dispersion limit of the Korteweg‐de Vries equation. III

    Peter D. Lax;C. David Levermore

  • The Semiclassical Limit of the Defocusing NLS Hierarchy

    Shan Jin;C. David Levermore;David W. McLaughlin

  • The Gaussian moment closure for gas dynamics

    C. David Levermore;William J. Morokoff

  • The Convergence of Numerical Transfer Schemes in Diffusive Regimes I: Discrete-Ordinate Method

    François Golse;Shi Jin;C. David Levermore

  • Finite genus solutions to the Ablowitz‐Ladik equations

    Peter D. Miller;Peter D. Miller;Nicholas M. Ercolani;Igor M. Krichever;C. David Levermore

  • From the Boltzmann Equation to an Incompressible Navier–Stokes–Fourier System

    C. David Levermore;Nader Masmoudi

  • A Cellular Automaton for Burgers' Equation.

    Bruce M. Boghosian;C. David Levermore

  • Stokes-Fourier and Acoustic Limits for the Boltzmann Equation: Convergence Proofs

    François Golse;C. David Levermore;C. David Levermore

  • The Acoustic Limit for the Boltzmann Equation

    Claude Bardos;François Golse;C. David Levermore

  • Discretization methods for one-dimensional Fokker-Planck operators

    E.W Larsen;C.D Levermore;G.C Pomraning;G.C Pomraning;J.G Sanderson

  • The hyperbolic nature of the zero dispersion Kdv limit

    C. David Levermore

  • Long-time effects of bottom topography in shallow water

    Roberto Camassa;Darryl D. Holm;C. David Levermore

  • The Small Dispersion Limit of the Korteweg-deVries Equation. I

    Peter D. Lax;C. David Levermore;Harold Grad;Joe Keller

Frequent Co-Authors

Claude Bardos
Claude Bardos Université Paris Cité
Darryl D. Holm
Darryl D. Holm Imperial College London
Shi Jin
Shi Jin Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Nader Masmoudi
Nader Masmoudi Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
David W. McLaughlin
David W. McLaughlin Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Charles R. Doering
Charles R. Doering University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Irene M. Gamba
Irene M. Gamba The University of Texas at Austin
Robert L. Pego
Robert L. Pego Carnegie Mellon University
Pierre Degond
Pierre Degond Toulouse Mathematics Institute
Christian Schmeiser
Christian Schmeiser University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which can be further enhanced through online degrees. For students looking to expand their expertise into business, exploring the mba transfer credits options can be valuable. This approach allows you to leverage prior coursework while gaining a solid foundation in management.

Data analytics is a rapidly growing field closely linked to mathematics. Enrolling in one of the best masters in data analytics programs enables students to apply mathematical principles to real-world data challenges, significantly enhancing employability.

For those aiming to balance education with a busy lifestyle, selecting from the easiest mba to get into can provide a more accessible path to advancing your career. These programs often value practical experience alongside academics.

Additionally, many students prefer the flexibility offered by the easiest online mba programs to get into, which combine convenience with comprehensive curriculum tailored for working professionals.

Overall, integrating your mathematics background with these strategic online degrees can boost career opportunities across sectors like finance, technology, and management.

Best Scientists Citing C. David Levermore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles