| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 60 | 559 | 288 | 210 | 12269 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Charles R. Doering between 1959 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles R. Doering published across 64 years, from 1959 to 2022, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1995. 5 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.
255 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1959 | 1 |
| 1960 | 0 |
| 1961 | 0 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 0 |
| 1964 | 0 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0 |
| 1983 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 7 |
| 1988 | 5 |
| 1989 | 9 |
| 1990 | 5 |
| 1991 | 5 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 6 |
| 1994 | 3 |
| 1995 | 17 |
| 1996 | 6 |
| 1997 | 5 |
| 1998 | 3 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 10 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 13 |
| 2006 | 9 |
| 2007 | 8 |
| 2008 | 6 |
| 2009 | 6 |
| 2010 | 12 |
| 2011 | 10 |
| 2012 | 7 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 7 |
| 2015 | 11 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2018 | 13 |
| 2019 | 7 |
| 2020 | 13 |
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 1 |
| Total | 255 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Doering sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 210 publications — 66th percentile
66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 42–46 | 3 | |
| 47–51 | 5 | |
| 52–56 | 7 | |
| 57–61 | 20 | |
| 62–66 | 14 | |
| 67–71 | 25 | |
| 72–76 | 19 | |
| 77–81 | 35 | |
| 82–86 | 50 | |
| 87–91 | 60 | |
| 92–96 | 86 | |
| 97–101 | 84 | |
| 102–106 | 83 | |
| 107–111 | 90 | |
| 112–116 | 99 | |
| 117–121 | 90 | |
| 122–126 | 91 | |
| 127–131 | 109 | |
| 132–136 | 110 | |
| 137–141 | 98 | |
| 142–146 | 112 | |
| 147–151 | 102 | |
| 152–156 | 88 | |
| 157–161 | 106 | |
| 162–166 | 83 | |
| 167–171 | 102 | |
| 172–176 | 77 | |
| 177–181 | 81 | |
| 182–186 | 78 | |
| 187–191 | 71 | |
| 192–196 | 92 | |
| 197–201 | 64 | |
| 202–206 | 69 | |
| 207–211 | 64 | 210 |
| 212–216 | 62 | |
| 217–221 | 58 | |
| 222–226 | 53 | |
| 227–231 | 50 | |
| 232–236 | 46 | |
| 237–241 | 46 | |
| 242–246 | 46 | |
| 247–251 | 43 | |
| 252–256 | 29 | |
| 257–261 | 45 | |
| 262–266 | 30 | |
| 267–271 | 33 | |
| 272–276 | 34 | |
| 277–281 | 30 | |
| 282–286 | 31 | |
| 287–291 | 21 | |
| 292–296 | 34 | |
| 297–301 | 26 | |
| 302–306 | 10 | |
| 307–311 | 17 | |
| 312–316 | 23 | |
| 317–321 | 13 | |
| 322–326 | 16 | |
| 327–331 | 26 | |
| 332–336 | 13 | |
| 337–341 | 13 | |
| 342–346 | 16 | |
| 347–351 | 17 | |
| 352–356 | 12 | |
| 357–361 | 18 | |
| 362–366 | 18 | |
| 367–371 | 9 | |
| 372–376 | 11 | |
| 377–381 | 8 | |
| 382–386 | 8 | |
| 387–391 | 9 | |
| 392–396 | 9 | |
| 397–401 | 8 | |
| 402–406 | 11 | |
| 407–411 | 6 | |
| 412–416 | 6 | |
| 417–421 | 9 | |
| 422–426 | 8 | |
| 427–431 | 5 | |
| 432–436 | 8 | |
| 437–441 | 8 | |
| 442–446 | 4 | |
| 447–451 | 4 | |
| 452–456 | 4 | |
| 457–461 | 2 | |
| 462–466 | 2 | |
| 467–471 | 4 | |
| 472–476 | 3 | |
| 477–481 | 3 | |
| 482–486 | 6 | |
| 487–491 | 3 | |
| 492–496 | 5 | |
| 497–501 | 5 | |
| 502–506 | 1 | |
| 507–511 | 6 | |
| 512–516 | 4 | |
| 517–521 | 1 | |
| 522–526 | 3 | |
| 527–531 | 1 | |
| 532–536 | 4 | |
| 537+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Doering sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 60 D-Index — 85th percentile
85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 174 | |
| 31 | 151 | |
| 32 | 174 | |
| 33 | 117 | |
| 34 | 136 | |
| 35 | 127 | |
| 36 | 145 | |
| 37 | 153 | |
| 38 | 150 | |
| 39 | 150 | |
| 40 | 138 | |
| 41 | 136 | |
| 42 | 93 | |
| 43 | 108 | |
| 44 | 115 | |
| 45 | 112 | |
| 46 | 103 | |
| 47 | 75 | |
| 48 | 59 | |
| 49 | 67 | |
| 50 | 60 | |
| 51 | 57 | |
| 52 | 59 | |
| 53 | 62 | |
| 54 | 60 | |
| 55 | 50 | |
| 56 | 42 | |
| 57 | 54 | |
| 58 | 50 | |
| 59 | 42 | |
| 60 | 41 | 60 |
| 61 | 35 | |
| 62 | 40 | |
| 63 | 21 | |
| 64 | 31 | |
| 65 | 27 | |
| 66 | 29 | |
| 67 | 19 | |
| 68 | 25 | |
| 69 | 17 | |
| 70 | 18 | |
| 71 | 12 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 13 | |
| 74 | 18 | |
| 75 | 9 | |
| 76 | 11 | |
| 77 | 10 | |
| 78 | 9 | |
| 79 | 16 | |
| 80 | 12 | |
| 81 | 10 | |
| 82 | 5 | |
| 83 | 5 | |
| 84 | 13 | |
| 85 | 6 | |
| 86+ | 99 |
Charles R. Doering was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research work was situated primarily within the fields of Engineering and Physics and Astronomy. The subfields they contributed to included Computational Mechanics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Global and Planetary Change, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Atmospheric Science.
The main topics addressed in their research spanned Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design, Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Model Reduction and Neural Networks, and Fractional Differential Equations Solutions.
Among their recent papers were the following:
Frequent coauthors included:
They published regularly in the following venues:
Charles R. Doering was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2016. Earlier, in 2011, they were named a SIAM Fellow for contributions to the understanding of phenomena in nonlinear and stochastic dynamical systems, turbulent transport, and mixing.
Charles R. Doering;J. D. Gibbon
Charles R. Doering;Charles R. Doering;Werner Horsthemke;Werner Horsthemke;Jason Riordan;Jason Riordan
Charles R. Doering;Jonathan C. Gadoua
C R Doering;J D Gibbon;D D Holm;B Nicolaenko
Charles R. Doering;Peter Constantin
Charles R. Doering;Peter Constantin
Daniel ben-Avraham;Daniel ben-Avraham;Martin A. Burschka;Martin A. Burschka;Charles R. Doering
Charles R. Doering;Khachik V. Sargsyan;Leonard M. Sander
Charles R. Doering;Daniel ben-Avraham
Charles R. Doering;John D. Gibbon;C. David Levermore
Charles R. Doering;Peter Constantin
M. Bartuccelli;P. Constantin;C. R. Doering;J. D. Gibbon
Adi R. Bulsara;Timothy C Elston;Charles R. Doering;Steve B. Lowen
Peter Constantin;Charles R. Doering
Charles R. Doering;Ciprian Foias
Zhi Lin;Jean Luc Thiffeault;Charles R. Doering
Hans Johnston;Charles R. Doering
Charles R. Doering
Charles R. Doering;Carl Mueller;Peter Smereka
U. Zürcher;C. R. Doering
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many professionals enhance their skill set with business-focused programs, such as 12 month mba programs, which provide accelerated paths to leadership roles without sacrificing professional commitments.
Additionally, flexible options like online mba with transfer credits accepted offer a great way to continue education with credit from previous coursework. This flexibility is especially beneficial for math graduates looking to transition into managerial or analytical roles.
Mathematics graduates often have a natural affinity for data-driven careers, making a strong case for pursuing analytics masters programs. These degrees develop critical skills in data interpretation and decision-making that are in high demand across industries.
For those seeking easier entry points into graduate education, options like the easiest mba program to get into can be a strategic consideration, providing accessible yet reputable credentials to complement a mathematics background.