World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David G. Tarr

David G. Tarr

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
38
Citations
6671
World Ranking
2541
National Ranking
1426

David G. Tarr publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Tarr sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 222 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

David G. Tarr D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Tarr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

David G. Tarr is affiliated with the World Bank in the United States. Their research primarily explores topics related to global trade, economics, fiscal policy, climate change policy, and environmental sustainability.

Their scholarly work encompasses various main fields of study, including:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Within these broader fields, their subfields of study are identified as:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Strategy and Management
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Engineering

Key topics covered by their research include:

  • Global trade and economics
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Merger and Competition Analysis

David G. Tarr's recent publications demonstrate a focus on international trade and environmental economics. Selected papers include:

  • "Why carbon border adjustment mechanisms will not save the planet but a climate club and subsidies for transformative green technologies may," 2023, Energy Economics

Their other works, authored by frequent coauthor Edward J. Balistreri, concentrate on welfare gains and mathematical modeling in international trade frameworks, published between 2020 and 2022:

  • "Welfare gains in the Armington, Krugman and Melitz models: Comparisons grounded on gravity," 2022, Economic Inquiry
  • "Mathematics of Generalized Versions of the Melitz, Krugman and Armington Models with Detailed Derivations," 2022, Journal of Global Economic Analysis
  • "Mathematics of the Armington, Krugman and Melitz Models with Multiple Sectors and Heterogeneous Regions, With Detailed Derivations," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal

Their publication history also reflects contributions to other journals such as the Review of World Economics. Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Edward J. Balistreri
  • Дмитрий Кузнецов
  • Indra Øverland
  • Roman Vakulchuk
  • Вероніка Мовчан

David G. Tarr has published most frequently in the SSRN Electronic Journal, with additional works appearing in Energy Economics, Economic Inquiry, the Journal of Global Economic Analysis, and the Review of World Economics.

Best Publications

  • Quantifying the Uruguay Round

    Glenn W. Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • A general equilibrium analysis of US foreign trade policy

    Cillian Ryan;Jamie De Melo;David Tarr

  • Economic implications for Turkey of a Customs Union with the European Union

    Glenn W. Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Adjusting to trade policy reform

    Steven J. Matusz;David Tarr

  • The Impact of Liberalizing Barriers to Foreign Direct Investment in Services: The Case of Russian Accession to the World Trade Organization

    Jesper Jensen;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Poverty Effects of Russia’s WTO Accession: Modeling “Real” Households and Endogenous Productivity Effects

    Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Trade and direct investment in producer services and the domestic market for expertise

    James Markusen;Thomas F. Rutherford;David Tarr

  • Trade liberalization, product variety and growth in a small open economy: a quantitative assessment

    Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Increased Competition and Completion of the Market in the European Union: Static and Steady State Effects

    Glenn Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David Tarr

  • Increased Competition and Completion of the Market in the European Union: Static and Steady State Effects

    Glenn W. Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Trade liberalization, poverty and efficient equity

    Glenn Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David Tarr

  • Trade liberalization, poverty and efficient equity

    Glenn W. Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • International Knowledge Flows and Economic Performance: A Review of the Evidence

    Giorgio Barba Navaretti;David Tarr

  • International Knowledge Flows and Economic Performance: A Review of the Evidence

    Giorgio Barba Navaretti;David G. Tarr

  • Adjusting to Trade Policy Reform

    Unknown

  • Trade Reform in the Partially Liberalized Economy of Turkey

    Glenn Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David Tarr

  • Trade Reform in the Partially Liberalized Economy of Turkey

    Glenn W. Harrison;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • The merits of dual pricing of Russian natural gas

    David G. Tarr;Peter D. Thomson

  • Modeling services liberalization : the case of Kenya

    Edward J. Balistreri;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Modeling Services Liberalization: The Case of Kenya

    Edward J. Balistreri;Thomas F. Rutherford;David G. Tarr

  • Poverty effects of Russia's WTO accession: Modeling “real” households with endogenous productivity effects

    Unknown

  • The Eurasian Economic Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and the Kyrgyz Republic: Can It Succeed Where Its Predecessor Failed?

    David G. Tarr

  • Estimates of ad valorem equivalents of barriers against foreign suppliers of services in eleven services sectors and 103 countries

    Yaghoob Jafari;David G. Tarr

  • Trade, Exchange Rate, and Energy Pricing Reform in Iran: Potentially Large Efficiency Effects and Gains to the Poor

    Jesper Jensen;David Tarr

  • A General Equilibrium Analysis of U.S. Foreign Trade Policy

    William Diebold;Jaime de Melo;David Tarr

  • Foreign direct investment in services and the domestic market for expertise

    James R Markusen;James R Markusen;James R Markusen;Thomas F Rutherford;David Tarr

  • Welfare Costs of US Quotas in Textiles, Steel and Autos

    David G. Tarr;Jaime De Melo

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Rutherford
Thomas F. Rutherford University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jesper Jensen
Jesper Jensen Aalborg University
Glenn W. Harrison
Glenn W. Harrison Georgia State University
James R. Markusen
James R. Markusen University of Colorado Boulder
Bernard Hoekman
Bernard Hoekman European University Institute
E. Elisabet Rutström
E. Elisabet Rutström Georgia State University
Christoph Böhringer
Christoph Böhringer Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Jaime de Melo
Jaime de Melo University of Geneva
François Bourguignon
François Bourguignon Paris School of Economics
Keith E. Maskus
Keith E. Maskus University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Economics and Finance opens doors to a wide range of dynamic online graduate programs and career opportunities. For those interested in human resources, pursuing the best masters degree for hr professionals can equip you with the skills needed to lead talent management and organizational development.

Data-driven decision making is becoming essential across business sectors. Earning an ms in data analytics online empowers you to interpret and leverage complex data sets, which is highly valued in both economic analysis and corporate strategy roles.

Enhancing your leadership capabilities is also a sought-after pathway. Consider a masters in organizational development online to build expertise in guiding teams and managing change within companies and institutions.

If your interests align with turning data into actionable business insights, an online business intelligence degree can help you master analytics platforms and drive growth within organizations.

Each pathway complements an Economics and Finance education, expanding your career options and enhancing your real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Tarr

Trending Scientists