World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
5842
World Ranking
7795
National Ranking
492

Mark Wenig publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wenig sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark Wenig D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wenig sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Wenig is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research predominantly focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a notable emphasis on Atmospheric Science and related subfields.

Their scholarly work covers various key topics including:

  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Calibration and Measurement Techniques

Wenig has contributed research articles to multiple publication venues, with a primary concentration in Atmospheric measurement techniques. Other venues include Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Earth system science data, Particle and Fibre Toxicology, and Atmósfera.

Recent publications include:

  • Intercomparison of NO 2, O 4, O 3 and HCHO slant column measurements by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV-visible spectrometers during CINDI-2 (2020), Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric NO 2 and HCHO in Munich and the comparison to OMI and TROPOMI satellite observations (2020), Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign (2021), Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • An improved TROPOMI tropospheric NO 2 research product over Europe (2021), Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Spatial and temporal representativeness of point measurements for nitrogen dioxide pollution levels in cities (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wenig include:

  • Ka Lok Chan
  • Thomas Wagner
  • Michel Van Roozendaël
  • François Hendrick
  • Andreas Richter

Best Publications

  • Weekly cycle of NO 2 by GOME measurements: a signature of anthropogenic sources

    S. Beirle;U. Platt;M. Wenig;T. Wagner

  • Quantitative analysis of NO x emissions from Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment satellite image sequences

    C. Leue;M. Wenig;T. Wagner;Oliver Klimm

  • Algorithm for NO/sub 2/ vertical column retrieval from the ozone monitoring instrument

    E.J. Bucsela;E.A. Celarier;M.O. Wenig;J.F. Gleason

  • Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

    E.A. Celarier;E.J. Brinksma;J.F. Gleason;J.P. Veefkind

  • The version 3 OMI NO 2 standard product

    Nickolay A. Krotkov;Lok N. Lamsal;Lok N. Lamsal;Edward A. Celarier;Edward A. Celarier;William H. Swartz;William H. Swartz

  • Estimate of nitrogen oxide emissions from shipping by satellite remote sensing

    S. Beirle;U. Platt;R. von Glasow;M. Wenig

  • Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 observations during INTEX-B and application to constrain NOx emissions over the eastern United States and Mexico

    K.F. Boersma;Daniel J. Jacob;E.J. Bucsela;A.E. Perring

  • Spatial and temporal distribution of enhanced boundary layer BrO concentrations measured by the GOME instrument aboard ERS‐2

    T. Wagner;C. Leue;M. Wenig;K. Pfeilsticker

  • Global tropospheric NO2 column distributions: Comparing three‐dimensional model calculations with GOME measurements

    Guus J. M. Velders;Claire Granier;Robert W. Portmann;Klaus Pfeilsticker

  • Intercontinental transport of nitrogen oxide pollution plumes

    M. Wenig;M. Wenig;N. Spichtinger;A. Stohl;G. Held

  • Satellite detection of a continental-scale plume of nitrogen oxides from boreal forest fires.

    N. Spichtinger;M. Wenig;P. James;T. Wagner

  • Comparison of tropospheric NO2 from in situ aircraft measurements with near-real-time and standard product data from OMI

    E. J. Bucsela;E. J. Bucsela;E. J. Bucsela;A. E. Perring;R. C. Cohen;K. F. Boersma

  • Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column densities using direct‐Sun mode Brewer measurements at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

    Mark O. Wenig;Mark O. Wenig;A. M. Cede;E. J. Bucsela;E. A. Celarier

  • Space-based constraints on spatial and temporal patterns of NO(x) emissions in California, 2005-2008.

    Ashley R Russell;Lukas C Valin;Eric J Bucsela;Mark O Wenig

  • Intercomparison of NO2, O4, O3 and HCHO slant column measurements by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV-visible spectrometers during CINDI-2

    Karin Kreher;Michel Van Roozendael;Francois Hendrick;Arnoud Apituley

  • Quantitative analysis of NOx emissions from GOME-satellite image sequences

    C. Leue;M. Wenig;T. Wagner;Oliver Klimm

  • NOx production by lightning estimated with GOME

    S Beirle;U Platt;M Wenig;T Wagner

  • Transport of dusts from East Asian and non-East Asian sources to Hong Kong during dust storm related events 1996-2007

    Y.C. Lee;Xun Yang;Mark Wenig

  • UV‐visible observations of atmospheric O4 absorptions using direct moonlight and zenith‐scattered sunlight for clear‐sky and cloudy sky conditions

    T. Wagner;C. von Friedeburg;M. Wenig;C. Otten

  • MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric NO 2 and HCHO in Munich and the comparison to OMI and TROPOMI satellite observations

    Ka Lok Chan;Matthias Wiegner;Jos van Geffen;Isabelle De Smedt

  • MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric NO 2 and HCHO in Nanjing and a comparison to ozone monitoring instrument observations

    Ka Lok Chan;Zhuoru Wang;Aijun Ding;Klaus-Peter Heue

  • Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign

    Jan-Lukas Tirpitz;Udo Frieß;François Hendrick;Carlos Alberti;Carlos Alberti

  • Global tropospheric NO2 column distributions' Comparing three-dimensional model calculations with GOME

    Guus J. M. Velders;Claire Granier;Robert W. Portmann;Klaus Pfeilsticker

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wagner
Thomas Wagner Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Ulrich Platt
Ulrich Platt Heidelberg University
Steffen Beirle
Steffen Beirle Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Kalok Chan
Kalok Chan City University of Hong Kong
Andreas Richter
Andreas Richter University of Bremen
James F. Gleason
James F. Gleason Goddard Space Flight Center
Bernd Jähne
Bernd Jähne Heidelberg University
John P. Burrows
John P. Burrows University of Bremen
Folkard Wittrock
Folkard Wittrock University of Bremen
Timothy H. Bertram
Timothy H. Bertram University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens the door to various related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. For those looking for a simpler academic path, exploring the easiest bachelor's degree options might be helpful in balancing workload while gaining relevant knowledge.

Specialized fields like geology are closely related to environmental studies. If you’re interested in Earth sciences, consider pursuing geology degrees online. These programs provide comprehensive insights into the physical composition of the Earth, vital for understanding environmental processes and challenges.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable in environmental careers. Learning spatial data analysis can give you a competitive advantage. Several institutions offer top-ranked programs, so researching the best GIS schools online is a strategic move for skill development.

For those interested in leadership and policy, combining environmental knowledge with public administration is a smart choice. Consider pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration to prepare for roles that influence environmental regulations and community impact.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wenig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles