World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
14417
World Ranking
5573
National Ranking
261

Markus Bühner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Bühner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Markus Bühner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Bühner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Bühner is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their primary field of research is psychology, with a focus spanning several subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and education.

Their research covers a range of mental health and personality-related topics. These include mental health research topics, mental health treatment and access, schizophrenia research and treatment, COVID-19 and mental health, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, psychiatric care and mental health services, and personality traits and psychology.

Markus Bühner has contributed to various academic venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Psychologische Rundschau
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
  • European Journal of Personality
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Research Square

Notable recent papers co-authored include:

  • "Predicting personality from patterns of behavior collected with smartphones," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Personality Research and Assessment in the Era of Machine Learning," 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • "One model to rule them all? Using machine learning algorithms to determine the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis," 2020, Psychological Methods
  • "Personality Sensing for Theory Development and Assessment in the Digital Age," 2020, European Journal of Personality
  • "To Challenge the Morning Lark and the Night Owl: Using Smartphone Sensing Data to Investigate Day-Night Behaviour Patterns," 2020, European Journal of Personality

Frequent collaborators of Bühner include:

  • Peter Falkai
  • Frank Padberg
  • Jochen Gensichen
  • Antonius Schneider
  • Ramona Schoedel

In addition to journal articles, Bühner has published books with Springer Nature, including a work titled Statistik released in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion

    Markus Bühner

  • Is It Really Robust

    Emanuel Schmider;Matthias Ziegler;Erik Danay;Luzi Beyer

  • Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler

    Markus Bühner;Matthias Ziegler

  • Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice

    David Goretzko;Trang Thien Huong Pham;Markus Bühner

  • Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.

    Moritz Heene;Sven Hilbert;Clemens Draxler;Matthias Ziegler

  • Does Working Memory Training Transfer? A Meta-Analysis Including Training Conditions as Moderators

    Matthias Schwaighofer;Frank Fischer;Markus Bühner

  • Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not

    Cornelius J. Konig;Markus Buhner;Gesine Murling

  • Predicting personality from patterns of behavior collected with smartphones.

    Clemens Stachl;Quay Au;Ramona Schoedel;Samuel D Gosling;Samuel D Gosling

  • Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model

    Matthias Ziegler;Erik Danay;Moritz Heene;Jens Asendorpf

  • Neural efficiency as a function of task demands.

    Beate Dunst;Mathias Benedek;Emanuel Jauk;Sabine Bergner

  • Working Memory Dimensions as Differential Predictors of the Speed and Error Aspect of Multitasking Performance

    Markus Bühner;Cornelius J. König;Marion Pick;Stefan Krumm

  • Two different sides of 'chemobrain': determinants and nondeterminants of self-perceived cognitive dysfunction in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

    Kerstin Hermelink;Helmut Küchenhoff;Michael Untch;Ingo Bauerfeind

  • Psychiatrists' use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics.

    Johannes Hamann;Rosmarie Mendel;Rudolf Cohen;Stephan Heres

  • Sensing Sociability: Individual Differences in Young Adults' Conversation, Calling, Texting, and App Use Behaviors in Daily Life

    Gabriella M Harari;Sandrine Ruth Müller;Clemens Stachl;Rui Wang

  • Is there a reliable factorial structure in the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale? A comparison of factor models in clinical and normal adult samples.

    Jochen Müller;Markus Bühner;Heiner Ellgring

  • Personality traits predict smartphone usage.

    Clemens Stachl;Sven Hilbert;Sven Hilbert;Jiew–Quay Au;Daniel Buschek

  • The Digit Span Backwards Task

    Sven Hilbert;Tristan T. Nakagawa;Patricia Puci;Alexandra Zech

  • Chemotherapy and Post-traumatic Stress in the Causation of Cognitive Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Patients.

    Kerstin Hermelink;Markus Bühner;Philipp Sckopke;Franziska Neufeld

  • Working memory, visual–spatial-intelligence and their relationship to problem-solving

    Markus Bühner;Stephan Kröner;Matthias Ziegler

  • Self-Report Measures of Academic Emotions

    Reinhard Pekrun;Markus Bühner

  • The assessment of alexithymia: psychometric properties and validity of the Bermond–Vorst alexithymia questionnaire

    Jochen Müller;Markus Bühner;Heiner Ellgring

  • Personality Research and Assessment in the Era of Machine Learning

    Clemens Stachl;Clemens Stachl;Florian Pargent;Sven Hilbert;Gabriella M. Harari

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Ziegler
Matthias Ziegler Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Birgit Spinath
Birgit Spinath Heidelberg University
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Samuel D. Gosling
Samuel D. Gosling The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas Fydrich
Thomas Fydrich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Edgar Erdfelder
Edgar Erdfelder University of Mannheim
Mario Gollwitzer
Mario Gollwitzer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Daniel Freeman
Daniel Freeman University of Oxford
Nadia Harbeck
Nadia Harbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can lead to a range of fulfilling career opportunities, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. This pathway is increasingly in demand as communities nationwide prioritize mental health and addiction services. Earning an online psychology degree can be a flexible, accessible way to begin or advance your career in this sector.

Each state has specific qualifications for substance abuse counselors. Those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Raleigh must follow North Carolina’s unique licensing and education requirements. For those exploring substance abuse counselor requirements in Reno, Nevada emphasizes supervision hours and practical training.

If you aim to learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Richmond, Virginia’s pathway involves specific coursework and certification exams. On the West Coast, substance abuse counselor requirements in Riverside reflect California’s standards for training and state licensure.

Choosing an accredited online psychology program can smoothly align with these varied state requirements and open doors to meaningful careers helping individuals overcome addiction.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Bühner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles