World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrizia Trifilò

Patrizia Trifilò

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
30
Citations
3211
World Ranking
6443
National Ranking
264

Patrizia Trifilò publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrizia Trifilò sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Patrizia Trifilò D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrizia Trifilò sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • New evidence for a role of vessel‐associated cells and phloem in the rapid xylem refilling of cavitated stems of Laurus nobilis L.

    S. Salleo;M. A. Lo Gullo;P. Trifilò;A. Nardini

  • Starch-to-sugar conversion in wood parenchyma of field-growing Laurus nobilis plants: a component of the signal pathway for embolism repair?

    Sebastiano Salleo;Patrizia Trifilò;Sara Esposito;Andrea Nardini

  • The challenge of the Mediterranean climate to plant hydraulics: Responses and adaptations

    Andrea Nardini;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Patrizia Trifilò;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Relax and refill: xylem rehydration prior to hydraulic measurements favours embolism repair in stems and generates artificially low PLC values.

    Patrizia Trifilò;Fabio Raimondo;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Piera M. Barbera

  • Phloem as a possible major determinant of rapid cavitation reversal in stems of Laurus nobilis (laurel).

    Sebastiano Salleo;Patrizia Trifilò;Maria A Lo Gullo

  • Drought resistance of Ailanthus altissima: root hydraulics and water relations.

    P Trifilò;F Raimondo;A Nardini;M A Lo Gullo

  • Diurnal and seasonal variations in leaf hydraulic conductance in evergreen and deciduous trees.

    Maria A. Lo Gullo;Andrea Nardini;Patrizia Trifilò;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Changes in leaf hydraulics and stomatal conductance following drought stress and irrigation in Ceratonia siliqua (Carob tree)

    Maria A. Lo Gullo;Andrea Nardini;Patrizia Trifilò;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Coping with drought-induced xylem cavitation: coordination of embolism repair and ionic effects in three Mediterranean evergreens

    Patrizia Trifilò;Piera M Barbera;Fabio Raimondo;Andrea Nardini

  • Do quantitative vessel and pit characters account for ion-mediated changes in the hydraulic conductance of angiosperm xylem

    Steven Jansen;Steven Jansen;Emmanuelle Gortan;Frederic Lens;Maria Assunta Lo Gullo

  • The contribution of vascular and extra-vascular water pathways to drought-induced decline of leaf hydraulic conductance.

    Patrizia Trifiló;Fabio Raimondo;Tadeja Savi;Maria A. Lo Gullo

  • Diurnal changes in embolism rate in nine dry forest trees: relationships with species-specific xylem vulnerability, hydraulic strategy and wood traits.

    Patrizia Trifilò;Andrea Nardini;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Piera M. Barbera

  • Changes of xylem sap ionic content and stem hydraulics in response to irradiance in Laurus nobilis.

    Andrea Nardini;Fulvio Grego;Patrizia Trifilò;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Ion-mediated enhancement of xylem hydraulic conductivity is not always suppressed by the presence of Ca2+ in the sap

    Andrea Nardini;Antonio Gascò;Patrizia Trifilò;Maria A. Lo Gullo

  • Species-specific reversal of stem xylem embolism after a prolonged drought correlates to endpoint concentration of soluble sugars

    Tadeja Savi;Valentino Casolo;Jessica Luglio;Stefano Bertuzzi

  • Vein cavitation and stomatal behaviour of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) leaves under water limitation

    Patrizia Trifilò;Andrea Nardini;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Sebastiano Salleo

  • Axial‐to‐radial water permeability of leaf major veins: a possible determinant of the impact of vein embolism on leaf hydraulics?

    Sebastiano Salleo;F Raimondo;P Trifilò;Andrea Nardini

  • Hydraulic recovery from xylem embolism in excised branches of twelve woody species: Relationships with parenchyma cells and non-structural carbohydrates.

    Patrizia Trifilò;Natasa Kiorapostolou;Francesco Petruzzellis;Stefano Vitti

  • Water relations and hydraulic characteristics of three woody species co-occurring in the same habitat

    Andrea Nardini;Sebastiano Salleo;Patrizia Trifilò;Maria Assunta Lo Gullo

  • X-ray microtomography observations of xylem embolism in stems of Laurus nobilis are consistent with hydraulic measurements of percentage loss of conductance

    Andrea Nardini;Tadeja Savi;Adriano Losso;Giai Petit

  • Kinetics of recovery of leaf hydraulic conductance and vein functionality from cavitation‐induced embolism in sunflower

    Patrizia Trifilò;Antonio Gascó;Fabio Raimondo;Andrea Nardini

  • Rootstock effects on xylem conduit dimensions and vulnerability to cavitation of Olea europaea L

    Patrizia Trifilò;Maria A. Lo Gullo;Andrea Nardini;Fulvio Pernice

  • Do quantitative vessel and pit characters account for ion-mediated changes in the hydraulic conductance of angiosperm xylem?

    S. Jansen;E. Gortan;F. Lens;M. Assunta Lo Gullo

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Nardini
Andrea Nardini University of Trieste
Sebastiano Salleo
Sebastiano Salleo University of Trieste
M. A. Lo Gullo
M. A. Lo Gullo University of Messina
Steven Jansen
Steven Jansen University of Ulm
Stefan Mayr
Stefan Mayr University of Innsbruck
Frederic Lens
Frederic Lens Naturalis Biodiversity Center
Donald R. Young
Donald R. Young Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Patrizia Trifilò

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles