World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2485 2273 271 255 227 16670

Dylan Marc Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dylan Marc Jones between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dylan Marc Jones published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1999. 6 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1999. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications
1974 2024

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dylan Marc Jones: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 3
1979 3
1980 2
1981 3
1982 2
1983 4
1984 3
1985 0
1986 6
1987 7
1988 5
1989 7
1990 5
1991 6
1992 13
1993 9
1994 1
1995 9
1996 5
1997 6
1998 7
1999 15
2000 9
2001 10
2002 8
2003 8
2004 8
2005 7
2006 6
2007 8
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 3
2012 8
2013 9
2014 7
2015 6
2016 5
2017 3
2018 2
2019 2
2020 3
2021 2
2022 7
2023 3
2024 3
Total 266
Download as CSV

Dylan Marc Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dylan Marc Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 227
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dylan Marc Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dylan Marc Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dylan Marc Jones is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Psychology and Neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience as key subfields. The scientist's work also intersects with Sociology and Political Science, as well as Information Systems and Management and issues related to Safety, Risk, Reliability, and Quality.

Their research topics are diverse, covering areas such as Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Memory Processes and Influences, Personal Information Management and User Behavior, Traffic and Road Safety, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Dylan Marc Jones include:

  • Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents, 2023, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • Reducing risk to security and privacy in the selection of trigger-action rules: Implicit vs. explicit priming for domestic smart devices, 2022, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • The dissociations of confidence from accuracy in forced-choice recognition judgments, 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Forgetting during interruptions: the role of goal similarity, 2024, Journal of Cognitive Psychology
  • The company a word keeps: The role of neighbourhood density in verbal short-term memory, 2022, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dylan Marc Jones include Phillip L. Morgan, Qiyuan Zhang, Christopher D. Wallbridge, Maciej Hanczakowski, and C. Philip Beaman.

The scientist regularly publishes in several venues, notably the Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Procedia Computer Science, SSRN Electronic Journal, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, and the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. They have contributed multiple articles to these journals, with particular representation in the Journal of Cognitive Psychology and Procedia Computer Science.

Best Publications

  • Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist

    Gerald Matthews;Dylan M. Jones;A. Graham Chamberlain

  • Memory updating in working memory : the role of the central executive

    Neil Morris;Dylan M. Jones

  • Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory

    Dylan Marc Jones;William MacKen

  • Navigating buildings in "desk-top" virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience.

    Roy A. Ruddle;Stephen J. Payne;Dylan Marc Jones

  • Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State

    Dylan M. Jones;Clare Madden;Chris Miles

  • Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications

    Simon P. Banbury;William John Macken;Sebastien Tremblay;Dylan Marc Jones

  • Functional equivalence of verbal and spatial information in serial short-term memory.

    Dylan Marc Jones;Paul Farrand;George Stuart;Neil Morris

  • Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory?

    Dylan Marc Jones;Christopher Miles;Jean Page

  • Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.

    Robert Wyn Hughes;Francois Vachon;Dylan Marc Jones

  • The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological, and is it a store?

    Dylan Marc Jones;William John Macken;Alastair P. Nicholls

  • Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention.

    Dylan Jones

  • Navigating Large-Scale Virtual Environments: What Differences Occur Between Helmet-Mounted and Desk-Top Displays?

    Roy A. Ruddle;Stephen J. Payne;Dylan M. Jones

  • Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis

    C. Philip Beaman;Dylan M. Jones

  • Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty foreknowledge and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account

    Robert Wyn Hughes;Mark J. Hurlstone;John Everett Marsh;Francois Vachon

  • Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction

    John Everett Marsh;Robert Wyn Hughes;Dylan Marc Jones

  • Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach.

    Helen Mary Hodgetts;Dylan Marc Jones

  • Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity?

    Dylan Marc Jones;William John Macken

  • Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

    Dylan Marc Jones;Sebastien Tremblay

  • Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?

    Robert Wyn Hughes;Francois Vachon;Dylan Marc Jones

  • Intra- and inter-modal repetition priming of familiar faces and voices

    Hadyn Douglas Ellis;Dylan Marc Jones;Nicholas Alexander Mosdell

  • Hours of work: Temporal factors in work-scheduling

    Dylan Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Sébastien Tremblay
Sébastien Tremblay Université Laval
Fabrice B. R. Parmentier
Fabrice B. R. Parmentier University of Western Australia
Stephen J. Payne
Stephen J. Payne University of Bath
adrian l harris
adrian l harris University of Oxford
Patrik Sörqvist
Patrik Sörqvist University of Gaevle
Murray T. Maybery
Murray T. Maybery University of Western Australia
Andrew Paul Smith
Andrew Paul Smith Cardiff University
Gerald Matthews
Gerald Matthews George Mason University
Donald E. Broadbent
Donald E. Broadbent University of Oxford
Allen J. Bailey
Allen J. Bailey University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of fulfilling careers. One increasingly popular pathway is in speech-language pathology, a field that blends psychology with healthcare. To become a speech-language pathologist, students often begin with a psychology-related undergraduate degree before earning a specialized master’s and passing state-specific exams.

Certification requirements vary by state, so it's essential to understand local regulations. For example, those interested in practicing in Nevada should review the Nevada slp certification requirements. If you are considering working in New Hampshire, be sure to check the New Hampshire speech pathologist certification requirements as well.

Exploring other states, you might want to learn about the New Jersey slp certification requirements or research how to become a speech language pathologist in New Mexico. Understanding the certification process for your desired state is crucial for planning your educational journey and career success.

Best Scientists Citing Dylan Marc Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles