World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
6903
World Ranking
6328
National Ranking
2148

Marcos Longo publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Longo sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 130 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Marcos Longo D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcos Longo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcos Longo is affiliated with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in the United States. Their primary research area is environmental science, with a particular focus on global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, environmental engineering, ecology, and atmospheric science.

Longo's research topics encompass plant water relations and carbon dynamics, remote sensing and LiDAR applications, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, remote sensing in agriculture, forest ecology and management, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and climate variability and models.

Frequent coauthors include Michael Keller, Jean Pierre Ometto, Eric Bastos Görgens, Luciane Sato, and Mauro Assis. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse body of work published in several scientific venues.

Key publication venues for Longo's work are Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Global Change Biology, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Remote Sensing of Environment, and New Phytologist.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Detecting forest response to droughts with global observations of vegetation water content, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Persistent collapse of biomass in Amazonian forest edges following deforestation leads to unaccounted carbon losses, 2020, Science Advances
  • Impacts of Degradation on Water, Energy, and Carbon Cycling of the Amazon Tropical Forests, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Detecting vulnerability of humid tropical forests to multiple stressors, 2021, One Earth

The research by Longo covers a wide range of environmental issues, with significant attention to forest ecosystems, carbon cycling, and the application of remote sensing technologies. This body of work contributes to understanding ecosystem responses to environmental stressors such as drought and deforestation.

Best Publications

  • The Amazon basin in transition

    Eric A. Davidson;Alessandro C. de Araújo;Alessandro C. de Araújo;Paulo Artaxo;Jennifer K. Balch;Jennifer K. Balch

  • Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities.

    Rosie A. Fisher;Charles D. Koven;William R. L. Anderegg;Bradley O. Christoffersen

  • Ecosystem heterogeneity determines the ecological resilience of the Amazon to climate change

    Naomi M. Levine;Naomi M. Levine;Ke Zhang;Ke Zhang;Marcos Longo;Alessandro Baccini

  • Coupled weather research and forecasting-stochastic time-inverted lagrangian transport (WRF-STILT) model

    Thomas Nehrkorn;Janusz Eluszkiewicz;Steven Charles Wofsy;John C. Lin

  • Detecting forest response to droughts with global observations of vegetation water content.

    Alexandra G. Konings;Sassan S. Saatchi;Christian Frankenberg;Michael Keller;Michael Keller

  • Future deforestation in the Amazon and consequences for South American climate

    Abigail L.S. Swann;Marcos Longo;Ryan G. Knox;Eunjee Lee

  • Aboveground biomass variability across intact and degraded forests in the Brazilian Amazon

    Marcos Longo;Michael M. Keller;Michael M. Keller;Michael M. Keller;Maiza N. dos‐Santos;Veronika Leitold

  • Persistent collapse of biomass in Amazonian forest edges following deforestation leads to unaccounted carbon losses

    Celso H. L. Silva Junior;Luiz E. O. C. Aragão;Luiz E. O. C. Aragão;Liana O. Anderson;Marisa G. Fonseca

  • Combining LiDAR and hyperspectral data for aboveground biomass modeling in the Brazilian Amazon using different regression algorithms

    Catherine Torres de Almeida;Lênio Soares Galvão;Luiz Eduardo de Oliveira Cruz e Aragão;Luiz Eduardo de Oliveira Cruz e Aragão;Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud Ometto

  • The fate of Amazonian ecosystems over the coming century arising from changes in climate, atmospheric CO2, and land use.

    Ke Zhang;Ke Zhang;Ke Zhang;Andrea D. de Almeida Castanho;Andrea D. de Almeida Castanho;David R. Galbraith;Sanaz Moghim

  • Quantifying long-term changes in carbon stocks and forest structure from Amazon forest degradation

    Danielle I Rappaport;Douglas C Morton;Marcos Longo;Marcos Longo;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Michael Keller

  • Seasonal carbon dynamics and water fluxes in an Amazon rainforest

    Yeonjoo Kim;Ryan G. Knox;Marcos Longo;David Medvigy

  • River breeze circulation in eastern Amazonia: observations and modelling results

    M. A. F. Silva Dias;P. L. Silva Dias;M. Longo;D. R. Fitzjarrald

  • The biophysics, ecology, and biogeochemistry of functionally diverse, vertically and horizontally heterogeneous ecosystems: the Ecosystem Demography model, version 2.2 – Part 1: Model description

    Marcos Longo;Marcos Longo;Marcos Longo;Ryan G. Knox;Ryan G. Knox;David M. Medvigy;Naomi M. Levine

  • Sources of carbon monoxide and formaldehyde in North America determined from high-resolution atmospheric data

    Scot M. Miller;Daniel M. Matross;Arlyn E. Andrews;Dylan B. Millet

  • Linking canopy leaf area and light environments with tree size distributions to explain Amazon forest demography.

    Scott C. Stark;Scott C. Stark;Brian J. Enquist;Brian J. Enquist;Scott R. Saleska;Veronika Leitold

  • Carbon stocks in central African forests enhanced by elephant disturbance

    Fabio Berzaghi;Marcos Longo;Marcos Longo;Philippe Ciais;Stephen Blake;Stephen Blake

  • El Niño drought increased canopy turnover in Amazon forests.

    Veronika Leitold;Veronika Leitold;Douglas C. Morton;Marcos Longo;Maiza Nara dos‐Santos

  • Partitioning evapotranspiration with concurrent eddy covariance measurements in a mixed forest

    Eugénie Paul-Limoges;Sebastian Wolf;Fabian D. Schneider;Marcos Longo

  • Ecosystem heterogeneity and diversity mitigate Amazon forest resilience to frequent extreme droughts

    Marcos Longo;Marcos Longo;Ryan G Knox;Naomi M Levine;Luciana Ferreira Alves

  • Impacts of Degradation on Water, Energy, and Carbon Cycling of the Amazon Tropical Forests

    Marcos Longo;Sassan S. Saatchi;Sassan S. Saatchi;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Kevin W. Bowman

  • A case study of convective organization into precipitating lines in the Southwest Amazon during the WETAMC and TRMM‐LBA

    M. A. F. Silva Dias;W. Petersen;P. L. Silva Dias;R. Cifelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Keller
Michael Keller US Forest Service
Paul R. Moorcroft
Paul R. Moorcroft Harvard University
Douglas C. Morton
Douglas C. Morton Goddard Space Flight Center
Sassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi California Institute of Technology
Ke Zhang
Ke Zhang Hohai University
Steven C. Wofsy
Steven C. Wofsy Harvard University
Scott R. Saleska
Scott R. Saleska University of Arizona
Hans Verbeeck
Hans Verbeeck Ghent University
Michael C. Dietze
Michael C. Dietze Boston University
Stefan A. Schnitzer
Stefan A. Schnitzer Marquette University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, you might also explore related online degrees or career pathways in healthcare and communication sciences. Many students leverage flexible online programs to upskill or transition into in-demand fields.

For example, students with a biology background may consider accredited asha accredited slp programs if they wish to help people with communication disorders. Those whose undergraduate degree is not in Speech-Language Pathology can still qualify through an online speech-language pathology prerequisites program, making the shift into the field more accessible.

Additional opportunities exist for those seeking roles in healthcare. Accelerated pathways, such as accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, are designed for bachelor’s degree holders outside of nursing who want to fast-track their entry into this high-impact profession.

For future salary prospects or specialization options, explore data about unique roles such as psychiatric nurse practitioners—find out more about pmhnp salary and explore whether advanced clinical roles are a good fit for you.

Best Scientists Citing Marcos Longo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles