World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
6882
World Ranking
6796
National Ranking
535

Natalia Restrepo-Coupe publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalia Restrepo-Coupe sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 120 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Natalia Restrepo-Coupe D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalia Restrepo-Coupe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalia Restrepo-Coupe is affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with contributions spanning several interrelated subfields including global and planetary change, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, plant science, and atmospheric science.

The main topics addressed in their work feature plant water relations and carbon dynamics, climate variability and models, remote sensing in agriculture, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, forest ecology and management, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, as well as leaf properties and growth measurement.

Frequently publishing in several scientific journals, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe has contributed to Global Change Biology, Geoscientific Model Development, Nature, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Nature Plants. Their work engages multiple areas of environmental and plant science research, often linking ecosystem observations with climatic factors and remote sensing applications.

Their recent papers include:

  • Empirical evidence for resilience of tropical forest photosynthesis in a warmer world, 2020, Nature Plants
  • Bridge to the future: Important lessons from 20 years of ecosystem observations made by the OzFlux network, 2022, Global Change Biology
  • Improvement of modeling plant responses to low soil moisture in JULESvn4.9 and evaluation against flux tower measurements, 2021, Geoscientific Model Development
  • Amazon forest biogeography predicts resilience and vulnerability to drought, 2024, Nature
  • Towards a remote sensing data based evapotranspiration estimation in Northern Australia using a simple random forest approach, 2021, Journal of Arid Environments

Collaborations have played a significant role in their publication record, with frequent co-authors including S. R. Saleska, Neill Prohaska, Raimundo Cosme de Oliveira, Kleber Silva Campos, and Marielle N. Smith. These collaborations reflect ongoing engagement with researchers in similar and complementary fields, contributing to the interdisciplinary nature of their studies.

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests.

    Jin Wu;Loren P. Albert;Aline P. Lopes;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe

  • What drives the seasonality of photosynthesis across the Amazon basin? A cross-site analysis of eddy flux tower measurements from the Brasil flux network

    Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;Humberto R. da Rocha;Lucy R. Hutyra;Alessandro C. da Araujo;Alessandro C. da Araujo

  • Patterns of water and heat flux across a biome gradient from tropical forest to savanna in brazil

    Humberto R. da Rocha;Antonio O. Manzi;Osvaldo M. Cabral;Scott D. Miller

  • An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand flux tower network - OzFlux

    Jason Beringer;Lindsay B Hutley;Ian McHugh;Stefan K Arndt

  • Dry-season greening of Amazon forests.

    Scott R. Saleska;Jin Wu;Kaiyu Guan;Alessandro C. Araujo

  • Net ecosystem production in a temperate pine plantation in southeastern Canada

    M. Altaf Arain;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe

  • Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison.

    Natalia Restrepo‐Coupe;Natalia Restrepo‐Coupe;Naomi Levine;Naomi Levine;Bradley O'Donnell Christoffersen;Bradley O'Donnell Christoffersen;Loren P. Albert

  • Mechanisms of water supply and vegetation demand govern the seasonality and magnitude of evapotranspiration in Amazonia and Cerrado

    Bradley O. Christoffersen;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;M. Altaf Arain;Ian T. Baker

  • Partitioning controls on Amazon forest photosynthesis between environmental and biotic factors at hourly to interannual timescales

    Jin Wu;Kaiyu Guan;Matthew Hayek;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe

  • Land surface phenological response to decadal climate variability across Australia using satellite remote sensing

    M. Broich;M. Broich;A. Huete;M. G. Tulbure;X. Ma

  • Multiple site tower flux and remote sensing comparisons of tropical forest dynamics in Monsoon Asia

    A.R. Huete;N. Restrepo-Coupe;P. Ratana;K. Didan

  • Reviews and syntheses: Australian vegetation phenology: new insights from satellite remote sensing and digital repeat photography

    Caitlin E. Moore;Caitlin E. Moore;Tim Brown;Trevor F. Keenan;Trevor F. Keenan;Remko A. Duursma

  • Age‐dependent leaf physiology and consequences for crown‐scale carbon uptake during the dry season in an Amazon evergreen forest

    Loren P. Albert;Loren P. Albert;Jin Wu;Jin Wu;Neill Prohaska;Plinio Barbosa de Camargo

  • Biological processes dominate seasonality of remotely sensed canopy greenness in an Amazon evergreen forest

    Jin Wu;Jin Wu;Hideki Kobayashi;Scott C. Stark;Ran Meng

  • Empirical evidence for resilience of tropical forest photosynthesis in a warmer world.

    Marielle N. Smith;Marielle N. Smith;Tyeen C. Taylor;Tyeen C. Taylor;Joost van Haren;Rafael Rosolem

  • Seasonal and drought-related changes in leaf area profiles depend on height and light environment in an Amazon forest

    Marielle N. Smith;Marielle N. Smith;Scott C. Stark;Tyeen C. Taylor;Mauricio L. Ferreira

  • Variations in Amazon forest productivity correlated with foliar nutrients and modelled rates of photosynthetic carbon supply

    Lina M. Mercado;Sandra Patiño;Tomas F. Domingues;Nikolaos M. Fyllas

  • Robust dynamics of Amazon dieback to climate change with perturbed ecosystem model parameters

    Benjamin Poulter;Fred Hattermann;E. D. Hawkins;Sonke Zaehle

  • Ecosystem heterogeneity and diversity mitigate Amazon forest resilience to frequent extreme droughts

    Marcos Longo;Marcos Longo;Ryan G Knox;Naomi M Levine;Luciana Ferreira Alves

  • Hydraulic traits explain differential responses of Amazonian forests to the 2015 El Niño-induced drought

    Fernanda de V. Barros;Paulo R.L. Bittencourt;Paulo R.L. Bittencourt;Mauro Brum;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe

  • Parameterization of an ecosystem light-use-efficiency model for predicting savanna GPP using MODIS EVI

    Xuanlong Ma;Xuanlong Ma;Alfredo Huete;Qiang Yu;Natalia Restrepo-Coupe

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott R. Saleska
Scott R. Saleska University of Arizona
Alfredo Huete
Alfredo Huete University of Technology Sydney
Plínio Barbosa de Camargo
Plínio Barbosa de Camargo Universidade de São Paulo
Scott C. Stark
Scott C. Stark Michigan State University
Jason Beringer
Jason Beringer University of Western Australia
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão
Luiz E. O. C. Aragão National Institute for Space Research
Matthias Peichl
Matthias Peichl Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Kaiyu Guan
Kaiyu Guan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Valeriy Y. Ivanov
Valeriy Y. Ivanov University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Derek Eamus
Derek Eamus University of Technology Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up diverse career pathways for students interested in Ecology and Evolution. Today, related programs in mathematics, design, interdisciplinary studies, and even history provide valuable skills that complement scientific learning and research.

For those who want a strong foundation in data analysis and modeling, earning a bachelor in mathematics online offers analytical tools crucial for ecological research. Students seeking creative ways to present scientific findings might consider online graphic design programs. These programs teach visualization and communication techniques useful for scientific outreach.

If you're looking for flexibility, an online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs program allows you to tailor your learning to your interests, combining ecology, policy, informatics, and more. Additionally, a cheapest online history master's degree can add a broader context to your scientific inquiries by exploring the interactions between human societies and the environment over time.

By exploring these related online degrees, students can shape unique career pathways and enhance their expertise in ecology, evolution, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Natalia Restrepo-Coupe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles