World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11326
World Ranking
5868
National Ranking
3186

Colin Phillips publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin Phillips sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Colin Phillips D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Colin Phillips is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans several fields of study, primarily focusing on Neuroscience and Psychology. Within these broader areas, their work covers subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their main research topics include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Reading and Literacy Development, Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, Language Development and Disorders, Neural dynamics and brain function, as well as Neuroscience and Music Perception.

Colin Phillips has published several papers recently, including:

  • Syntactic category constrains lexical competition in speaking (2020) in Cognition
  • Auditory Word Comprehension Is Less Incremental in Isolated Words (2022) in Neurobiology of Language
  • Why non-native speakers sometimes outperform native speakers in agreement processing (2022) in Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • Agreement attraction error and timing profiles in continuous speech (2022) in Glossa Psycholinguistics
  • When missing NPs make double center-embedding sentences acceptable (2021) in Glossa a journal of general linguistics

Their published book, released by Frontiers Media, is titled Different Ways to Help Those With Mental Illness (2020).

Colin Phillips frequently collaborates with several coauthors, notably Eun-Kyoung Rosa Lee, Margaret Kandel, Phoebe Gaston, Christian Brodbeck, and Ellen Lau.

Their work is regularly published in venues such as:

  • Cognition
  • Annual Review of Linguistics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Bilingualism Language and Cognition
  • Neurobiology of Language

Best Publications

  • A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

    Ellen F. Lau;Colin Phillips;David Poeppel;David Poeppel

  • Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes.

    Matthew W. Wagers;Ellen F. Lau;Colin Phillips

  • Linear Order and Constituency

    Colin Phillips

  • ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies

    Colin Phillips;Nina Kazanina;Shani H. Abada

  • Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence

    Brian Dillon;Alan Mishler;Shayne Sloggett;Colin Phillips

  • Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study

    Colin Phillips;Thomas Pellathy;Alec Marantz;Elron Yellin

  • A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects

    Jon Sprouse;Matt Wagers;Colin Phillips

  • Order and structure

    Colin Phillips

  • The linguistic processes underlying the P600

    Ana C. Gouvea;Colin Phillips;Nina Kazanina;David Poeppel

  • The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis.

    Ellen Lau;Clare Stroud;Silke Plesch;Colin Phillips

  • The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena

    Colin Phillips

  • Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language

    Sachiko Aoshima;Sachiko Aoshima;Colin Phillips;Amy Weinberg

  • Syntax at Age Two: Cross-Linguistic Differences 1

    Colin Phillips

  • Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence

    Ming Xiang;Brian Dillon;Colin Phillips

  • 5: Grammatical Illusions and Selective Fallibility in Real-Time Language Comprehension

    Colin Phillips;Matthew W. Wagers;Ellen F. Lau

  • Equal Treatment for All Antecedents: How Children Succeed with Principle B

    Anastasia Conroy;Eri Takahashi;Jeffrey Lidz;Collin Phillips

  • The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora

    Nina Kazanina;Ellen F. Lau;Moti Lieberman;Masaya Yoshida

  • The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sounds

    Nina Kazanina;Colin Phillips;William Idsardi

  • Aligning Grammatical Theories and Language Processing Models.

    Shevaun Lewis;Colin Phillips

  • Task-induced asymmetry of the auditory evoked M100 neuromagnetic field elicited by speech sounds.

    D. Poeppel;E. Yellin;C. Phillips;T.P.L. Roberts

  • The role of feature-number and feature-type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations.

    Andrew Ira Nevins;Brian Dillon;Shiti Malhotra;Colin Phillips

  • Relating structure and time in linguistics and psycholinguistics

    Colin Phillips;Matthew Wagers

  • Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension

    Sol Lago;Diego E. Shalom;Mariano Sigman;Ellen F. Lau

Frequent Co-Authors

David Poeppel
David Poeppel New York University
Alec Marantz
Alec Marantz New York University
Timothy P.L. Roberts
Timothy P.L. Roberts Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jeffrey Lidz
Jeffrey Lidz University of Maryland, College Park
Andrew Nevins
Andrew Nevins Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Philip Resnik
Philip Resnik University of Maryland, College Park
Yasushi Miyashita
Yasushi Miyashita Juntendo University
Claudia Felser
Claudia Felser Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids
Josep Call
Josep Call University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of academic and career opportunities across the USA. Many prospective students are interested in institutions that stand out for their program quality or popularity. For example, those researching the most popular psychology degree programs in Nashville will find options ranging from bachelor's to graduate levels, each with a unique focus on research or clinical practice.

If you are looking for highly respected psychology programs by ranking, the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Oklahoma offer a strong foundation in both theory and applied psychology, often with flexible online options. In growing metropolitan areas, the most popular psychology degree programs in Orlando appeal to those seeking practical experience and internship opportunities.

Career prospects are broad and can include roles in clinical counseling, school psychology, human resources, and organizational behavior. In emerging markets, such as the most popular psychology degree programs in Reno, students benefit from unique local industry connections and hands-on learning. With the rise of online education, these programs make it easier than ever to launch a rewarding career in psychology from anywhere in the nation.

Best Scientists Citing Colin Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles