World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 58 913 819 28 25 448 12057

Lukas Menkhoff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lukas Menkhoff between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lukas Menkhoff published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2020. 16 of the 492 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2020. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 32 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 66 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications
1985 2025

492 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lukas Menkhoff: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 3
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 7
1996 2
1997 9
1998 6
1999 2
2000 17
2001 12
2002 6
2003 13
2004 32
2005 14
2006 8
2007 12
2008 15
2009 15
2010 22
2011 20
2012 26
2013 14
2014 8
2015 13
2016 17
2017 21
2018 15
2019 33
2020 66
2021 16
2022 10
2023 12
2024 10
2025 6
Total 492
Download as CSV

Lukas Menkhoff publications per year - data summary

  • Lukas Menkhoff, a Economics and Finance scholar from German Institute for Economic Research, has 492 publications recorded across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 66 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1986, 1992 and 1994, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 41 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987 and 1989).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.6 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 54 publications, 11% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1998: 37 publications (2.6 per year); 1999-2012: 214 publications (15.3 per year); 2013-2025: 241 publications (18.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Lukas Menkhoff publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Menkhoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 447–451 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 448 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12 448
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Lukas Menkhoff publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Lukas Menkhoff, a Economics and Finance scholar from German Institute for Economic Research, records 448 publications - the 95th percentile of the discipline.
  • 95% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Lukas Menkhoff, and about 5% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Lukas Menkhoff ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Lukas Menkhoff D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lukas Menkhoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34 58
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Lukas Menkhoff D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Lukas Menkhoff, a Economics and Finance scholar from German Institute for Economic Research, records 58 D-Index - the 77th percentile of the discipline.
  • 77% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Lukas Menkhoff, and about 23% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Lukas Menkhoff ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Lukas Menkhoff is affiliated with the German Institute for Economic Research in Germany. Their primary field of study is Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with 74 publications contributing to this broad area. Subfields within their work include Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, and Information Systems.

The main topics that their research covers are:

  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Global Financial Crisis and Policies
  • Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency

Lukas Menkhoff has published extensively in multiple venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Wirtschaftsdienst
  • Econstor (Econstor)
  • Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung

Their recent papers include:

  • "Financial Education Affects Financial Knowledge and Downstream Behaviors," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "The Dynamic Impact of FX Interventions on Financial Markets," 2020, The Review of Economics and Statistics
  • "The effectiveness of FX interventions: A meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Financial Stability
  • "Active learning improves financial education: Experimental evidence from Uganda," 2022, Journal of Development Economics
  • "The Relationship between Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal

Lukas Menkhoff has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably:

  • Malte Rieth
  • Antonia Grohmann
  • Tobias Stoehr
  • Helke Seitz
  • Tim Kaiser

They have also contributed to book publications, including a title released by Springer Nature:

  • "Inflation in Deutschland und dem Euroraum - ein Überblick," 2023

Best Publications

  • Carry Trades and Global Foreign Exchange Volatility

    Lukas Menkhoff;Lucio Sarno;Maik Schmeling;Andreas Schrimpf

  • Currency Momentum Strategies

    Lukas Menkhoff;Lucio Sarno;Lucio Sarno;Lucio Sarno;Maik Schmeling;Andreas Schrimpf

  • The obstinate passion of foreign exchange professionals: Technical analysis

    Lukas Menkhoff;Mark P. Taylor

  • Does financial literacy improve financial inclusion? Cross country evidence

    Antonia Grohmann;Theres Klühs;Lukas Menkhoff

  • Does financial literacy improve financial inclusion? Cross country evidence

    Antonia Grohmann;Theres Klühs;Lukas Menkhoff;Lukas Menkhoff;Lukas Menkhoff

  • Will Women Be Women? Analyzing the Gender Difference among Financial Experts

    Daniela Beckmann;Lukas Menkhoff

  • The Use of Technical Analysis by Fund Managers: International Evidence

    Lukas Menkhoff

  • The impact of experience on risk taking, overconfidence, and herding of fund managers: Complementary survey evidence

    Lukas Menkhoff;Ulrich Schmidt;Torsten Brozynski

  • Childhood Roots of Financial Literacy

    Antonia Grohmann;Roy Kouwenberg;Lukas Menkhoff

  • Childhood roots of financial literacy

    Antonia Grohmann;Roy Kouwenberg;Roy Kouwenberg;Lukas Menkhoff;Lukas Menkhoff;Lukas Menkhoff

  • Financial education affects financial knowledge and downstream behaviors

    Tim Kaiser;Annamaria Lusardi;Lukas Menkhoff;Carly J. Urban

  • Does Financial Education Impact Financial Literacy and Financial Behavior, and If So, When?

    Tim Kaiser;Lukas Menkhoff

  • Collateral-based lending in emerging markets: Evidence from Thailand

    Lukas Menkhoff;Doris Neuberger;Chodechai Suwanaporn

  • Limit-Order Submission Strategies under Asymmetric Information

    Lukas Menkhoff;Carol L. Osler;Maik Schmeling

  • Examining the Use of Technical Currency Analysis

    Lukas Menkhoff

  • The noise trading approach — questionnaire evidence from foreign exchange

    L Menkhoff

  • EXTENDED EVIDENCE ON THE USE OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE

    Thomas Gehrig;Thomas Gehrig;Lukas Menkhoff

  • Overconfidence, experience, and professionalism: An experimental study

    Lukas Menkhoff;Maik Schmeling;Ulrich Schmidt;Ulrich Schmidt

  • When Is Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective? Evidence from 33 Countries

    Marcel Fratzscher;Oliver Gloede;Lukas Menkhoff;Lucio Sarno

  • Carry Trades and Global Foreign Exchange Volatility

    Lukas Menkhoff;Lukas Menkhoff;Lucio Sarno;Lucio Sarno;Maik Schmeling;Maik Schmeling;Andreas Schrimpf

  • HIGH‐FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE INTERVENTIONS: WHAT DO WE LEARN?

    Lukas Menkhoff

  • Collateral and its substitutes in emerging markets’ lending

    Lukas Menkhoff;Doris Neuberger;Ornsiri Rungruxsirivorn

  • Does culture influence asset managers' views and behavior?

    Daniela Beckmann;Lukas Menkhoff;Megumi Suto

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Schmidt
Ulrich Schmidt Kiel Institute for the World Economy
Lucio Sarno
Lucio Sarno University of Cambridge
Ronald MacDonald
Ronald MacDonald University of Glasgow
Marcel Fratzscher
Marcel Fratzscher German Institute for Economic Research
Andreas Schrimpf
Andreas Schrimpf Bank for International Settlements
Annamaria Lusardi
Annamaria Lusardi Stanford University
Mark P. Taylor
Mark P. Taylor Washington University in St. Louis
Helmut Reisen
Helmut Reisen University of Basel
Gunther Schnabl
Gunther Schnabl Leipzig University
Alfons J. Weichenrieder
Alfons J. Weichenrieder Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Economics and Finance opens up multiple career pathways. Many students now opt for accelerated finance degrees to fast-track their entry into competitive financial sectors. These programs are designed for those who want to complete their undergraduate studies quickly and efficiently.

Pursuing the quickest mba program is another popular choice for advancing into leadership roles. Accelerated MBAs can help professionals develop managerial skills essential for growth in finance, consulting, or banking—often in as little as 12-18 months.

For those looking to build foundational accounting skills, the best online bookkeeping courses offer flexible, short-term options to start a career in bookkeeping or small business finance. These certificate programs are ideal for developing practical, job-ready expertise.

Additionally, office management degrees provide a broader administrative background, preparing graduates for roles that integrate finance, operations, and team management. Whether you’re looking to specialize or gain broad business skills, online degrees offer flexibility and access to diverse career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Lukas Menkhoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles