World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
15906
World Ranking
12363
National Ranking
5291

William E. Theurkauf publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Theurkauf sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 98 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

William E. Theurkauf D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Theurkauf sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Theurkauf is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in the United States. Their research spans several areas within agricultural and biological sciences, as well as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Theurkauf's work also touches on subfields such as plant science, molecular biology, immunology, agronomy and crop science, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Plant Virus Research Studies
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research

Theurkauf has contributed to the academic literature with publications in several high-profile venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Nature Communications
  • Cell Reports
  • Developmental Cell

Theurkauf's recent papers exemplify a focus on genetic variations, transposon biology, and piRNA pathways. Selected publications include:

  • "A benchmark and an algorithm for detecting germline transposon insertions and measuring de novo transposon insertion frequencies," 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "Long first exons and epigenetic marks distinguish conserved pachytene piRNA clusters from other mammalian genes," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Adaptive Evolution Targets a piRNA Precursor Transcription Network," 2020, Cell Reports
  • "Epigenetic and chromosomal features drive transposon insertion in Drosophila melanogaster," 2023, Nucleic Acids Research
  • "piRNA-independent transposon silencing by the Drosophila THO complex," 2021, Developmental Cell

Theurkauf collaborates frequently with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including Zhiping Weng, Tianxiong Yu, Samantha Ho, Nicholas Rice, and Gen Zhang.

Best Publications

  • Biogenesis and germline functions of piRNAs.

    Carla Andrea Klattenhoff;William E. Theurkauf

  • Normal microRNA Maturation and Germ-Line Stem Cell Maintenance Requires Loquacious, a Double-Stranded RNA-Binding Domain Protein

    Klaus Forstemann;Yukihide Tomari;Tingting Du;Vasily V. Vagin

  • Collapse of Germline piRNAs in the Absence of Argonaute3 Reveals Somatic piRNAs in Flies

    Chengjian Li;Vasily V. Vagin;Soohyun Lee;Soohyun Lee;Jia Xu;Jia Xu

  • Reorganization of the cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis: implications for axis specification and intercellular transport.

    W. E. Theurkauf;S. Smiley;Mei Lie Wong;B. M. Alberts

  • Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein.

    W E Theurkauf;R S Hawley

  • RISC assembly defects in the Drosophila RNAi mutant armitage.

    Yukihide Tomari;Tingting Du;Benjamin Haley;Dianne S Schwarz

  • Distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 in the nervous system of the rat studied by immunofluorescence

    P. De Camilli;P. De Camilli;P.E. Miller;F. Navone;W.E. Theurkauf

  • The Drosophila HP1 Homolog Rhino Is Required for Transposon Silencing and piRNA Production by Dual-Strand Clusters

    Carla Andrea Klattenhoff;Hualin Xi;Hualin Xi;Hualin Xi;Chengjian Li;Soohyun Lee;Soohyun Lee

  • Molecular characterization of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase bound to microtubule-associated protein 2.

    W E Theurkauf;R B Vallee

  • Drosophila rasiRNA Pathway Mutations Disrupt Embryonic Axis Specification through Activation of an ATR/Chk2 DNA Damage Response

    Carla Klattenhoff;Diana P. Bratu;Diana P. Bratu;Nadine McGinnis-Schultz;Birgit S. Koppetsch

  • A central role for microtubules in the differentiation of Drosophila oocytes.

    W. E. Theurkauf;B. M. Alberts;Yuh Nung Jan;T. A. Jongens

  • DNA-replication checkpoint control at the Drosophila midblastula transition

    Ody C. M. Sibon;Victoria A. Stevenson;William E. Theurkauf

  • Centrosomes in cellular regulation.

    Stephen Doxsey;Dannel McCollum;William Theurkauf

  • The Drosophila SDE3 homolog armitage is required for oskar mRNA silencing and embryonic axis specification

    Heather A Cook;Birgit S Koppetsch;Jing Wu;William E Theurkauf

  • CPEB, maskin, and cyclin B1 mRNA at the mitotic apparatus: implications for local translational control of cell division.

    Irina Groisman;Yi-Shuian Huang;Raul Mendez;Quiping Cao

  • A protein kinase bound to the projection portion of MAP 2 (microtubule-associated protein 2)

    RB Vallee;MJ DiBartolomeis;WE Theurkauf

  • Anastral meiotic spindle morphogenesis: role of the non-claret disjunctional kinesin-like protein.

    H. J. G. Matthies;H. B. Mcdonald;L. S. B. Goldstein;W. E. Theurkauf

  • Drosophila checkpoint kinase 2 couples centrosome function and spindle assembly to genomic integrity.

    Saeko Takada;Anju Kelkar;William E. Theurkauf

  • Adaptation to P Element Transposon Invasion in Drosophila melanogaster

    Jaspreet S. Khurana;Jie Wang;Jia Xu;Birgit S. Koppetsch

  • A central role for microtubules in the differentiation of Drosophila oocytes : Development 118, 1169–1180

    W.E. Theurkauf;B.M. Alberts;Y.N. Jan;T.A. Jongens

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhiping Weng
Zhiping Weng University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Phillip D. Zamore
Phillip D. Zamore University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
R. Scott Hawley
R. Scott Hawley Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Bruce Alberts
Bruce Alberts University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey D. Jensen
Jeffrey D. Jensen Arizona State University
William J. Sullivan
William J. Sullivan Indiana University
Lynn Cooley
Lynn Cooley Yale University
Yuh Nung Jan
Yuh Nung Jan University of California, San Francisco
Scott Waddell
Scott Waddell University of Oxford
Yukihide Tomari
Yukihide Tomari University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens diverse opportunities, including healthcare management and medical coding. Many students explore advanced education, such as the cheapest online MBA healthcare programs, to deepen their knowledge and boost leadership potential in medical and laboratory settings.

For those interested in healthcare data, certifications like Certified Professional Coder (CPC) and Certified Coding Specialist (CCS) are valuable. Understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc certification can help you choose the right path for your career goals, taking into account factors such as certification costs and potential salary prospects.

Medical coding is a growing field with solid earning potential. The certified medical coder salary reflects high demand for professionals skilled in translating medical information for billing and data purposes.

If you are considering this route, it’s essential to weigh the is medical billing and coding a good career advantages, such as job flexibility and remote opportunities, against challenges like repetitive tasks and ongoing certification requirements.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Theurkauf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles