World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
José A.F.O. Correia

José A.F.O. Correia

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
8648
World Ranking
4580
National Ranking
25

José A.F.O. Correia publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A.F.O. Correia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 403 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

José A.F.O. Correia D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A.F.O. Correia sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

José A.F.O. Correia is affiliated with the University of Porto in Portugal and has concentrated research activity mainly in the field of engineering, with a specific focus on mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, and civil and structural engineering. Their interdisciplinary research spans several subfields including materials chemistry and building and construction.

The scientist's work primarily addresses topics related to fatigue and fracture mechanics, structural load-bearing analysis, and mechanical stress and fatigue analysis. Additional key research areas include structural behavior of reinforced concrete, concrete corrosion and durability, probabilistic and robust engineering design, and material properties and failure mechanisms.

José A.F.O. Correia has contributed to a range of peer-reviewed publications and book chapters. Their recent papers include:

  • "Recent advances on notch effects in metal fatigue: A review" (2020), published in Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
  • "Fatigue life prediction of metallic materials considering mean stress effects by means of an artificial neural network" (2020), published in International Journal of Fatigue
  • "Defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM materials: Size effect and probabilistic prospects" (2022), published in International Journal of Fatigue
  • "Kriging-assisted hybrid reliability design and optimization of offshore wind turbine support structure based on a portfolio allocation strategy" (2024), published in Ocean Engineering
  • "Three-dimensional fatigue crack propagation simulation using extended finite element methods for steel grades S355 and S690 considering mean stress effects" (2020), published in Engineering Structures

Their publication record includes significant contributions to journals such as the International Journal of Fatigue, Engineering Failure Analysis, Structures, Procedia Structural Integrity, and the International Journal of Structural Integrity.

Correia has frequently collaborated with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Abílio M.P. De Jesus
  • Grzegorz Lesiuk
  • Filippo Berto
  • Shun-Peng Zhu
  • Haohui Xin

In addition to journal papers, José A.F.O. Correia has authored several books published by Springer International Publishing. Notable titles include:

  • Degradation Theory of Long Term Operated Materials and Structures (2021)
  • Structural Integrity and Fatigue Failure Analysis (2022)
  • Advances in Computational Mechanics and Applications (2024)
  • Analytical and Experimental Methods in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (2024)
  • Advances in Structural Mechanics and Applications (2022)

Best Publications

  • Defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM materials: Size effect and probabilistic prospects

    Unknown

  • Recent advances on notch effects in metal fatigue: A review

    Ding Liao;Shun‐Peng Zhu;José A.F.O. Correia;Abílio M.P. De Jesus

  • Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials

    Shun-Peng Zhu;Shun-Peng Zhu;Zheng-Yong Yu;José Correia;Abílio De Jesus

  • Probabilistic modeling of fatigue life distribution and size effect of components with random defects

    Y. Ai;S.P. Zhu;S.P. Zhu;D. Liao;J.A.F.O. Correia

  • Fatigue life prediction of metallic materials considering mean stress effects by means of an artificial neural network

    Joelton Fonseca Barbosa;Joelton Fonseca Barbosa;José A.F.O. Correia;R.C.S. Freire Júnior;Abílio M.P. De Jesus

  • Kriging-assisted hybrid reliability design and optimization of offshore wind turbine support structure based on a portfolio allocation strategy

    Unknown

  • Probabilistic fatigue modelling of metallic materials under notch and size effect using the weakest link theory

    Unknown

  • Generalized probabilistic model allowing for various fatigue damage variables

    José Correia;Nicole Apetre;Attilio Arcari;Abílio De Jesus

  • Fatigue assessment of a riveted shear splice based on a probabilistic model

    Abílio M.P. De Jesus;Hernán Pinto;Alfonso Fernández-Canteli;Enrique Castillo

  • Intelligent-inspired framework for fatigue reliability evaluation of offshore wind turbine support structures under hybrid uncertainty

    Unknown

  • Probabilistic modelling of notch fatigue and size effect of components using highly stressed volume approach

    Yang Ai;Shun-Peng Zhu;Shun-Peng Zhu;Ding Liao;José A.F.O. Correia

  • Three-dimensional fatigue crack propagation simulation using extended finite element methods for steel grades S355 and S690 considering mean stress effects

    Haohui Xin;Haohui Xin;José A.F.O. Correia;José A.F.O. Correia;Milan Veljkovic

  • Computational framework for multiaxial fatigue life prediction of compressor discs considering notch effects

    Ding Liao;Shun-Peng Zhu;José A.F.O. Correia;Abílio M.P. De Jesus

  • A probabilistic fatigue approach for riveted joints using Monte Carlo simulation

    Rui F. Sanches;Abílio M.P. de Jesus;Abílio M.P. de Jesus;José A.F.O. Correia;José A.F.O. Correia;A.L.L. da Silva;A.L.L. da Silva

  • Stress gradient effect in metal fatigue: Review and solutions

    Unknown

  • Recent advances on size effect in metal fatigue under defects: a review

    Shun-Peng Zhu;Yang Ai;Ding Liao;Ding Liao;José A. F. O. Correia

  • Fatigue reliability of wind turbines: Historical perspectives, recent developments and future prospects

    Unknown

  • Strain-life and crack propagation fatigue data from several Portuguese old metallic riveted bridges

    Abílio M.P. de Jesus;António L.L. da Silva;Miguel V. Figueiredo;José A.F.O. Correia

  • Local unified probabilistic model for fatigue crack initiation and propagation: Application to a notched geometry

    José A.F.O. Correia;Abílio M.P. De Jesus;Alfonso Fernández-Canteli

  • Nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation: Isodamage curve-based model and life prediction aspects

    Shun-Peng Zhu;Shun-Peng Zhu;Ding Liao;Qiang Liu;José A.F.O. Correia

  • Non-contact structural displacement measurement using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and video-based systems

    D. Ribeiro;R. Santos;R. Cabral;G. Saramago

  • Fatigue life prediction based on an equivalent initial flaw size approach and a new normalized fatigue crack growth model

    J.A.F.O. Correia;S. Blasón;A.M.P. De Jesus;A.F. Canteli

  • Nonlinear fatigue damage accumulation and life prediction of metals: A comparative study

    Shun‐Peng Zhu;Yong‐Zhen Hao;José A.F. de Oliveira Correia;Grzegorz Lesiuk

  • Fatigue of riveted and bolted joints made of puddle iron—An experimental approach

    Abílio M.P. de Jesus;António L.L. da Silva;José A.F.O. Correia

  • A generalization of the fatigue Kohout-Věchet model for several fatigue damage parameters

    J.A.F.O. Correia;P. Raposo;M. Muniz-Calvente;S. Blasón

  • Crack Closure Effects on Fatigue Crack Propagation Rates: Application of a Proposed Theoretical Model

    José A. F. O. Correia;Abílio M. P. De Jesus;Pedro M. G. P. Moreira;Paulo J. S. Tavares

  • Integrated study of triboelectric nanogenerator for ocean wave energy harvesting: Performance assessment in realistic sea conditions

    C. Rodrigues;M. Ramos;R. Esteves;J. Correia

  • In-situ SEM investigation on fatigue behaviors of additive manufactured Al-Si10-Mg alloy at elevated temperature

    Zhen Wang;Wenwang Wu;Guian Qian;Lijuan Sun

Frequent Co-Authors

Abílio M.P. De Jesus
Abílio M.P. De Jesus University of Porto
Rui Calçada
Rui Calçada University of Porto
Shun-Peng Zhu
Shun-Peng Zhu University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Filippo Berto
Filippo Berto Sapienza University of Rome
Behrooz Keshtegar
Behrooz Keshtegar Zabol University
Nicholas Fantuzzi
Nicholas Fantuzzi University of Bologna
Jun He
Jun He University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Luís Simões da Silva
Luís Simões da Silva University of Coimbra
Humberto Varum
Humberto Varum University of Porto
Luca Susmel
Luca Susmel University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to dozens of flexible and rewarding educational options. Many students are looking for programs that offer both strong job prospects and schedule flexibility, especially with the rising demand for certifications that pay well.

If you need to balance family commitments, there are also excellent online degrees for stay at home moms. These programs are tailored for busy parents, allowing you to study at your own pace without sacrificing quality or career potential.

For those seeking to upskill quickly, some colleges offer 6 week courses that provide fast-track options into technical and engineering fields. These short, intensive courses let you gain foundational knowledge rapidly and are ideal for busy learners.

If you want to enter the workforce as fast as possible, consider accelerated finance degree programs online, which can often be completed in a fraction of the time of traditional degrees. These pathways help you achieve your career goals efficiently, offering both flexibility and robust job market alignment.

Best Scientists Citing José A.F.O. Correia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles