World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
18659
World Ranking
5790
National Ranking
3137

Steve M. Jex publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve M. Jex sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steve M. Jex D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve M. Jex sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve M. Jex is affiliated with Bowling Green State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with a particular focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist addresses topics related to Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Employment and Welfare Studies, Workplace Violence and Bullying, Workplace Health and Well-being, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Emotional Labor in Professions, and Work-Family Balance Challenges.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Juseob Lee, Ian M. Hughes, Kristin A. Horan, Wheeler Nakahara, and Richard A. Currie. The primary venues in which their work has appeared are Stress and Health, Work Aging and Retirement, Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology, and the International Journal of Hospitality Management.

Recent papers by Steve M. Jex include:

  • A Review of the Challenge-Hindrance Stress Model: Recent Advances, Expanded Paradigms, and Recommendations for Future Research (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • The relationship between stressors of temporary work and counterproductive work behaviour (2020, Stress and Health)
  • Older and Less Deviant? The Paths Through Emotional Labor and Organizational Cynicism (2020, Work Aging and Retirement)
  • Change of heart, change of mind, or change of willpower? Explaining the dynamic relationship between experienced and perpetrated incivility change. (2021, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology)
  • When does cognitive crafting matter more in enhancing employee thriving at work? The moderating role of skill variety and job autonomy (2023, Stress and Health)

Best Publications

  • Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory

    Paul E. Spector;Steve M. Jex

  • Organizational Psychology : A Scientist-Practitioner Approach

    Steve M. Jex;Thomas W. Britt

  • Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study.

    Steve M. Jex;Paul D. Bliese

  • Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover

    Craig D. Crossley;Rebecca J. Bennett;Steve M. Jex;Jennifer L. Burnfield

  • Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance.

    Terry A. Beehr;Steve M. Jex;Beth A. Stacy;Marshall A. Murray

  • Relation of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: a comparison of multiple data sources.

    Paul E. Spector;Daniel J. Dwyer;Steve M. Jex

  • The impact of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relations: coping style as an explanatory mechanism.

    Steve M. Jex;Paul D. Bliese;Sheri Buzzell;Jessica Primeau

  • The employee as a punching bag: The effect of multiple sources of incivility on employee withdrawal behavior and sales performance

    Michael Sliter;Katherine Sliter;Steve Jex

  • How rude! Emotional labor as a mediator between customer incivility and employee outcomes.

    Michael Sliter;Steve Jex;Katherine Wolford;Joanne McInnerney

  • Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: The role of communication technology use at home.

    Young Ah Park;Charlotte Fritz;Steve M. Jex

  • Development and Validation of Scores on a Two-Dimensional Workplace Friendship Scale

    Ivy K. Nielsen;Steve M. Jex;Gary A. Adams

  • Relationships between time management, control, work-family conflict, and strain.

    Gary A. Adams;Steve M. Jex

  • Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health

    Paul E. Spector;Steve M. Jex

  • Coworker incivility and incivility targets' work effort and counterproductive work behaviors: the moderating role of supervisor social support.

    Kenji Sakurai;Steve M. Jex

  • Incorporating a multilevel perspective into occupational stress research: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications.

    Paul D. Bliese;Steve M. Jex

  • The meaning of occupational stress items to survey respondents.

    Steve M. Jex;Terry A. Beehr;Cathlyn K. Roberts

  • Work-Home Boundary Management Using Communication and Information Technology

    Young Ah Park;Steve M. Jex

  • The Relation of Job Control with Job Strains: A Comparison of Multiple Data Sources

    Cong Liu;Paul E. Spector;Steve M. Jex

  • The nursing incivility scale: development and validation of an occupation-specific measure.

    Ashley M. Guidroz;Jennifer L. Burnfield-Geimer;Olga L. Clark;Heather M. Schwetschenau

  • Time management as a moderator of relations between stressors and employee strain

    Steve M. Jex;Tina C. Elacqua

  • "Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover": Clarification to Crossley et al. (2007).

    Craig D. Crossley;Rebecca J. Bennett;Steve M. Jex;Jennifer L. Burnfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul D. Bliese
Paul D. Bliese University of South Carolina
Paul E. Spector
Paul E. Spector University of South Florida
Jeffrey L. Thomas
Jeffrey L. Thomas United States Army Research Laboratory
Russell A. Matthews
Russell A. Matthews University of Alabama
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Thomas W. Britt
Thomas W. Britt Clemson University
Daniel G. Bachrach
Daniel G. Bachrach University of Alabama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in Alabama and across other states can open up flexible learning paths for students. Accredited online programs offer the same quality of education as their on-campus counterparts, making it possible for learners to balance studies with work or personal commitments. Prospective students can compare program features, tuition rates, and graduation outcomes to find the ideal fit for their goals.

Many universities offer specialized programs across the country. For those considering the Midwest, several top-rated online psychology bachelor’s degrees in Illinois provide robust preparation for further study or entry-level roles. In the Northeast, students looking for top institutions can browse the best online psychology bachelor’s degree rankings in New York to identify leading options.

Bachelor’s degrees in psychology are often stepping stones to careers in mental health, social services, education, or business. To help identify quality options, check out the best online psychology bachelor’s program rankings in Cincinnati. Online programs can also serve as a foundation for graduate study, leading to licensure or advanced clinical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Steve M. Jex

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles