World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
28665
World Ranking
2431
National Ranking
1411

Paul D. Bliese publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Bliese sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 197 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul D. Bliese D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul D. Bliese sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul D. Bliese is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with specific contributions to subfields including Clinical Psychology, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their recent scholarly output includes the following papers:

  • Sleep leadership in the army: A group randomized trial, 2020, published in Sleep Health
  • Intrusive Traumatic Reexperiencing: Pathognomonic of the Psychological Response to Traumatic Stress, 2021, published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Tracking the Process of Resilience: How Emotional Stability and Experience Influence Exhaustion and Commitment Trajectories, 2021, published in Group & Organization Management
  • Hitting the mark: The influence of emotional culture on resilient performance., 2021, published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Unit cohesion during deployment and post-deployment mental health: is cohesion an individual- or unit-level buffer for combat-exposed soldiers?, 2020, published in Psychological Medicine

The coauthors who frequently collaborate with Paul D. Bliese include:

  • Amy B. Adler
  • Patrick J. Flynn
  • Marc Gruber
  • Yair Bar-Haim
  • Laura Campbell-Sills

Their contributions are published often in venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Academy of Management Journal
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Psychological Medicine

Regarding main topics of research, Paul D. Bliese has explored areas including:

  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Sleep and related disorders

Best Publications

  • Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.

    Paul D. Bliese

  • Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study.

    Steve M. Jex;Paul D. Bliese

  • The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity.

    Gilad Chen;Paul D. Bliese

  • Validating the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist with soldiers returning from combat.

    Paul D. Bliese;Kathleen M. Wright;Amy B. Adler;Oscar Cabrera

  • The Power of Momentum: A New Model of Dynamic Relationships between Job Satisfaction Change and Turnover Intentions

    Gilad Chen;Robert E. Ployhart;Helena Cooper Thomas;Neil Anderson

  • The impact of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relations: coping style as an explanatory mechanism.

    Steve M. Jex;Paul D. Bliese;Sheri Buzzell;Jessica Primeau

  • Battlemind debriefing and battlemind training as early interventions with soldiers returning from Iraq: Randomization by platoon.

    Amy B. Adler;Paul D. Bliese;Dennis McGurk;Charles W. Hoge

  • Individual Adaptability (I-ADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability

    Robert E. Ployhart;Paul D. Bliese

  • Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as though They Were Independent

    Paul D. Bliese;Paul J. Hanges

  • The big five personality traits and individual job performance growth trajectories in maintenance and transitional job stages.

    Carl J. Thoresen;Jill C. Bradley;Paul D. Bliese;Joseph D. Thoresen

  • Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

    Katherine J. Klein;Paul D. Bliese;Steve W. Kozlowski;Fred Dansereau

  • Stress and well-being at work: A century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences.

    Paul D. Bliese;Jeffrey R. Edwards;Sabine Sonnentag

  • Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support.

    Paul D. Bliese;Carl Andrew Castro

  • Childhood Adversity and Combat as Predictors of Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress in Deployed Troops

    Oscar A. Cabrera;Charles W. Hoge;Paul D. Bliese;Carl A. Castro

  • Relationship of combat experiences to alcohol misuse among U.S. soldiers returning from the Iraq war.

    Joshua E. Wilk;Paul D. Bliese;Paul Y. Kim;Jeffrey L. Thomas

  • Military leadership: A context specific review $

    Leonard Wong;Paul Bliese;Dennis McGurk

  • Book Review: Modeling Longitudinal and Multilevel Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples, edited by T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, and J. Baumert (2000). Mahwah, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Paul D. Bliese

  • Social support, group consensus and stressor–strain relationships: Social context matters.

    Paul D. Bliese;Thomas W. Britt

  • Comparative utility of instruments for monitoring sleepiness‐related performance decrements in the operational environment

    Thomas J. Balkin;Paul D. Bliese;Gregory Belenky;Helen Sing

  • Incorporating a multilevel perspective into occupational stress research: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications.

    Paul D. Bliese;Steve M. Jex

  • The Impact of Deployment Length and Experience on the Well-Being of Male and Female Soldiers

    Amy B. Adler;Ann H. Huffman;Paul D. Bliese;Carl Andrew Castro

Frequent Co-Authors

Amy B. Adler
Amy B. Adler Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Carl A. Castro
Carl A. Castro University of Southern California
Jeffrey L. Thomas
Jeffrey L. Thomas United States Army Research Laboratory
Thomas W. Britt
Thomas W. Britt Clemson University
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Robert J. Ursano
Robert J. Ursano Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Nancy A. Sampson
Nancy A. Sampson Harvard University
Murray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein University of California, San Diego
Amy E. Street
Amy E. Street VA Boston Healthcare System
Anthony J. Rosellini
Anthony J. Rosellini Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online degree in psychology can open doors to a wide range of career options in counseling, research, human services, and more. With flexibility and accessibility, online programs are a popular choice for students across the United States.

One of the key factors when choosing a program is affordability. Thankfully, there are many budget-friendly choices. For students in Georgia, the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Georgia offer quality education without a high price tag. Minnesota residents can take advantage of affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in Minnesota for flexible and wallet-friendly options.

Similarly, those seeking programs in New York can explore affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in New York that make higher education accessible to more learners. Students in the southern states are not left behind, as the cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree in the South provides excellent opportunities for affordable learning as well.

With these accessible online degree options, students can start their journey toward fulfilling career pathways in psychology, regardless of their location or budget.

Best Scientists Citing Paul D. Bliese

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles