World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
8217
World Ranking
7205
National Ranking
3146

Robert L. Galloway publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Galloway sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert L. Galloway D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Galloway sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert L. Galloway is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a specialization in biomedical engineering and radiation. The scientist's work covers technical aspects of advanced imaging and radiotherapy.

The main topics Robert L. Galloway has contributed to include:

  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology

Notable recent papers authored by Galloway include:

  • "A Safe Framework for Quantitative In Vivo Human Evaluation of Image Guidance" (2023), published in the IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology
  • "Challenges in image-guided therapy system design" (2020), published by UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Galloway span a range of researchers in related biomedical fields, such as:

  • Piper C. Cannon
  • James M. Ferguson
  • E. Pitt
  • Jason Shrand
  • Shaan Setia

The majority of their publications have appeared in venues including:

  • IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers

    C.R. Maurer;J.M. Fitzpatrick;M.Y. Wang;R.L. Galloway

  • Interactive image-guided surgical system for displaying images corresponding to the placement of a surgical tool or the like

    George S. Allen;Robert L. Galloway;Robert J. Maciunas;A. Edwards Ii Charles

  • The Application Accuracy of Stereotactic Frames

    Robert J. Maciunas;Robert L. Galloway;Jim W. Latimer

  • Automatic ultrasonic localization of targets implanted in a portion of the anatomy

    Judith T. Lewis;Robert L. Galloway

  • Interactive Image-Guided Neurosurgery

    R.L. Galloway;R.J. Maciunas;C.A. Edwards

  • Method and apparatus for collecting and processing physical space data for use while performing image-guided surgery

    Robert L. Galloway;William C. Chapman;James D. Stefansic;Alan J. Herline

  • Cortical surface registration for image-guided neurosurgery using laser-range scanning

    M.I. Miga;T.K. Sinha;D.M. Cash;R.L. Galloway

  • Apparatus and methods of compensating for organ deformation, registration of internal structures to images, and applications of same

    Michael I. Miga;Logan W. Clements;Robert L. Galloway

  • Interactive image-guided surgical system.

    George S. Allen;Robert L. Galloway;Robert J. Maciunas;II Charles A. Edwards

  • Concepts and Preliminary Data Toward the Realization of Image-guided Liver Surgery

    David M. Cash;David M. Cash;Michael I. Miga;Sean C. Glasgow;Benoit M. Dawant

  • Image-guided surgery: preliminary feasibility studies of frameless stereotactic liver surgery.

    Alan J. Herline;James D. Stefansic;Jacob P. Debelak;Steven L. Hartmann

  • Apparatus and method for bone surface-based registration of physical space with tomographic images and for guiding an instrument relative to anatomical sites in the image

    Wayne A. Bass;Robert L. Galloway;Calvin R. Maurer;Robert J. Maciunas

  • Beam calibration without a phantom for creating a 3-D freehand ultrasound system.

    Diane M. Muratore;Robert L. Galloway

  • Compensating for intraoperative soft-tissue deformations using incomplete surface data and finite elements

    D.M. Cash;M.I. Miga;T.K. Sinha;R.L. Galloway

  • Surface registration for use in interactive, image-guided liver surgery.

    Alan J. Herline;Jeannette L. Herring;James D. Stefansic;William C. Chapman

  • The accuracies of four stereotactic frame systems: an independent assessment.

    Galloway Rl;Maciunas Rj;Latimer Jw

  • Method and apparatus for calibration, tracking and volume construction data for use in image-guided procedures

    Alan Herline;John Warmath;Philip Bao;Robert Galloway

  • Robust surface registration using salient anatomical features for image-guided liver surgery: Algorithm and validation

    Logan W. Clements;William C. Chapman;Benoit M. Dawant;Robert L. Galloway

  • Registration of physical space to laparoscopic image space for use in minimally invasive hepatic surgery

    J.D. Stefansic;A.J. Herline;Y. Shyr;W.C. Chapman

  • The process and development of image-guided procedures

    Robert L. Galloway

  • Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers

    Calvin R. Maurer;J. Michael Fitzpatrick;Matthew Yang Wang;Robert L. Galloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael I. Miga
Michael I. Miga Vanderbilt University
Benoit M. Dawant
Benoit M. Dawant Vanderbilt University
William C. Chapman
William C. Chapman Washington University in St. Louis
Bennett A. Landman
Bennett A. Landman Vanderbilt University
J. Michael Fitzpatrick
J. Michael Fitzpatrick Vanderbilt University
Calvin R. Maurer
Calvin R. Maurer Stanford University
Robert J. Webster
Robert J. Webster Vanderbilt University
Terry M. Peters
Terry M. Peters University of Western Ontario
George A. Ojemann
George A. Ojemann University of Washington
William O. Whetsell
William O. Whetsell Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens a range of related online degrees and flexible career pathways. For those seeking an accelerated route, consider exploring the quickest cheapest masters degree programs. These allow you to boost your credentials rapidly and affordably.

Choosing a degree that aligns with industry demand is essential for long-term career success. Many students and professionals opt for the most valuable masters degrees, which can significantly enhance job prospects and salary outcomes in the technology sector.

For those just starting their journey or looking to upskill, online associate degree programs offer a practical foundation in Computer Science and related fields. These programs are ideal for gaining essential skills while keeping costs manageable.

Additionally, finding cheap online colleges can help minimize student debt and make higher education more accessible. By exploring these various online pathways, you can find a program that fits your goals, budget, and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Galloway

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles