World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
J. Michael Fitzpatrick

J. Michael Fitzpatrick

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
12313
World Ranking
4789
National Ranking
2229

J. Michael Fitzpatrick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Michael Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 168 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

J. Michael Fitzpatrick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Michael Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

J. Michael Fitzpatrick is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple specialized domains and are reflected in publications across notable scientific venues.

Their recent papers include:

  • Clinical Implementation of Second-generation Minimally Invasive Image-guided Cochlear Implantation Surgery, 2021, Otology & Neurotology
  • 348 WHAT IS THE OLDER PATIENT'S VIEW ON RECEIVING DETAILED MEDICAL LETTERS?, 2022, Age and Ageing
  • 2217 Experiences of older residents in anticipation of transitioning to a new nursing home, 2024, Age and Ageing
  • 2832 Understanding the experiences of older residents required to relocate from one nursing home to another: a qualitative study, 2025, Age and Ageing

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • SY Yau
  • Young-Kook Lee
  • CK Pang
  • Ruth Harris
  • MW Wan

Common publication venues associated with Fitzpatrick's work are:

  • Age and Ageing
  • Otology & Neurotology

The scientist's research intersects several subfields, including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • General Health Professions

Key topics in Fitzpatrick's research are:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

In recognition of their contributions, Fitzpatrick was named an SPIE Fellow in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Retrospective Intermodality Brain Image Registration Techniques

    West J;Fitzpatrick Jm;Wang My;Dawant Bm

  • Measurement of Intraoperative Brain Surface Deformation Under a Craniotomy

    Calvin R. Maurer;Derek L. G. Hill;Robert J. Maciunas;John A. Barwise

  • The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration

    J.M. Fitzpatrick;J.B. West

  • Genetic Algorithms in Noisy Environments

    J. Michael Fitzpatrick;John J. Grefenstette

  • Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques

    Jay B. West;J. Michael Fitzpatrick;Matthew Yang Wang;Benoit M. Dawant

  • Automatic technique for localizing externally attached fiducial markers in volume images of the head

    Matthew Y. Wang;Calvin R. Maurer;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Method for determining the location in physical space of a point of fiducial marker that is selectively detachable to a base

    J. Michael Fitzpatrick;Jennifer J. McCrory

  • Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 2. Medical Image Processing and Analysis

    Milan Sonka;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces [image-guided surgery]

    C.R. Maurer;R.J. Maciunas;J.M. Fitzpatrick

  • Apparatus and method for registration of images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces

    Calvin R. Maurer;Robert J. Maciunas;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Registration of 3-D images using weighted geometrical features

    C.R. Maurer;G.B. Aboutanos;B.M. Dawant;R.J. Maciunas

  • Medical image processing and analysis

    Milan Sonka;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Localization cap for fiducial markers

    J. Michael Fitzpatrick;Jennifer J. McCrory

  • The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design

    Amir Aghamousa;Francisco Prada;Ginevra Favole;Klaus Honscheid

  • Retrospective intermodality registration techniques for images of the head: surface-based versus volume-based

    J. West;J.M. Fitzpatrick;M.Y. Wang;B.M. Dawant

  • Genetic Search with Approximate Function Evaluation

    John J. Grefenstette;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain

    J.M. Fitzpatrick;D.L.G. Hill;Y. Shyr;J. West

  • An automatic technique for finding and localizing externally attached markers in CT and MR volume images of the head

    Unknown

  • On the Generation of Skeletons from Discrete Euclidean Distance Maps

    Unknown

  • Genetic Algorithms in Noisy Environments

    Unknown

  • Fiducial registration error and target registration error are uncorrelated

    J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Convergent Iterative Closest-Point Algorithm to Accomodate Anisotropic and Inhomogenous Localization Error

    L. Maier-Hein;A. M. Franz;T. R. dos Santos;M. Schmidt

  • Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy?

    Robert F. Labadie;Bryan M. Davis;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers

    Calvin R. Maurer;J. Michael Fitzpatrick;Matthew Yang Wang;Robert L. Galloway

Frequent Co-Authors

Benoit M. Dawant
Benoit M. Dawant Vanderbilt University
Calvin R. Maurer
Calvin R. Maurer Stanford University
Robert J. Webster
Robert J. Webster Vanderbilt University
Robert L. Galloway
Robert L. Galloway Vanderbilt University
Milan Sonka
Milan Sonka University of Iowa
Robert M. Kessler
Robert M. Kessler University of Alabama at Birmingham
Derek L. G. Hill
Derek L. G. Hill Panoramic Digital Health
Victoria L. Morgan
Victoria L. Morgan Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Timothy C. Beers
Timothy C. Beers University of Notre Dame
George F. Smoot
George F. Smoot Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often opens doors to a range of related STEM fields. Students interested in broadening their skills and career options can consider online programs in areas such as engineering, data science, and physics. These disciplines frequently overlap with computer science, providing valuable skills for technology-focused roles.

For example, gaining expertise through the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs can enhance problem-solving abilities and an understanding of physical systems. Students fascinated by theoretical foundations may benefit from online physics degrees, which can lead to careers in research or technical industries.

If you’re drawn to analytics and data, pursuing the cheapest data science degree is a smart move, as data science is increasingly vital across many tech-driven fields. Alternatively, those ready for a specialized engineering path can review the online electrical engineering degree ranking to find recognized and flexible programs.

Expanding your education in these related online degrees can significantly enhance your qualifications and open up a wider array of career pathways within the rapidly evolving tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing J. Michael Fitzpatrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles