World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
14793
World Ranking
4729
National Ranking
2200

Calvin R. Maurer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Calvin R. Maurer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Calvin R. Maurer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Calvin R. Maurer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Calvin R. Maurer is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their academic work primarily intersects the domains of medicine and engineering, with specific focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, and biomedical engineering.

The main fields of study in Maurer's research include:

  • Medicine
  • Engineering

Their subfields of study highlight a concentration on:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

The core research topics covered in their publications relate to:

  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging

Maurer has contributed to scholarly literature, including the paper titled Fast Statistical Iterative Reconstruction for Mega-voltage Computed Tomography, published in 2020 in The Journal of Medical Investigation. This work has accumulated citations, indicating its integration into subsequent research.

Frequent collaborators in Maurer's research include:

  • Sho Ozaki
  • Akihiro Haga
  • E Chao
  • Kanabu Nawa
  • Takeshi Ohta

The notable publication venues in which Maurer has contributed emphasize the focus on medical imaging and related technologies:

  • The Journal of Medical Investigation

Best Publications

  • Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration

    J.M. Fitzpatrick;J.B. West;C.R. Maurer

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Retrospective Intermodality Brain Image Registration Techniques

    West J;Fitzpatrick Jm;Wang My;Dawant Bm

  • A linear time algorithm for computing exact Euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions

    C.R. Maurer;Rensheng Qi;V. Raghavan

  • Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains.

    Torsten Rohlfing;Robert Brandt;Randolf Menzel;Calvin R. Maurer

  • Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint

    T. Rohlfing;C.R. Maurer;D.A. Bluemke;M.A. Jacobs

  • Nonrigid image registration in shared-memory multiprocessor environments with application to brains, breasts, and bees

    T. Rohlfing;C.R. Maurer

  • Image Similarity Using Mutual Information of Regions

    Daniel B. Russakoff;Carlo Tomasi;Torsten Rohlfing;Calvin R. Maurer

  • Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality image registration techniques

    Jay B. West;J. Michael Fitzpatrick;Matthew Yang Wang;Benoit M. Dawant

  • Automatic technique for localizing externally attached fiducial markers in volume images of the head

    Matthew Y. Wang;Calvin R. Maurer;J. Michael Fitzpatrick

  • Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based nonrigid registration of gated MR images.

    Torsten Rohlfing;Calvin R. Maurer;Walter G. O'Dell;Jianhui Zhong

  • Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation

    T. Rohlfing;D.B. Russakoff;C.R. Maurer

  • Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces [image-guided surgery]

    C.R. Maurer;R.J. Maciunas;J.M. Fitzpatrick

  • Investigation of intraoperative brain deformation using a 1.5-T interventional MR system: preliminary results

    C.R. Maurer;D.L.G. Hill;A.J. Martin;Haiying Liu

  • Design and evaluation of a system for microscope-assisted guided interventions (MAGI)

    P.J. Edwards;A.P. King;C.R. Maurer;D.A. De Cunha

  • Quo Vadis, Atlas-Based Segmentation?

    Torsten Rohlfing;Robert Brandt;Randolf Menzel;Daniel B. Russakoff

  • Registration of 3-D images using weighted geometrical features

    C.R. Maurer;G.B. Aboutanos;B.M. Dawant;R.J. Maciunas

  • Measurement and analysis of brain deformation during neurosurgery

    T. Hartkens;D.L.G. Hill;A.D. Castellano-Smith;D.J. Hawkes

  • Implementation, calibration and accuracy testing of an image-enhanced endoscopy system

    R. Shahidi;M.R. Bax;C.R. Maurer;J.A. Johnson

  • Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery

    J.B. West;C.R. Maurer

  • Retrospective intermodality registration techniques for images of the head: surface-based versus volume-based

    J. West;J.M. Fitzpatrick;M.Y. Wang;B.M. Dawant

  • Design and Evaluation of a System for Microscope-Assisted Guided Interventions (MAGI)

    Philip J. Edwards;Andrew P. King;Calvin R. Maurer;Darryl A. de Cunha

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Michael Fitzpatrick
J. Michael Fitzpatrick Vanderbilt University
Derek L. G. Hill
Derek L. G. Hill Panoramic Digital Health
Benoit M. Dawant
Benoit M. Dawant Vanderbilt University
Kensaku Mori
Kensaku Mori Nagoya University
David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
David A. Bluemke
David A. Bluemke University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert M. Kessler
Robert M. Kessler University of Alabama at Birmingham
Robert L. Galloway
Robert L. Galloway Vanderbilt University
Randolf Menzel
Randolf Menzel Freie Universität Berlin
John R. Adler
John R. Adler Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degree options and career tracks. Many students pursue interdisciplinary fields to expand their career prospects, such as engineering, data science, and physics.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and sustainability, an environmental engineering degree online offers pathways into roles addressing global environmental challenges. Students keen on robotics, manufacturing or systems design may consider the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs to gain specialized skills at an accessible cost.

A solid foundation in physics can further enhance a computer science background. Opting for an online bachelor's degree in physics can lead to careers in research, engineering, or tech innovation. Moreover, the ever-growing demand for analytics has made a data science degree one of the top choices for tech-oriented professionals.

Each of these pathways offers flexible online learning and promising job opportunities, providing a strong complement to a traditional Computer Science education.

Best Scientists Citing Calvin R. Maurer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles