World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
29
Citations
2930
World Ranking
1304
National Ranking
221

David Denver publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Denver sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 197 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

David Denver D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Denver sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 29 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Denver is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on political science and international relations, sociology and political science, finance, law, and education. The subfields of their work reflect a multidisciplinary approach combining social and economic perspectives.

Denver's main research topics include social policy and reform studies, political and economic history of the UK and US, housing, finance, and neoliberalism, Irish and British studies, healthcare innovation and challenges, employment and welfare studies, and migration, refugees, and integration.

Recent publications by Denver include:

  • Committees and Witnesses in the Scottish Parliament: Beyond the 'usual suspects'? (2021), published in Scottish Affairs
  • Parliamentary committee witnesses: representation and diversity (2020), published in Journal of Legislative Studies
  • House of Commons Public Bill Committees and Oral Evidence: A Half-Step Forward? (2022), published in Parliamentary Affairs

The venues for Denver's publications are consistent with their primary academic interests, focusing on legislative studies and parliamentary affairs with contributions in journals such as the Journal of Legislative Studies, Scottish Affairs, and Parliamentary Affairs.

Denver has collaborated frequently with several researchers in related fields. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Catherine Bochel
  • Martine B. Powell
  • Guy Daly
  • Martin Powell
  • Anouk Berthier

This collaboration network supports Denver's work in social sciences and political research, broadening the scope and impact of studies undertaken.

Best Publications

  • Constituency campaigning in Britain 1992-2001: Centralization and Modernization.

    David Denver;Gordon Hands;Justin Fisher;Iain MacAllister

  • Modern Constituency Electioneering: Local Campaigning in the 1992 General Election

    David Denver;Gordon Hands

  • Canvassing, Turnout and Party Support: An Experiment

    J. M. Bochel;D. T. Denver

  • The Electoral Impact of Constituency Campaigning in Britain, 1992–2001

    David Denver;Gordon Hands;Iain MacAllister

  • Valence Politics in Scotland: Towards an Explanation of the 2007 Election

    Robert Johns;James Mitchell;David Denver;Charles Pattie

  • Marginality and Turnout in British General Elections

    Unknown

  • Scotland Decides: The Devolution Issue and the 1997 Referendum

    Hugh Bochel;David Denver;James Mitchell;Charles Pattie

  • Does Studying Politics Make a Difference? The Political Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of School Students

    David Denver;Gordon Hands

  • British elections and parties review.

    Justin Fisher;Philip Cowley;David Denver;Andrew. Russell

  • Evaluating the Electoral Effects of Traditional and Modern Modes of Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992–2005

    Justin Fisher;David Denver

  • From foot-slogging to call centres and direct mail: A framework for analysing the development of district-level campaigning

    Justin Fisher;David Denver

  • Candidate Selection in the Labour Party: What the Selectors Seek

    Unknown

  • Marginality and Turnout in General Elections in the 1970s

    David Denver;Gordon Hands

  • The impact of constituency campaigning in the 2001 general election.

    David Denver;Gordon Hands;Justin Fisher;Iain MacAllister

  • The relative electoral impact of central party co-ordination and size of party membership at constituency level

    Justin Fisher;David T. Denver;H. T. Gordon Hands

  • Elections and voting behaviour in Britain

    David Denver

  • The Results: How Britain Voted

    David T. Denver

  • Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh devolution referendums: Information, interests and opinions.

    David T. Denver

  • The Impact of the Campaign on the Results of Local Government Elections

    J. M. Bochel;D. T. Denver

  • Challengers, incumbents and the impact of constituency campaigning in Britain

    David Denver;Gordon Hands

  • RELIGION AND VOTING: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND A NEW ANALYSIS*

    J. M. Bochel;D. T. Denver

  • British Elections and Parties Review 10

    P Cowley;D Denver;Andrew Russell;L Harrison

  • ELECTIONS, PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES

    David Denver

Frequent Co-Authors

Justin Fisher
Justin Fisher Brunel University London
James K. Mitchell
James K. Mitchell Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Charles Pattie
Charles Pattie University of Sheffield
Philip Cowley
Philip Cowley Queen Mary University of London
Edward Fieldhouse
Edward Fieldhouse University of Manchester
David Cutts
David Cutts Brown University
Anthony S. Russell
Anthony S. Russell University of Alberta
David M. Farrell
David M. Farrell University College Dublin
Andrew F. Russell
Andrew F. Russell University of Exeter
Anthony King
Anthony King University of Essex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths—and online education makes these opportunities more accessible than ever. Many students explore an interdisciplinary studies course to broaden their skillset and adapt to complex roles across government, nonprofit, and business sectors.

Those keen on advancing their expertise can pursue an online masters in history. This program often complements Political Science, helping graduates excel in education, research, and analysis roles.

For faster entry into the workforce, online certificate programs that pay well are a practical option. These programs focus on specialized skills in areas like public administration, policy analysis, or digital communications.

Cost and duration also matter for many learners—consider a cheapest fastest masters degree to save on tuition and fast-track your career in fields closely related to Political Science.

Whether you’re just starting or looking to specialize, online degrees and certificates provide flexible, affordable routes to rewarding jobs in and beyond political science.

Best Scientists Citing David Denver

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles