World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
59
Citations
26058
World Ranking
2278
National Ranking
711

James K. Mitchell publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James K. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 249 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

James K. Mitchell D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James K. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1976 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering Leadership in studies of the engineering properties of soils and soil stabilization and their use in design.

Overview

James K. Mitchell is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields, including engineering and agricultural and biological sciences, with a focus on both geotechnical engineering and plant pathology.

Their primary research topics include:

  • Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
  • Plant Pathogens and Resistance

Mitchell has published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • GEOSTRATA Magazine
  • New Phytologist
  • Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication
  • Forest Pathology
  • Geo-Congress 2020

Among recent publications are:

  • "An emerging fungal disease is spreading across the globe and affecting the blueberry industry" (2025, New Phytologist)
  • "A Simplified Energy-based Liquefaction Triggering Model" (2024, Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication)
  • "Erysiphe aesculi-sylvaticae sp. nov. Infecting North American Aesculus Species: A New Cryptic Species Provides Insights Into the Invasion Dynamics of an Important Fungal Pathogen" (2025, Forest Pathology)
  • "Evaluating Liquefaction Triggering Potential at Sites Impacted by the 2016 Mw 5.8 Pawnee, Oklahoma, Induced Earthquake" (2020, Geo-Congress 2020)
  • "Evaluating the Energy and Carbon of Geotechnical Works: An Important Step in Developing Sustainable Designs" (2020, GEOSTRATA Magazine)

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably:

  • Michael Bradshaw
  • Uma Crouch
  • Russell A. Green
  • Kelly Ivors
  • Janet C. Broome

Mitchell's research delves into civil and structural engineering, plant science, cell biology, building and construction, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics. Their subfields of study include:

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Plant Science
  • Cell Biology
  • Building and Construction
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Their work also intersects diverse thematic areas in engineering and biology, integrating knowledge of soil mechanics and fungal plant disease control.

James K. Mitchell has received recognition through awards such as:

  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (1998)
  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering (1976) for leadership in studies of the engineering properties of soils and soil stabilization and their use in design

Best Publications

  • Fundamentals of soil behavior

    James Kenneth Mitchell

  • Fundamentals of Soil Behaviour

    JK Mitchell;K Soga

  • Biological Considerations in Geotechnical Engineering

    James K. Mitchell;James K. Mitchell;J. Carlos Santamarina;J. Carlos Santamarina

  • Influence of Temperature Variations on Soil Behavior

    Richard G. Campanella;James K. Mitchell

  • Effects of Sample Preparation on Sand Liquefaction

    J. Paul Mulilis;Kandiah Arulanandan;James K. Mitchell;Clarence K. Chan

  • LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE OF SOILS : SUMMARY REPORT FROM THE 1996 NCEER AND 1998 NCEER / NSF WORKSHOPS ON EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE OF SOILSa

    Unknown

  • Cavity Expansion and Penetration Resistance in Sand

    R. Salgado;J. K. Mitchell;M. Jamiolkowski

  • GENERAL STRESS-STRAIN-TIME FUNCTION FOR SOILS

    Awtar Singh;James K. Mitchell

  • Practical problems from surprising soil behavior

    James K. Mitchell

  • Assessment of Liquefaction Potential during Earthquakes by Arias Intensity

    Robert E. Kayen;James K. Mitchell

  • Permeability of Compacted Clay

    James K. Mitchell;Don R. Hooper;Richard G. Campenella

  • Analysis of Cone Resistance: Review of Methods

    H. S. Yu;J. K. Mitchell

  • Time‐Dependent Strength Gain in Freshly Deposited or Densified Sand

    James K. Mitchell;Zoltan V. Solymar

  • Kettleman Hills Waste Landfill Slope Failure. I: Liner‐System Properties

    James K. Mitchell;Raymond B. Seed;H. Bolton Seed

  • Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand

    Patricia M Gallagher;James K Mitchell

  • Conduction phenomena: from theory to geotechnical practice

    J. K. Mitchell

  • Coupled fluid, electrical and chemical flows in soil

    A. T. Yeung;J. K. Mitchell

  • Calibration Chamber Size Effects on Penetration Resistance in Sand

    R. Salgado;J. K. Mitchell;M. Jamiolkowski

  • Kettleman Hills Waste Landfill Slope Failure. II: Stability Analyses

    Raymond B. Seed;James K. Mitchell;H. Bolton Seed

  • FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF ELECTRO-OSMOSIS IN SOILS

    Donald H. Gray;James K. Mitchell

  • A Contextual Model of Natural Hazard

    James K. Mitchell;Neal Devine;Kathleen Jagger

Frequent Co-Authors

David Denver
David Denver Lancaster University
Edward Kavazanjian
Edward Kavazanjian Arizona State University
Kenichi Soga
Kenichi Soga University of California, Berkeley
Charles Pattie
Charles Pattie University of Sheffield
Michael J. Keating
Michael J. Keating The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Raymond B. Seed
Raymond B. Seed University of California, Berkeley
Nicholas Sitar
Nicholas Sitar University of California, Berkeley
Russell A. Green
Russell A. Green Virginia Tech
H. Bolton Seed
H. Bolton Seed University of California, Berkeley
Ailsa Henderson
Ailsa Henderson University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. For those interested in information management and research, programs like the ala accredited mlis programs provide valuable skills that can enhance careers in environmental data curation and library science related to Earth studies.

Wondering if a is library science a good degree question is relevant? Absolutely. This degree supports careers in academic institutions or research facilities where organizing scientific resources is crucial for Earth Science professionals.

For creative minds, combining Earth Science with technology-driven visual storytelling is increasingly popular. An online photography degree online can enhance skills in documenting environmental changes and contribute to scientific communication.

Veterans exploring new career paths may find unique opportunities through the best online photography degree programs for veterans, blending disciplined training with creative approaches that support Earth Science outreach and education.

Best Scientists Citing James K. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles