World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 186 488 450 319 289 1697 141379
Medicine 178 390 352 243 215 1354 128059

Michael J. Keating publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael J. Keating between 1960 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael J. Keating published across 66 years, from 1960 to 2025, averaging 28 papers a year. Output peaked at 105 publications in 2023. 36 of the 1,846 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 105. Peak 105 publications in 2023. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 10 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 13 publications 1982: 18 publications 1983: 15 publications 1984: 21 publications 1985: 23 publications 1986: 27 publications 1987: 28 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 17 publications 1990: 18 publications 1991: 25 publications 1992: 25 publications 1993: 31 publications 1994: 27 publications 1995: 22 publications 1996: 28 publications 1997: 30 publications 1998: 30 publications 1999: 28 publications 2000: 33 publications 2001: 44 publications 2002: 45 publications 2003: 58 publications 2004: 59 publications 2005: 72 publications 2006: 82 publications 2007: 62 publications 2008: 71 publications 2009: 76 publications 2010: 59 publications 2011: 58 publications 2012: 60 publications 2013: 66 publications 2014: 57 publications 2015: 60 publications 2016: 59 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 45 publications 2019: 38 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 105 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 18 publications
1960 2025

1,846 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael J. Keating: publications per year, 1960 to 2025
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 2
1977 3
1978 5
1979 10
1980 7
1981 13
1982 18
1983 15
1984 21
1985 23
1986 27
1987 28
1988 17
1989 17
1990 18
1991 25
1992 25
1993 31
1994 27
1995 22
1996 28
1997 30
1998 30
1999 28
2000 33
2001 44
2002 45
2003 58
2004 59
2005 72
2006 82
2007 62
2008 71
2009 76
2010 59
2011 58
2012 60
2013 66
2014 57
2015 60
2016 59
2017 54
2018 45
2019 38
2020 16
2021 33
2022 22
2023 105
2024 18
2025 18
Total 1,846
Download as CSV

Michael J. Keating publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Keating sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,341–1,360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,354 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30 1,354
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael J. Keating D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Keating sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 178–179 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 178 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19 178
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Michael J. Keating is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on genetics, pathology and forensic medicine, immunology, oncology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers key topics including chronic lymphocytic leukemia research, lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, inflammatory bowel disease, immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, microscopic colitis, advanced breast cancer therapies, and liver diseases and immunity.

Michael J. Keating has contributed to several recent publications, among which are:

  • Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax for First-line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (2021, JAMA Oncology)
  • A phase 2 study of nivolumab combined with ibrutinib in patients with diffuse large B-cell Richter transformation of CLL (2022, Blood Advances)
  • AMG-176, an Mcl-1 Antagonist, Shows Preclinical Efficacy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (2020, Clinical Cancer Research)
  • Sustained remissions in CLL after frontline FCR treatment with very-long-term follow-up (2023, Blood)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • William G. Wierda
  • Alessandra Ferrajoli
  • Nitin Jain
  • Philip A. Thompson
  • Jan A. Burger

The scientist's publications appear predominantly in journals such as:

  • Blood
  • Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  • Leukemia
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma

Best Publications

  • Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    George Adrian Calin;Calin Dan Dumitru;Masayoshi Shimizu;Roberta Bichi

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute–Working Group 1996 guidelines

    Michael Hallek;Bruce D. Cheson;Daniel Catovsky;Federico Caligaris-Cappio

  • National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

    Bruce D. Cheson;John M. Bennett;Michael Grever;Neil Kay

  • iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL

    Michael Hallek;Bruce D. Cheson;Daniel Catovsky;Federico Caligaris-Cappio

  • Use of CAR-Transduced Natural Killer Cells in CD19-Positive Lymphoid Tumors

    Enli Liu;David Marin;Pinaki Banerjee;Homer A. Macapinlac

  • Engraftment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells With Purine Analog-Containing Chemotherapy: Harnessing Graft-Versus-Leukemia Without Myeloablative Therapy

    Sergio Giralt;Elihu Estey;Maher Albitar;Koen Van Besien

  • Transplant-lite: induction of graft-versus-malignancy using fludarabine-based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic blood progenitor-cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies.

    I F Khouri;M Keating;M Körbling;D Przepiorka

  • Early Results of a Chemoimmunotherapy Regimen of Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab As Initial Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Michael J. Keating;Susan O'Brien;Maher Albitar;Susan Lerner

  • CD28 costimulation improves expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells in lymphoma patients

    Barbara Savoldo;Carlos Almeida Ramos;Carlos Almeida Ramos;Enli Liu;Martha P. Mims

  • Therapeutic role of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in patients who have failed fludarabine: results of a large international study.

    Michael J. Keating;Ian Flinn;Vinay Jain;Jacques-Louis Binet

  • Superoxide dismutase as a target for the selective killing of cancer cells

    Peng Huang;Li Feng;Elizabeth A. Oldham;Michael J. Keating

  • ZAP-70 Compared with Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Mutation Status as a Predictor of Disease Progression in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Laura Z. Rassenti;Lang Huynh;Tracy L. Toy;Liguang Chen

  • Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: a novel strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and hypoxia.

    Rui Hua Xu;Helene Pelicano;Yan Zhou;Jennifer S. Carew

  • Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia.

    B D Cheson;P A Cassileth;D R Head;C A Schiffer

  • Angiogenesis in acute and chronic leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes

    Alvaro Aguayo;Hagop M Kantarjian;Taghi Manshouri;Cristi Gidel

  • Hematologic Remission and Cytogenetic Improvement Induced by Recombinant Human Interferon AlphaA in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

    Moshe Talpaz;Hagop M. Kantarjian;Kenneth McCredie;Jose M. Trujillo

  • Results of Treatment With Hyper-CVAD, a Dose-Intensive Regimen, in Adult Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Hagop M Kantarjian;Susan O'Brien;Terry L. Smith;Jorge E Cortes

  • Long-term results of the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab regimen as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

    Constantine S. Tam;Susan O'Brien;William Wierda;Hagop Kantarjian

  • Long-term follow-up results of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (Hyper-CVAD), a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia

    Hagop Kantarjian;Deborah Thomas;Susan O'Brien;Jorge Cortes

  • Rituximab Dose-Escalation Trial in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Susan M. O’Brien;Hagop Kantarjian;Deborah A. Thomas;Francis J. Giles

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan O'Brien
Susan O'Brien University of California, Irvine
William G. Wierda
William G. Wierda The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Hagop M. Kantarjian
Hagop M. Kantarjian The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Alessandra Ferrajoli
Alessandra Ferrajoli The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jan A. Burger
Jan A. Burger The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Zeev Estrov
Zeev Estrov The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Stefan Faderl
Stefan Faderl The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jorge E. Cortes
Jorge E. Cortes Augusta University
Elihu H. Estey
Elihu H. Estey University of Washington
Nitin Jain
Nitin Jain The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The healthcare field offers numerous online educational options for those seeking flexible study paths and diverse career opportunities. One popular choice is the RN to BSN pathway, which helps registered nurses advance their careers with a bachelor’s degree. Prospective students often look for the average cost of rn to bsn programs to understand the investment required and to find affordable options.

For individuals without a nursing background, there are also entry level msn programs online that provide a direct route to advanced nursing roles. These fast-tracked programs can be ideal for career changers who want to enter nursing at the graduate level.

Those looking for more accessible program options may be interested in the easy nursing programs to get into, which can help students enter the medical field with fewer barriers to admission.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. Some prefer the administrative side, such as medical billing and coding. There are online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making these courses more financially accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Keating

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles