World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6905 6436 328 322 193 9235
Neuroscience 44 7104 6541 596 565 198 9235

Walter Huber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Walter Huber between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Walter Huber published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2013. 10 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2013. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 1 publication
1974 2025

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Walter Huber: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 5
1976 0
1977 4
1978 0
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 6
1992 4
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 3
2000 6
2001 7
2002 4
2003 5
2004 6
2005 8
2006 11
2007 5
2008 14
2009 13
2010 17
2011 16
2012 14
2013 21
2014 11
2015 5
2016 3
2017 3
2018 5
2019 0
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 0
2024 9
2025 1
Total 238
Download as CSV

Walter Huber publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Huber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 193 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 193
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Walter Huber D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter Huber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Walter Huber is affiliated with RWTH Aachen University in Germany, with a research focus spanning neuroscience and medicine. Their work primarily addresses cognitive neuroscience and rehabilitation, with additional contributions in epidemiology, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Huber's research topics encompass the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, acute ischemic stroke management, action observation and synchronization, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, reading and literacy development, and linguistic research and analysis.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Huber include Klaus Willmes, Ferdinand Binkofski, Agnes Flöel, Dorothea Peitz, and Katja Hußmann.

Huber's publications have appeared in venues such as Cortex, Journal of Neurology, Neurologie & Rehabilitation, and the European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

Recent papers include:

  • The prevalence of apraxia of speech in chronic aphasia after stroke: A bayesian hierarchical analysis (2022, Cortex)
  • Success rates of intensive aphasia therapy: real-world data from 448 patients between 2003 and 2020 (2024, Journal of Neurology)
  • 5-year course of therapy-induced recovery in chronic non-fluent aphasia - Three single cases (2020, Cortex)
  • Abstractband zur 20. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Aphasieforschung und -behandlung (GAB) (2021, Neurologie & Rehabilitation)
  • Correction to: Success rates of intensive aphasia therapy: real-world data from 448 patients between 2003 and 2020 (2024, Journal of Neurology)

Best Publications

  • Ventral and dorsal pathways for language

    Dorothee Saur;Björn W. Kreher;Susanne Schnell;Dorothee Kümmerer

  • Recovery from Wernicke's aphasia: a positron emission tomographic study.

    Cornelius Weiller;Christian Isensee;Michel Rijntjes;Walter Huber

  • Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting

    Caterina Breitenstein;Tanja Grewe;Agnes Flöel;Wolfram Ziegler

  • Motor cortex hand area and speech: implications for the development of language.

    Ingo Gerrit Meister;Babak Boroojerdi;Henrik Foltys;Roland Sparing

  • Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in school-aged children after neonatal arterial switch operation

    Hedwig H. Hövels-Gürich;Marie-Christine Seghaye;Ralph Schnitker;Magdalene Wiesner

  • The functional anatomy of recovery from auditory agnosia - A PET study of sound categorization in a neurological patient and normal controls

    A. Engelien;D. Silbersweig;E. Stern;W. Huber

  • Cognitive subtypes of dyslexia.

    Stefan Heim;Julia Tschierse;Katrin Amunts;Marcus Wilms

  • Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's area

    R. Töpper;F. M. Mottaghy;M. Brügmann;J. Noth

  • Facilitation of picture naming after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    F.M. Mottaghy;M. Hungs;M. Brügmann;R. Sparing

  • Outcome of intensive language treatment in aphasia.

    Klaus Poeck;Walter Huber;Klaus Willmes

  • Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension.

    Carin Whitney;Walter Huber;Juliane Klann;Susanne Weis

  • The subcortical role of language processing. High level linguistic features such as ambiguity-resolution and the human brain; an fMRI study.

    Daniel Ketteler;Frank Kastrau;Rene Vohn;Walter Huber

  • Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations.

    Olga Sachs;Susanne Weis;Timo Krings;Walter Huber

  • Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study

    Walter Huber;Klaus Willmes;Klaus Poeck;Betty Van Vleymen

  • Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia

    Walter Huber;Jochen Gleber

  • Therapy-induced brain reorganization patterns in aphasia

    Stefanie Abel;Cornelius Weiller;Walter Huber;Klaus Willmes

  • Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories.

    Olga Sachs;Susanne Weis;Nadia Zellagui;Walter Huber

  • Long-term outcome of speech and language in children after corrective surgery for cyanotic or acyanotic cardiac defects in infancy.

    Hedwig H. Hövels-Gürich;Sebastian B. Bauer;Ralph Schnitker;Klaus Willmes-von Hinckeldey

  • Text comprehension in aphasia.

    F.-J. Stachowiak;W. Huber;K. Poeck;M. Kerschensteiner

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on language function depend on the stimulation parameters.

    Roland Sparing;Felix M. Mottaghy;Marcel Hungs;Marc Brügmann

  • Recovery From Aphasia After Hemicraniectomy for Infarction of the Speech-Dominant Hemisphere

    Frank Kastrau;Marcus Wolter;Walter Huber;Frank Block

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus Willmes
Klaus Willmes RWTH Aachen University
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Susanne Weis
Susanne Weis Forschungszentrum Jülich
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Cornelius Weiller
Cornelius Weiller University of Freiburg
Ralph Radach
Ralph Radach University of Wuppertal
Yosef Grodzinsky
Yosef Grodzinsky Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Roland Zahn
Roland Zahn King's College London
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Ferdinand Binkofski
Ferdinand Binkofski RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and neuroscience-related fields is a practical way to launch or advance your career. Many students pursue psyd psychology online programs, which focus on clinical practice and prepare graduates for licensure as psychologists.

For those interested in counseling, mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) provide flexible options to quickly enter this rewarding profession. In addition, accelerated degree programs let students finish their bachelor's degrees faster, saving both money and time.

When choosing a pathway, it’s wise to consider future earnings. Some of the highest paying degrees are in health and neuroscience-related disciplines. Online programs make it easier than ever to pursue advanced study and move toward high-growth career fields, all while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Walter Huber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles