World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
85
Citations
27403
World Ranking
216
National Ranking
157

Agnes R. Quisumbing publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnes R. Quisumbing sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 355 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Agnes R. Quisumbing D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Agnes R. Quisumbing sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Agnes R. Quisumbing is affiliated with the International Food Policy Research Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the social sciences, with specific attention to nutrition and dietetics, safety research, general health professions, economics and econometrics, and gender studies.

The scientist addresses several main topics, including child nutrition and water access, poverty, education, child welfare, food security and health in diverse populations, microfinance and financial inclusion, gender, labor, and family dynamics, agricultural innovations and practices, and rural development and sustainability.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Global Food Security
  • Food Policy
  • Social Science & Medicine

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Agnes R. Quisumbing are:

  • A review of evidence on gender equality, women's empowerment, and food systems (2022), Global Food Security
  • Do tradeoffs among dimensions of women's empowerment and nutrition outcomes exist? Evidence from six countries in Africa and Asia (2020), Food Policy
  • Measuring Women's Empowerment in Agriculture: Innovations and evidence (2023), Global Food Security
  • Measuring Time Use in Developing Country Agriculture: Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda (2020), Feminist Economics
  • Bargaining power, decision making, and biofortification: The role of gender in adoption of orange sweet potato in Uganda (2020), Food Policy

Agnes R. Quisumbing collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Hazel Malapit
  • Ruth Meinzen-Dick
  • Greg Seymour
  • Jessica Heckert
  • Cheryl R. Doss

Best Publications

  • The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index

    Sabina Alkire;Ruth Meinzen-Dick;Amber Peterman;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Resources at Marriage and Intrahousehold Allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa*

    Agnes R. Quisumbing;John A. Maluccio

  • The impact of improving nutrition during early childhood on education among Guatemalan adults.

    John A. Maluccio;John Hoddinott;Jere R. Behrman;Reynaldo Martorell

  • Gender, property rights, and natural resources

    Ruth Suseela Meinzen-Dick;Lynn R. Brown;Hilary Sims Feldstein;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Promising Approaches to Address the Needs of Poor Female Farmers: Resources, Constraints, and Interventions

    Agnes R. Quisumbing;Lauren Pandolfelli

  • Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture: What Role for Food Security in Bangladesh?

    Esha Sraboni;Hazel J. Malapit;Agnes R. Quisumbing;Akhter U. Ahmed

  • Male-female differences in agricultural productivity: Methodological issues and empirical evidence

    Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Adult consequences of growth failure in early childhood

    John Hoddinott;Jere R Behrman;John A Maluccio;Paul Melgar

  • Household decisions, gender, and development: a synthesis of recent research.

    Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • INTRAHOUSEHOLD ALLOCATION AND GENDER RELATIONS: NEW EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM FOUR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

    Agnes R. Quisumbing;John A. Maluccio

  • Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: What have we learned so far?

    Marie T. Ruel;Agnes R. Quisumbing;Mysbah Balagamwala

  • The gender implications of large-scale land deals

    Julia A. Behrman;Ruth Suseela Meinzen-Dick;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • What dimensions of women’s empowerment in agriculture matter for nutrition in Ghana?

    Hazel Jean L. Malapit;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • A Review of Empirical Evidence on Gender Differences in Nonland Agricultural Inputs, Technology, and Services in Developing Countries

    Amber Peterman;Julia Andrea Behrman;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Women’s Empowerment Mitigates the Negative Effects of Low Production Diversity on Maternal and Child Nutrition in Nepal

    Hazel Jean L. Malapit;Suneetha Kadiyala;Agnes R. Quisumbing;Kenda Cunningham

  • Gender inequalities in ownership and control of land in Africa: myth and reality

    Cheryl Doss;Chiara Kovarik;Amber Peterman;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Understanding the complexities surrounding gender differences in agricultural productivity in Nigeria and Uganda

    Amber Peterman;Agnes Quisumbing;Julia Andrea Behrman;Ephraim Nkonya

  • Women: the key to food security.

    A. R. Quisumbing;L. R. Brown;H. S. Feldstein;L. Haddad

  • Women in agriculture: Four myths

    Cheryl Doss;Cheryl Doss;Ruth Meinzen-Dick;Agnes Quisumbing;Sophie Theis

  • Human Capital, Productivity, and Labor Allocation in Rural Pakistan

    Marcel Fafchamps;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Gender and Sustainability

    Ruth Meinzen-Dick;Chiara Kovarik;Agnes R. Quisumbing

  • Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers

    Agnes Quisumbing;Lauren Pandolfelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth Meinzen-Dick
Ruth Meinzen-Dick International Food Policy Research Institute
Cheryl R. Doss
Cheryl R. Doss Tufts University
Keijiro Otsuka
Keijiro Otsuka Kobe University
Marcel Fafchamps
Marcel Fafchamps Stanford University
John Hoddinott
John Hoddinott Cornell University
Amber Peterman
Amber Peterman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lawrence Haddad
Lawrence Haddad Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition
Jere R. Behrman
Jere R. Behrman University of Pennsylvania
John A. Maluccio
John A. Maluccio Middlebury College
Kathryn M. Yount
Kathryn M. Yount Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Economics and Finance can open up a variety of career options. Many students consider whether is project management a good degree for expanding opportunities in business or finance sectors. Project management skills are highly valued and often complement an Economics or Finance background.

For those interested in the financial sector, pursuing a bachelor's degree in finance online is a flexible way to build foundational knowledge and practical skills. Students aiming for more advanced roles might consider one of the best accelerated mba programs to fast-track their qualifications and leadership potential.

Meanwhile, for those looking to quickly enter the workforce or boost their current credentials, completing one of the best bookkeeping certification online programs can be a fast and affordable option. No matter your goals, online programs now provide numerous pathways to launch or elevate your career in Economics, Finance, or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Agnes R. Quisumbing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles