World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
63
Citations
12541
World Ranking
2513
National Ranking
42

Nicholas Jarvis publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Jarvis sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 219 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Nicholas Jarvis D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Jarvis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas Jarvis is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their research spans key areas within environmental science, engineering, and agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular focus on soil and water-related processes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these broad categories, Jarvis has contributed significantly to subfields such as:

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Soil Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Ecology

Their work covers several main research topics, including:

  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Jarvis has published multiple papers, among them notable recent works that illustrate their research interests:

  • A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality (2020, European Journal of Soil Science)
  • A framework for modelling soil structure dynamics induced by biological activity (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Scale and REV analyses for porosity and pore connectivity measures in undisturbed soil (2020, Geoderma)
  • Relations between soil organic carbon content and the pore size distribution for an arable topsoil with large variations in soil properties (2022, European Journal of Soil Science)
  • Modelling dynamic interactions between soil structure and the storage and turnover of soil organic matter (2020, Biogeosciences)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Mats Larsbo
  • John Koestel
  • Elsa Coucheney
  • Katharina Meurer
  • Tobias Klöffel

Publication venues where Jarvis has appeared most frequently are:

  • European Journal of Soil Science
  • Geoderma
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • SOIL
  • Soil and Tillage Research

Best Publications

  • A review of non‐equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality

    Unknown

  • Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone

    Jirka Šimůnek;Nick J. Jarvis;M.Th. van Genuchten;Annemieke Gärdenäs

  • Temporal variation in the hydraulic conductivity of a tilled clay soil as measured by tension infiltrometers

    I. Messing;N. J. Jarvis

  • Modelling water and solute transport in macroporous soil. I. Model description and sensitivity analysis

    N.J. Jarvis;P.E. Jansson;P.E. Dik;I. Messing

  • A simple empirical model of root water uptake

    Unknown

  • Influence of soil, land use and climatic factors on the hydraulic conductivity of soil

    N. Jarvis;J. Koestel;I. Messing;J. Moeys

  • Near-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Soils of Contrasting Texture Measured by Tension Infiltrometers

    N. J. Jarvis;I. Messing

  • Understanding Preferential Flow in the Vadose Zone: Recent Advances and Future Prospects

    Nicholas Jarvis;John Koestel;Mats Larsbo

  • An Improved Dual-Permeability Model of Water Flow and Solute Transport in the Vadose Zone

    Mats Larsbo;Stephanie Roulier;Fredrik Stenemo;Roy Kasteel

  • Evaluation of a dual-porosity model to predict field-scale solute transport in a macroporous soil

    Unknown

  • A review of non‐equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality

    Unknown

  • Indirect estimation of near-saturated hydraulic conductivity from readily available soil information

    N.J. Jarvis;L. Zavattaro;K. Rajkai;W.D. Reynolds

  • Relations between macropore network characteristics and the degree of preferential solute transport

    M. Larsbo;J. Koestel;N. Jarvis

  • Connectivity and percolation of structural pore networks in a cultivated silt loam soil quantified by X-ray tomography

    Nicholas Jarvis;Mats Larsbo;John Koestel

  • Modelling particle mobilization and leaching in macroporous soil

    N. J. Jarvis;K. G. Villholth;B. Ulén

  • Simple physics-based models of compensatory plant water uptake: concepts and eco-hydrological consequences

    N. J. Jarvis

  • Relations between soil organic carbon content and the pore size distribution for an arable topsoil with large variations in soil properties

    Unknown

  • Field Investigations and Modeling of Particle‐Facilitated Pesticide Transport in Macroporous Soil

    Karen G. Villholth;Nicholas J. Jarvis;Ole H. Jacobsen;Hubert de Jonge

  • Long-term effects of sewage sludge applications on soil properties, cadmium availability and distribution in arable soil

    Petra Bergkvist;Nicholas Jarvis;Dan Berggren;Käll Carlgren

  • A framework for modelling soil structure dynamics induced by biological activity

    Katharina Meurer;Jennie Barron;Claire Chenu;Elsa Coucheney

  • Two-dimensional modelling of preferential water flow and pesticide transport from a tile-drained field

    Annemieke I. Gärdenäs;Jirka Šimůnek;Nicholas Jarvis;M.Th. van Genuchten

  • Water repellency, near-saturated infiltration and preferential solute transport in a macroporous clay soil

    N. Jarvis;A. Etana;F. Stagnitti

  • Modelling water and solute transport in macroporous soil. II. Chloride breakthrough under non‐steady flow

    N. J. Jarvis;L. Bergström;P. E. Dik

  • Persistent subsoil compaction and its effects on preferential flow patterns in a loamy till soil

    A. Etana;M. Larsbo;T. Keller;J. Arvidsson

  • Seasonal variation in field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in two swelling clay soils in Sweden

    I. Messing;N. J. Jarvis

  • Herbicide sorption, degradation, and leaching in three Swedish soils under long-term conventional and reduced tillage

    Mats Larsbo;John Stenström;Ararso Etana;Elisabet Börjesson

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Trevisan
Marco Trevisan Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Thomas Keller
Thomas Keller Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Hayley J. Fowler
Hayley J. Fowler Newcastle University
Lars Bergström
Lars Bergström Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Colin D. Brown
Colin D. Brown University of York
Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen
Hans-Jørgen Albrechtsen Technical University of Denmark
Thomas Kätterer
Thomas Kätterer Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Harry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken Forschungszentrum Jülich
Binayak P. Mohanty
Binayak P. Mohanty Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Environmental Sciences can broaden your career opportunities and offer flexible learning options. For those interested in education leadership, there are top programs featuring eds to edd programs that prepare graduates for academic and administrative roles.

Social work intersects with environmental justice, and pursuing dsw programs online allows professionals to advance in mental health, community advocacy, and policy roles focused on sustainable development.

If you’re seeking more budget-friendly options, numerous affordable options include budget friendly online general studies degree programs that provide a versatile education foundation applicable to environmental fields.

For those early in their academic journey or balancing other commitments, considering some of the easiest bachelor's degree to get may help complete degree requirements efficiently while gaining relevant skills applicable to environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Jarvis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles