World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8692
World Ranking
5771
National Ranking
385

Erwin Klumpp publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erwin Klumpp sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Erwin Klumpp D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erwin Klumpp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management

    Violette Geissen;Hans Mol;Erwin Klumpp;Günter Umlauf

  • Microaggregates in soils

    Kai Uwe Totsche;Wulf Amelung;Martin H. Gerzabek;Georg Guggenberger

  • The role of reactive surface sites and complexation by humic acids in the interaction of clay mineral and iron oxide particles

    Etelka Tombácz;Zsuzsanna Libor;Erzsébet Illés;Andrea Majzik

  • Sensitivity of the transport and retention of stabilized silver nanoparticles to physicochemical factors

    Yan Liang;Scott A. Bradford;Jiri Simunek;Harry Vereecken

  • Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities

    T. S. George;C. D. Giles;D. Menezes-Blackburn;Leo M. Condron

  • Transport and retention of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in saturated porous media: effects of input concentration and grain size.

    Daniela Kasel;Scott A. Bradford;Jiří Šimůnek;Marc Heggen;Marc Heggen

  • Dissolved and colloidal phosphorus fluxes in forest ecosystems-an almost blind spot in ecosystem research

    Roland Bol;Dorit Julich;Dominik Brödlin;Jan Siemens

  • Retention and remobilization of stabilized silver nanoparticles in an undisturbed loamy sand soil.

    Yan Liang;Scott A. Bradford;Jiri Simunek;Marc Heggen

  • Bacteria transport and deposition under unsaturated conditions: the role of the matrix grain size and the bacteria surface protein.

    G. Gargiulo;S. Bradford;J. Šimůnek;P. Ustohal

  • Challenges of Reducing Phosphorus Based Water Eutrophication in the Agricultural Landscapes of Northwest Europe

    Roland Bol;Gerard Gruau;Per-Erik Mellander;Remi Dupas

  • Bacteria Transport and Deposition under Unsaturated Flow Conditions: The Role of Water Content and Bacteria Surface Hydrophobicity

    G. Gargiulo;S. A. Bradford;J. Simunek;P. Ustohal

  • Light-expanded clay aggregate (LECA) as a substrate in constructed wetlands – A review

    Rawan Mlih;Franciszek Bydalek;Franciszek Bydalek;Erwin Klumpp;Nader Yaghi

  • Effect of pH and ionic strength on the interaction of humic acid with aluminium oxide

    E. Tombácz;Á. Dobos;M. Szekeres;H. D. Narres

  • Speciation and distribution of P associated with Fe and Al oxides in aggregate-sized fraction of an arable soil

    X. Jiang;R. Bol;S. Willbold;H. Vereecken

  • Leaching of natural colloids from forest topsoils and their relevance for phosphorus mobility.

    Anna Missong;Anna Missong;Stefan Holzmann;Roland Bol;Volker Nischwitz

  • Physicochemical interactions between atrazine and clay minerals

    Unknown

  • Isomer-specific degradation of branched and linear 4-nonylphenol isomers in an oxic soil.

    Jun Shan;Bingqi Jiang;Bin Yu;Chengliang Li

  • Sorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol on modified hydrotalcites

    Unknown

  • Colloidal iron and organic carbon control soil aggregate formation and stability in arable Luvisols

    Lars Krause;Lars Krause;Erwin Klumpp;Ines Nofz;Anna Missong

  • Phosphorus Containing Water Dispersible Nanoparticles in Arable Soil.

    Xiaoqian Jiang;Roland Bol;Volker Nischwitz;Nina Siebers

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken Forschungszentrum Jülich
Roland Bol
Roland Bol Forschungszentrum Jülich
Wulf Amelung
Wulf Amelung University of Bonn
Scott A. Bradford
Scott A. Bradford Agricultural Research Service
Jan Siemens
Jan Siemens University of Giessen
Andreas Schäffer
Andreas Schäffer RWTH Aachen University
Jirka Šimůnek
Jirka Šimůnek University of California, Riverside
Rong Ji
Rong Ji Nanjing University
Klaus Kaiser
Klaus Kaiser Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Marc Heggen
Marc Heggen Forschungszentrum Jülich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences often leads students to consider diverse fields that complement or expand their expertise. For those interested in broader social impacts and community work, online dsw programs in social work offer advanced study options focused on societal well-being and sustainability initiatives.

Students seeking flexible and budget-friendly education may find value in a budget friendly online general studies degree, which allows exploration of multiple disciplines related to environmental issues while keeping costs manageable.

For those concerned about balancing academic rigor with timely completion, identifying the easiest degree to get can help tailor a study plan without sacrificing foundational knowledge, especially when entering fields adjacent to environmental sciences.

Finally, specializing directly in Earth-related sciences is possible through a geoscience online degree. This path equips students with critical skills to analyze geological processes essential for environmental conservation and resource management careers.

Best Scientists Citing Erwin Klumpp

Recently Published Articles