World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3538 3260 1993 1795 129 13597
Neuroscience 61 3677 3361 1686 1519 136 13651

Kathleen Y. Haaland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathleen Y. Haaland between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathleen Y. Haaland published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2009. 1 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2009. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathleen Y. Haaland: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 3
1981 2
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 4
1988 0
1989 4
1990 5
1991 4
1992 3
1993 1
1994 3
1995 5
1996 3
1997 7
1998 5
1999 2
2000 5
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 5
2005 4
2006 4
2007 5
2008 3
2009 8
2010 5
2011 8
2012 5
2013 5
2014 5
2015 3
2016 3
2017 3
2018 1
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 143
Download as CSV

Kathleen Y. Haaland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen Y. Haaland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 129
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathleen Y. Haaland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen Y. Haaland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Kathleen Y. Haaland is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on several subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, Economics and Econometrics, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's recent papers include research on everyday functioning and attention mechanisms. Notable publications are:

  • Influence of age and education on a performance-based measure of everyday functioning, 2020, Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • Periodic neglect after frontoparietal lesions provides causal evidence for rhythmic attention sampling, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Coauthors who have frequently collaborated with Haaland include:

  • Danielle C. Hergert
  • Dalin T. Pulsipher
  • Joseph Sadek
  • Isabel María Raposo
  • Sara M. Szczepanski

Publication venues where this researcher's work appears most often are:

  • Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Main topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Kathleen Y. Haaland received the Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) award in 1992.

Best Publications

  • Distributed Neural Systems Underlying the Timing of Movements

    Stephen M. Rao;Deborah L. Harrington;Kathleen Y. Haaland;Julie A. Bobholz

  • CORTICAL NETWORKS UNDERLYING MECHANISMS OF TIME PERCEPTION

    Deborah L. Harrington;Kathleen Y. Haaland;Robert T. Knight

  • Neural representations of skilled movement.

    Kathleen Y. Haaland;Deborah L. Harrington;Robert T. Knight

  • Temporal processing in the basal ganglia

    Harrington Dl;Haaland Ky;Hermanowicz N

  • Nutritional status and cognitive functioning in a normally aging sample: a 6-y reassessment.

    A La Rue;K M Koehler;S J Wayne;S J Chiulli

  • West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease.

    Larry E. Davis;Roberta DeBiasi;Diane E. Goade;Kathleen Y. Haaland

  • Decreased white matter integrity in late-myelinating fiber pathways in Alzheimer's disease supports retrogenesis.

    Nikki H. Stricker;B. C. Schweinsburg;Lisa Delano-Wood;Lisa Delano-Wood;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga

  • Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control

    Sydney Y. Schaefer;Kathleen Y. Haaland;Robert L. Sainburg

  • Clinical significance of MRI white matter lesions in the elderly.

    A. L. Hunt;W. W. Orrison;R. A. Yeo;K. Y. Haaland

  • Motor Sequence Complexity and Performing Hand Produce Differential Patterns of Hemispheric Lateralization

    Kathleen Y. Haaland;Catherine L. Elsinger;Andrew R. Mayer;Sally Durgerian

  • Procedural memory in Parkinson's disease: Impaired motor but not visuoperceptual learning.

    Deborah L. Harrington;Kathleen York Haaland;Ronald A. Yeo;Ellen Marder

  • Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching

    Kathleen Y. Haaland;Jillian L. Prestopnik;Robert T. Knight;Roland R. Lee

  • Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy

    Sydney Y. Schaefer;Kathleen Y. Haaland;Robert L. Sainburg

  • Hemispheric asymmetry of movement

    Kathleen Y Haaland;Deborah L Harrington

  • Neural underpinnings of temporal processing: a review of focal lesion, pharmacological, and functional imaging research.

    Deborah L. Harrington;Kathleen Y. Haaland

  • Sequencing in Parkinson's disease. Abnormalities in programming and controlling movement.

    Deborah L. Harrington;Deborah L. Harrington;Kathleen York Haaland;Kathleen York Haaland

  • Methylmercury poisoning: Long-term clinical, radiological, toxicological, and pathological studies of an affected family

    Larry E. Davis;Mario Kornfeld;Herbert S. Mooney;Kurt J. Fiedler

  • Hemispheric control of the initial and corrective components of aiming movements.

    Kathleen York Haaland;Deborah L. Harrington

  • The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation.

    Pratik K. Mutha;Kathleen Y. Haaland;Robert L. Sainburg

  • Specialized Neural Systems Underlying Representations of Sequential Movements

    Deborah L. Harrington;Stephen M. Rao;Kathleen Y. Haaland;Julie A. Bobholz

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah L. Harrington
Deborah L. Harrington Veterans Health Administration
Robert L. Sainburg
Robert L. Sainburg Pennsylvania State University
Ronald A. Yeo
Ronald A. Yeo University of New Mexico
Stephen M. Rao
Stephen M. Rao Cleveland Clinic
Andrew R. Mayer
Andrew R. Mayer Mind Research Network
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Jeffrey R. Binder
Jeffrey R. Binder Medical College of Wisconsin
Robert W. Cox
Robert W. Cox National Institutes of Health
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online learning opportunities and diverse career paths. Many students find related programs, such as social work, offer a strong foundation for impactful careers helping individuals and communities.

With flexible online social work degrees available across the country, you can choose the learning environment that fits your lifestyle. The most valuable online social work degrees in Maryland highlight options for students interested in social justice and advocacy roles.

For those in other regions, the most valuable online social work degree programs in the Midwest offer a wide range of specializations, while students in the West can consider the most valuable online social work degrees in Nevada for region-specific opportunities.

Affordability also matters — the best value online social work degrees in Ohio offer excellent programs at competitive tuition rates.

Exploring these programs can help psychology students find pathways tailored to their interests and career goals, all while benefiting from the flexibility and reach of online education.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen Y. Haaland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles