World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel L. Nickrent

Daniel L. Nickrent

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
47
Citations
18870
World Ranking
2466
National Ranking
613

Daniel L. Nickrent publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Nickrent sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 138 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Daniel L. Nickrent D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Nickrent sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants

    Mark Van Kleunen;Wayne Dawson;Franz Essl;Jan Pergl

  • An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants

    Kåre Bremer;Mark W. Chase;Peter F. Stevens;Arne A. Anderberg

  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences

    Douglas E. Soltis;Pamela S. Soltis;Daniel L. Nickrent;Leigh A. Johnson

  • Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion

    Petr Pyšek;Jan Pergl;Franz Essl;Bernd Lenzner

  • Mistletoes: Pathology, Systematics, Ecology, and Management

    Robert L. Mathiasen;Daniel L. Nickrent;David C. Shaw;David M. Watson

  • A revised classification of Santalales

    Daniel L. Nickrent;Valéry Malécot;Romina Vidal-Russell;Joshua P. Der

  • Multigene Phylogeny of Land Plants with Special Reference to Bryophytes and the Earliest Land Plants

    Daniel L. Nickrent;Christopher L. Parkinson;Jeffrey D. Palmer;R. Joel Duff

  • Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny.

    K S Renzaglia;Duff Rjt;D L Nickrent;D J Garbary

  • The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database

    Mark van Kleunen;Petr Pyšek;Wayne Dawson;Franz Essl

  • Parasitic angiosperms: How often and how many?

    Daniel L. Nickrent

  • Possible Loss of the Chloroplast Genome in the Parasitic Flowering Plant Rafflesia lagascae (Rafflesiaceae)

    Jeanmaire Molina;Khaled M. Hazzouri;Daniel Nickrent;Matthew Geisler

  • Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolutionary Studies of Parasitic Plants

    Daniel L. Nickrent;R. Joel Duff;Alison E. Colwell;Andrea D. Wolfe

  • Global models and predictions of plant diversity based on advanced machine learning techniques.

    Unknown

  • The recovery of an endangered plant. I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora

    Bruce M. Pavlik;Daniel L. Nickrent;Ann M. Howald

  • Phylogenetic relationships of land plants using mitochondrial small-subunit rDNA sequences.

    R. Joel Duff;Daniel L. Nickrent

  • Competitive relationships of Andropogon gerardii (Big Bluestem) from remnant and restored native populations and select cultivated varieties

    D. J. Gustafson;D. J. Gibson;D. L. Nickrent

  • Floral Gigantism in Rafflesiaceae

    Charles C. Davis;Maribeth Latvis;Daniel L. Nickrent;Kenneth J. Wurdack

  • Evolutionary relationships in the showy mistletoe family (Loranthaceae).

    Romina Vidal-Russell;Daniel L. Nickrent

  • Phylogenetic inference in Rafflesiales: the influence of rate heterogeneity and horizontal gene transfer

    Daniel L. Nickrent;Albert Blarer;Yin Long Qiu;Romina Vidal-Russell

  • A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF ARCEUTHOBIUM (VISCACEAE) BASED ON NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA INTERNAL TRANSCRIBED SPACER SEQUENCES

    Daniel L. Nickrent;Kevin P. Schuette;Ellen M. Starr

  • High rates of nucleotide substitution in nuclear small-subunit (18S) rDNA from holoparasitic flowering plants

    D. L. Nickrent;E. M. Starr

  • The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal?

    P S Soltis;D E Soltis;P G Wolf;D L Nickrent

  • The first mistletoes: Origins of aerial parasitism in Santalales

    Romina Vidal-Russell;Daniel L. Nickrent

  • Developmental failure and loss of reproductive capacity in the rare palaeoendemic shrub Dedeckera eurekensis

    Delbert Wiens;Daniel L. Nickrent;Cedric I. Davern;Clyde L. Calvin

  • Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach@@@Photo Gallery of Vascular Plants

    Rudolf Schmid;Walter S. Judd;Christopher S. Campbell;Elizabeth A. Kellogg

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Gibson
David J. Gibson Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Douglas E. Soltis
Douglas E. Soltis University of Florida
Jan Pergl
Jan Pergl Czech Academy of Sciences
Holger Kreft
Holger Kreft University of Göttingen
Patrick Weigelt
Patrick Weigelt University of Göttingen
Inderjit
Inderjit University of Delhi
Wen-Sheng Shu
Wen-Sheng Shu South China Normal University
Pamela S. Soltis
Pamela S. Soltis University of Florida
Hanno Seebens
Hanno Seebens Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Nickrent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles