World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7043
World Ranking
7647
National Ranking
60

A. K. M. Najmul Islam publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. K. M. Najmul Islam sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 108 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

A. K. M. Najmul Islam D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. K. M. Najmul Islam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

A. K. M. Najmul Islam is affiliated with Lappeenranta University of Technology in Finland. Their research primarily lies within the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with significant contributions across various subfields including Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Management, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist has focused on several core topics, notably Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, Digital Marketing and Social Media, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, as well as Ethics and Social Impacts of AI.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Prabhat Kumar, Samuli Laato, Randhir Kumar, Muhammad Nazrul Islam, and Alireza Jolfaei. These co-authors have contributed together on multiple occasions, highlighting ongoing research partnerships.

Publications by A. K. M. Najmul Islam have appeared in notable venues such as IEEE Access, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Internet Research, Decision Support Systems, and arXiv (Cornell University). The scientist has published extensively, with a particular concentration in IEEE Access and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective" (2020), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach" (2020), published in Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
  • "Impact of Online Information on Self-Isolation Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study" (2020), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion" (2021), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda" (2020), published in Computers in Industry

The research topics tackled by A. K. M. Najmul Islam frequently intersect technology with social and behavioral sciences, addressing issues such as misinformation, algorithmic biases, self-isolation behavior during pandemics, and blockchain applications in healthcare.

Best Publications

  • Unusual purchasing behavior during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: The stimulus-organism-response approach

    Samuli Laato;A.K.M. Najmul Islam;A.K.M. Najmul Islam;Ali Farooq;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir

  • Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective

    A.K.M. Najmul Islam;A.K.M. Najmul Islam;Samuli Laato;Shamim Talukder;Erkki Sutinen

  • What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?

    Samuli Laato;A. K. M. Najmul Islam;Muhammad Nazrul Islam;Eoin Whelan

  • Impact of Online Information on Self-Isolation Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.

    Ali Farooq;Samuli Laato;A K M Najmul Islam

  • Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda

    Anushree Tandon;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;A.K.M. Najmul Islam;A.K.M. Najmul Islam;Matti Mäntymäki

  • Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context

    A.K.M. Najmul Islam

  • Point of adoption and beyond. Initial trust and mobile-payment continuation intention

    Shalini Talwar;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Ashraf Khalil;Geetha Mohan

  • Big data analytics in healthcare: a systematic literature review

    Sayantan Khanra;Sayantan Khanra;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;A. K. M. Najmul Islam;Matti Mäntymäki

  • Is boredom proneness related to social media overload and fatigue? A stress–strain–outcome approach

    Eoin Whelan;A. K. M. Najmul Islam;Stoney L. Brooks

  • Positive and negative word of mouth (WOM) are not necessarily opposites: A reappraisal using the dual factor theory

    Manish Talwar;Shalini Talwar;Puneet Kaur;Puneet Kaur;A.K.M. Najmul Islam

  • Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance

    Eoin Whelan;A. K. M. Najmul Islam;Stoney L. Brooks

  • E-learning system use and its outcomes

    A.K.M. Najmul Islam

  • Why do People Share Misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

    Samuli Laato;A. K. M. Najmul Islam;Muhammad Nazrul Islam;Eoin Whelan

  • Sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with a learning management system in post-adoption stage: A critical incident technique approach

    A. K. M. Najmul Islam

  • Investigating usability of mobile health applications in Bangladesh

    Muhammad Nazrul Islam;Md. Mahboob Karim;Toki Tahmid Inan;A. K. M. Najmul Islam

  • The Janus face of Facebook

    Matti Mäntymäki;A.K.M. Najmul Islam

  • Challenges, Applications and Design Aspects of Federated Learning: A Survey

    K. M. Jawadur Rahman;Faisal Ahmed;Nazma Akhter;Mohammad Hasan

  • The dark side of social media: Stalking, online self-disclosure and problematic sleep

    Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Amandeep Dhir;Shalini Talwar;Puneet Kaur;Puneet Kaur;Sunil Budhiraja

  • The Role of Perceived System Quality as Educators’ Motivation to Continue E-learning System Use

    A.K.M. Najmul Islam

  • Satisfaction and continuance with a learning management system

    A.K.M. Najmul Islam;Nasreen Azad

  • The Determinants of the Post-Adoption Satisfaction of Educators with an E-Learning System

    A. K. M. Najmul Islam

Frequent Co-Authors

Matti Mäntymäki
Matti Mäntymäki University of Turku
Amandeep Dhir
Amandeep Dhir University of Agder
Izak Benbasat
Izak Benbasat University of British Columbia
Alexander Serenko
Alexander Serenko University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Erkki Sutinen
Erkki Sutinen University of Turku
Iqbal H. Sarker
Iqbal H. Sarker Edith Cowan University
David Wilson
David Wilson Binghamton University
Ofir Turel
Ofir Turel California State University, Fullerton
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Markku Renfors
Markku Renfors Tampere University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up a range of flexible options and career opportunities. Many accredited universities now offer accessible online programs, making it easier for students from various backgrounds to start their journey—even those searching for universities for low gpa are finding more options than ever.

Accelerated programs have become increasingly popular for those wanting to enter the workforce quickly. If you want to earn your degree faster, check out the fastest computer science degree paths available online. These can help you save time and reduce costs.

Many students also consider alternative or complementary fields. For example, if you’re interested in the intersection of technology and the environment, explore the online environmental engineering degree options for affordable interdisciplinary learning. Graduates from these and other science programs have numerous career paths. For more details, discover what can i do with an environmental science degree and how it can expand your job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing A. K. M. Najmul Islam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles