World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
9025
World Ranking
4075
National Ranking
1851

Samuel M. Wu publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel M. Wu sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 230 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Samuel M. Wu D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel M. Wu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samuel M. Wu is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine, with a particular focus on molecular biology, surgery, epidemiology, oncology, and immunology. Wu's work frequently addresses significant biomedical topics including monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, respiratory viral infections, immunotherapy and immune responses, cancer and associated metabolic processes, RNA modifications in cancer, pneumonia and respiratory infections, as well as tracheal and airway disorders.

Wu has contributed to numerous papers, including recent publications such as:

  • Intranasal parainfluenza virus type 5 (PIV5)-vectored RSV vaccine is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults in a phase 1 clinical study (2023) published in Science Advances
  • Tumor-wide RNA splicing aberrations generate immunogenic public neoantigens (2023) published in Research Square
  • Safety and immunogenicity of intranasal parainfluenza virus type 5 (PIV5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in adults and teens in an open-label phase 1 trial (2025) published in Science Advances
  • Perioperative Management of Calciphylaxis: Literature Review and Treatment Recommendations (2022) published in Orthopedic Reviews
  • Abstract 4250: Tumor-wide RNA splicing aberrations generate immunogenic public neoantigens across cancers (2025) published in Cancer Research

Samuel M. Wu often collaborates with a group of co-authors, frequently working with:

  • Nicholas Stevers
  • Darwin Kwok
  • Chibo Hong
  • J Costello
  • Hideho Okada

Wu's publications appear prominently in selected venues, with multiple works featured in:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Science Advances
  • Research Square
  • Orthopedic Reviews
  • Cancer Research

Their research intersects the fields of Medicine broadly and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology more specifically. Within these disciplines, molecular biology is a core subfield, with significant contributions also in surgery, epidemiology, oncology, and immunology.

Best Publications

  • mTORC1-independent TFEB activation via Akt inhibition promotes cellular clearance in neurodegenerative storage diseases

    Michela Palmieri;Rituraj Pal;Hemanth R. Nelvagal;Parisa Lotfi

  • Light-Evoked Excitatory and Inhibitory Synaptic Inputs to ON and OFF α Ganglion Cells in the Mouse Retina

    Ji-Jie Pang;Fan Gao;Samuel M. Wu

  • Correction: Corrigendum: mTORC1-independent TFEB activation via Akt inhibition promotes cellular clearance in neurodegenerative storage diseases

    Michela Palmieri;Rituraj Pal;Hemanth R. Nelvagal;Parisa Lotfi

  • SCA7 knockin mice model human SCA7 and reveal gradual accumulation of mutant ataxin-7 in neurons and abnormalities in short-term plasticity.

    Seung Yun Yoo;Mark E. Pennesi;Edwin J. Weeber;Bisong Xu

  • Functional architecture of synapses in the inner retina: segregation of visual signals by stratification of bipolar cell axon terminals.

    Samuel M. Wu;Fan Gao;Bruce R. Maple

  • Localization and modulatory actions of zinc in vertebrate retina

    Samuel M. Wu;Qiao Xiaoxi;Jeffrey L. Noebels;Xiong Li Yang

  • Signal clipping by the rod output synapse.

    David Attwell;Salvador Borges;Samuel M. Wu;Martin Wilson

  • Input-output relations of the feedback synapse between horizontal cells and cones in the tiger salamander retina.

    S. M. Wu

  • BETA2/NeuroD1 Null Mice: A New Model for Transcription Factor-Dependent Photoreceptor Degeneration

    Mark E. Pennesi;Jang Hyeon Cho;Zhuo Yang;Schonmei H. Wu

  • Amino acid neurotransmitters in the retina: a functional overview

    Samuel M Wu;Bruce R Maple

  • A quantitative analysis of interactions between photoreceptors in the salamander (Ambystoma) retina.

    D Attwell;M Wilson;S M Wu

  • Melatonin enhances horizontal cell sensitivity in salamander retina.

    Allan F. Wiechmann;Xiong Li Yang;Samuel M. Wu;Joe G. Hollyfield

  • Phenotypic characterization of Bbs4 null mice reveals age-dependent penetrance and variable expressivity

    Erica R. Eichers;Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr;Richard Paylor;Richard Alan Lewis

  • Elevated intraocular pressure causes inner retinal dysfunction before cell loss in a mouse model of experimental glaucoma.

    Benjamin J. Frankfort;A. Kareem Khan;Dennis Y. Tse;Inyoung Chung;Inyoung Chung

  • Feedforward lateral inhibition in retinal bipolar cells: input-output relation of the horizontal cell-depolarizing bipolar cell synapse.

    Xiong-Li Yang;Samuel M. Wu

  • Direct rod input to cone BCs and direct cone input to rod BCs challenge the traditional view of mammalian BC circuitry

    Ji-Jie Pang;Fan Gao;Janis Lem;Debra E. Bramblett

  • Feedback connections and operation of the outer plexiform layer of the retina

    Unknown

  • Genetic dissection of rod and cone pathways in the dark-adapted mouse retina.

    Muhammad Mostafa Abd-El-Barr;Mark E Pennesi;Shannon M Saszik;Andrew J Barrow

  • The retinoid cycle and retina disease.

    Wolfgang Baehr;Samuel M Wu;Alan C Bird;Krzysztof Palczewski

  • Effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid on cones and bipolar cells of the tiger salamander retina.

    Samuel M. Wu

  • Neural interactions mediating the detection of motion in the retina of the tiger salamander.

    Frank Werblin;Greg Maguire;Peter Lukasiewicz;Scott Eliasof

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Paul
David L. Paul Harvard University
Theodore G. Wensel
Theodore G. Wensel Baylor College of Medicine
Christian P. Schaaf
Christian P. Schaaf Baylor College of Medicine
Jing Wang
Jing Wang The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jonathan D. Cooper
Jonathan D. Cooper Washington University in St. Louis
Graeme Mardon
Graeme Mardon Baylor College of Medicine
Sanford L. Boye
Sanford L. Boye University of Florida
Frank S. Werblin
Frank S. Werblin University of California, Berkeley
Ronald Roepman
Ronald Roepman Radboud University
Rui Chen
Rui Chen Capital Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Samuel M. Wu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles