World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Pakistan
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
70
Citations
20374
World Ranking
1868
National Ranking
1

Muhammad Akram publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muhammad Akram sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 760 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Muhammad Akram D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Muhammad Akram sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Pakistan Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Pakistan Leader Award

Overview

Muhammad Akram is affiliated with the University of the Punjab in Pakistan. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Decision Sciences and Computer Science, with significant contributions in related subfields that include Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Statistics and Probability, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's main topics of work encompass Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Optimization and Mathematical Programming, Fuzzy Systems and Optimization, Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory, Advanced Algebra and Logic, and Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems.

Among recent papers, Muhammad Akram has authored studies such as "Group decision-making based on complex spherical fuzzy VIKOR approach" published in 2021 by Knowledge-Based Systems, "Decision-making model under complex picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators" published in 2020 in Computational and Applied Mathematics, "Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS method for multiple-attribute group decision analysis" published in 2023 in Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, and "Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information" published in 2020 by Neural Computing and Applications.

In addition to journal articles, Muhammad Akram has contributed to book publications primarily represented by Springer Nature. Titles include "Fuzzy Hypergraphs and Related Extensions" (2020), "Graphs for the Analysis of Bipolar Fuzzy Information" (2020), "Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods with Bipolar Fuzzy Sets" (2023), and "Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods with Multi-polar Fuzzy Information" (2023).

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Muhammad Akram include José Carlos R. Alcantud, Tofigh Allahviranloo, Sumera Naz, Musavarah Sarwar, and Anam Luqman.

Common publication venues where Muhammad Akram's work frequently appears include Granular Computing, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, Soft Computing, and Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

Best Publications

  • Bipolar fuzzy graphs

    Muhammad Akram

  • Interval-valued fuzzy graphs

    Muhammad Akram;Wieslaw A. Dudek

  • Strong Intuitionistic Fuzzy Graphs

    Muhammad Akram;Bijan Davvaz

  • Intuitionistic fuzzy hypergraphs with applications

    Muhammad Akram;Wieslaw A. Dudek

  • Group decision-making based on complex spherical fuzzy VIKOR approach

    Muhammad Akram;Cengiz Kahraman;Kiran Zahid

  • Group decision‐making based on pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method

    Muhammad Akram;Wieslaw A. Dudek;Farwa Ilyas

  • Bipolar fuzzy graphs with applications

    Muhammad Akram

  • Mini-review on Glycolysis and Cancer

    M. Akram

  • Multi-criteria group decision making based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information

    Muhammad Akram;Farwa Ilyas;Harish Garg

  • Regular bipolar fuzzy graphs

    Muhammad Akram;Wieslaw A. Dudek

  • RETRACTED: Fuzzy N-soft sets: A novel model with applications

    Unknown

  • Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS method for multiple-attribute group decision analysis

    Unknown

  • Decision-making model under complex picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators: M. Akram et al.

    Unknown

  • Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy aggregation operators with application in multicriteria decision‐making

    Muhammad Akram;Wieslaw A. Dudek;Jawaria Mohsan Dar

  • Decision-Making Analysis Based on Fermatean Fuzzy Yager Aggregation Operators with Application in COVID-19 Testing Facility

    Harish Garg;Gulfam Shahzadi;Muhammad Akram

  • Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment

    M. A. Alghamdi;Noura Omair Alshehri;Muhammad Akram

  • Effects of medicinal plants on Alzheimer's disease and memory deficits

    Muhammad Akram;Allah Nawaz

  • -Step fuzzy competition graphs

    Unknown

  • Group decision-making methods based on hesitant N-soft sets

    Muhammad Akram;Arooj Adeel;José Carlos R. Alcantud

  • Fuzzy N-soft sets: A novel model with applications

    Muhammad Akram;Arooj Adeel;José Carlos R. Alcantud

  • A Novel Approach to Decision-Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Information

    Sumera Naz;Samina Ashraf;Muhammad Akram

  • Recent progress in optical chemical sensors.

    Hummad Habib Qazi;Abu Bakar bin Mohammad;Muhammad Akram

  • Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis

    Muhammad Akram;Shumaiza;Maham Arshad

  • RETRACTED: Hesitant fuzzy N-soft sets: A new model with applications in decision-making

    Unknown

  • Double domination on intuitionistic fuzzy graphs

    A. Nagoorgani;Muhammad Akram;S. Anupriya

  • The admissible parameter space for exponential smoothing models

    Robin John Hyndman;Muhammad Akram;Blyth C Archibald

Frequent Co-Authors

Florentin Smarandache
Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico
Bijan Davvaz
Bijan Davvaz Yazd University
Muhammad Riaz
Muhammad Riaz South China Agricultural University
Muhammad Shahid
Muhammad Shahid COMSATS University Islamabad
Tofigh Allahviranloo
Tofigh Allahviranloo Istinye University
Muhammad Ashraf
Muhammad Ashraf University of Agriculture Faisalabad
Peide Liu
Peide Liu Shandong University of Finance and Economics
Xindong Peng
Xindong Peng National University of Defense Technology
Muhammad Farooq
Muhammad Farooq Sultan Qaboos University
Harish Garg
Harish Garg Thapar University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and evolving career options. If you’re interested in engineering, consider online mechanical engineering degrees that blend technological problem-solving with core science skills. These flexible programs are designed for students seeking affordability without sacrificing quality.

For those drawn to foundational science, pursuing an online theoretical physics degree can strengthen your analytical capabilities and complement your computer science knowledge. This interdisciplinary approach is valuable in today’s data-driven world.

The tech industry is also seeing high demand for data scientists. Earning a data science degree can help you gain crucial skills in analytics, machine learning, and big data, positioning you for roles in research, finance, healthcare, and beyond.

Additionally, an understanding of hardware is beneficial for computer science students. Careers and specializations in electronics are accessible through the online electrical engineering career outcomes pathway, leading to opportunities in automation, robotics, and embedded systems.

Best Scientists Citing Muhammad Akram

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles