World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
4866
World Ranking
7950
National Ranking
3411

Peter D. Lukasiewicz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Lukasiewicz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter D. Lukasiewicz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Lukasiewicz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter D. Lukasiewicz is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these areas, their main subfields of study include cellular and molecular neuroscience as well as molecular biology.

The scientist focuses on topics related to photoreceptor and optogenetics research, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and retinal development and disorders. These topics reflect an emphasis on the functional mechanisms of the visual system and its molecular underpinnings.

Peter D. Lukasiewicz has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Gregory W. Bligard
  • James D. DeBrecht
  • Robert G. Smith

Their recent published work includes a paper titled "Light-evoked glutamate transporter EAAT5 activation coordinates with conventional feedback inhibition to control rod bipolar cell output," which appeared in 2020 in the Journal of Neurophysiology. This publication has received citations reflecting engagement from the scientific community.

Publication venues in which they have contributed include:

  • Journal of Neurophysiology

Best Publications

  • A novel GABA receptor on bipolar cell terminals in the tiger salamander retina

    Peter Lukasiewicz;Bruce R. Maple;Frank S. Werblin

  • A novel GABA receptor modulates synaptic transmission from bipolar to ganglion and amacrine cells in the tiger salamander retina

    PD Lukasiewicz;FS Werblin

  • Elimination of the ρ1 Subunit Abolishes GABACReceptor Expression and Alters Visual Processing in the Mouse Retina

    Maureen A. McCall;Peter D. Lukasiewicz;Ronald G. Gregg;Neal S. Peachey;Neal S. Peachey;Neal S. Peachey

  • GABAC receptors in the vertebrate retina.

    Peter D. Lukasiewicz

  • Gamma-aminobutyrate type B receptor modulation of L-type calcium channel current at bipolar cell terminals in the retina of the tiger salamander.

    Greg Maguire;Bruce Maple;Peter Lukasiewicz;Frank Werblin

  • Different combinations of GABAA and GABAC receptors confer distinct temporal properties to retinal synaptic responses.

    Peter D. Lukasiewicz;Colleen R. Shields

  • Multiple pathways of inhibition shape bipolar cell responses in the retina.

    Erika D. Eggers;Peter D. Lukasiewicz

  • Distinct Ionotropic GABA Receptors Mediate Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Inhibition in Retinal Bipolar Cells

    Colleen R. Shields;My N. Tran;Rachel O. L. Wong;Peter D. Lukasiewicz

  • A slowly inactivating potassium current truncates spike activity in ganglion cells of the tiger salamander retina

    P Lukasiewicz;F Werblin

  • GABAA, GABAC and glycine receptor‐mediated inhibition differentially affects light‐evoked signalling from mouse retinal rod bipolar cells

    Erika D. Eggers;Peter D. Lukasiewicz

  • Presynaptic Inhibition Modulates Spillover, Creating Distinct Dynamic Response Ranges of Sensory Output

    Botir T. Sagdullaev;Maureen A. McCall;Peter D. Lukasiewicz

  • Amacrine cells in the tiger salamander retina: morphology, physiology, and neurotransmitter identification.

    Chen‐Yu Yang;Peter Lukasiewicz;Greg Maguire;Frank S. Werblin

  • Nyctalopin Expression in Retinal Bipolar Cells Restores Visual Function in a Mouse Model of Complete X-Linked Congenital Stationary Night Blindness

    Ronald George Gregg;Maarten Kamermans;Jan Klooster;Peter D Lukasiewicz

  • GABAC receptor-mediated inhibition in the retina.

    Peter D. Lukasiewicz;Erika D. Eggers;Botir T. Sagdullaev;Maureen A. McCall

  • Age-Dependent and Cell Class-Specific Modulation of Retinal Ganglion Cell Bursting Activity by GABA

    Ken F. Fischer;Peter D. Lukasiewicz;Rachel O. L. Wong

  • Amacrine cell interactions underlying the response to change in the tiger salamander retina.

    G Maguire;P Lukasiewicz;F Werblin

  • Functional Deficits Precede Structural Lesions in Mice With High-Fat Diet-Induced Diabetic Retinopathy.

    Rithwick Rajagopal;Gregory W. Bligard;Sheng Zhang;Li Yin

  • Presynaptic inhibition differentially shapes transmission in distinct circuits in the mouse retina.

    Erika D. Eggers;Maureen A. McCall;Peter D. Lukasiewicz

  • Action Potentials Are Required for the Lateral Transmission of Glycinergic Transient Inhibition in the Amphibian Retina

    Paul B. Cook;Peter D. Lukasiewicz;John S. McReynolds

  • Neural interactions mediating the detection of motion in the retina of the tiger salamander.

    Frank Werblin;Greg Maguire;Peter Lukasiewicz;Scott Eliasof

Frequent Co-Authors

Rachel O.L. Wong
Rachel O.L. Wong University of Washington
Neal S. Peachey
Neal S. Peachey Cleveland Clinic
Steven J. Fliesler
Steven J. Fliesler University at Buffalo, State University of New York
John W. Olney
John W. Olney Washington University in St. Louis
Clay F. Semenkovich
Clay F. Semenkovich Washington University in St. Louis
Martin Kerschensteiner
Martin Kerschensteiner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Thomas Misgeld
Thomas Misgeld Technical University of Munich
Jonathan B. Demb
Jonathan B. Demb Yale University
Frank S. Werblin
Frank S. Werblin University of California, Berkeley
Daniel Kerschensteiner
Daniel Kerschensteiner Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter D. Lukasiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles