World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4962
World Ranking
10852
National Ranking
623

David Berle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Berle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Berle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Berle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Berle is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia and has a research focus primarily within the field of Psychology, with a notable specialization in Clinical Psychology. Their scholarly work spans various related subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research interests cover a range of topics with particular emphasis on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research, Migration, Health and Trauma, and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development. Additional focal areas in their work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Mental Health Research Topics, and Child Abuse and Trauma.

David Berle has published research in several academic venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Psychiatric Quarterly
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Their recent publication record includes papers such as:

  • Recent Insights Into Cyberchondria (2020, Current Psychiatry Reports)
  • Cyberchondria in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies)
  • Compulsive Health-Related Internet Use and Cyberchondria (2020, European Addiction Research)
  • Trauma-focused psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (2021, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica)
  • Unveiling the relationships between cyberchondria and psychopathological symptoms (2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research)

Their collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Vladan Starčević, Zachary Steel, Kirupamani Viswasam, Amalia Badawi, and Kris Rogers, reflecting ongoing partnerships in related research areas.

Best Publications

  • Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use

    Vladan Starcevic;David Berle

  • The relationships between health anxiety, online health information seeking, and cyberchondria: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ryan D. McMullan;David Berle;Sandra Arnáez;Vladan Starcevic

  • Recognizing problem video game use.

    Guy Porter;Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;Pauline Fenech

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Unified Protocol as a transdiagnostic emotion regulation based intervention.

    Nathan Sakiris;David Berle;David Berle

  • Thought-action fusion: review of the literature and future directions.

    David Berle;Vladan Starcevic

  • Cognitive specificity of anxiety disorders: a review of selected key constructs

    Vladan Starcevic;David Berle

  • Recent Insights Into Cyberchondria.

    Vladan Starcevic;Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;David Berle;Sandra Arnáez

  • Disgust and obsessive-compulsive disorder: an update

    David Berle;Emily S. Phillips

  • Preliminary validation of an ultra-brief version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire

    David Berle;Vladan Starcevic;Karen Moses;Anthony Hannan

  • Cyberchondria in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Vladan Starcevic;Adriano Schimmenti;Joël Billieux;David Berle;David Berle

  • Cyberchondria and its Relationships with Related Constructs: a Network Analysis.

    Vladan Starcevic;Vladan Starcevic;Stéphanie Baggio;Stéphanie Baggio;David Berle;David Berle;Yasser Khazaal

  • Functions of compulsions in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;Vlasios Brakoulias;Peter Sammut

  • The association between visa insecurity and mental health, disability and social engagement in refugees living in Australia

    Angela Nickerson;Yulisha Byrow;Meaghan O'Donnell;Vicki Mau

  • Pathological worry, anxiety disorders and the impact of co-occurrence with depressive and other anxiety disorders.

    Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;Denise Milicevic;Anthony Hannan

  • "Side effects' of ECT are mainly depressive phenomena and are independent of age.

    Henry Brodaty;David Berle;Ian Hickie;Ian Hickie;Catherine Mason

  • Problem Video Game Use and Dimensions of Psychopathology

    Vladan Starcevic;Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;Guy Porter;Pauline Fenech

  • Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder co-occurring with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Conceptual and clinical implications.

    Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;Vlasios Brakoulias;Peter Sammut

  • Compulsive Health-Related Internet Use and Cyberchondria.

    Yasser Khazaal;Anne Chatton;Lucien Rochat;Vincent Hede

  • Trauma-focused psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Brooke Jericho;Aileen Luo;David Berle;David Berle

  • The association between trauma experienced during incarceration and PTSD outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Alicia Piper;David Berle

  • The characteristics of unacceptable/taboo thoughts in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Vlasios Brakoulias;Vladan Starcevic;David Berle;Denise Milicevic

  • Disgust propensity in obsessive–compulsive disorder: Cross-sectional and prospective relationships

    David Berle;Vladan Starcevic;Vlasios Brakoulias;Peter Sammut

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladan Starcevic
Vladan Starcevic University of Sydney
Zachary Steel
Zachary Steel University of New South Wales
Anthony J. Hannan
Anthony J. Hannan Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
Michelle L. Moulds
Michelle L. Moulds University of New South Wales
Yasser Khazaal
Yasser Khazaal University of Lausanne
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Meaghan O'Donnell
Meaghan O'Donnell University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up numerous career opportunities, particularly in the field of therapy and counseling. Many students consider becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) due to increasing demand for mental health professionals. To begin this career, you’ll need to meet specific educational and licensing requirements, which can vary by state and city.

For those interested in practicing in California, it’s useful to understand how to become an mft in Sacramento and San Diego mft certification requirements. Each region has its own unique processes and regulations. Similarly, if you’re looking toward the Midwest, learning how to become an mft in Saint Paul will shed light on Minnesota’s pathway to licensure. In Texas, understanding how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Antonio is crucial for those planning to practice in San Antonio.

Exploring online psychology degrees can be a flexible way to start your journey. Accredited online programs often prepare students to meet these regional requirements and advance toward clinical licensure and rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing David Berle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles