What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Management
- Social science
- Information technology
His primary areas of study are Knowledge management, Information quality, Management information systems, Quality and Strategic information system.
His Knowledge management research includes elements of Is success model and Creativity.
His Information quality study incorporates themes from Service quality and Management science.
Quality is frequently linked to Harm in his study.
The concepts of his Strategic information system study are interwoven with issues in E-commerce, Information engineering and The Internet.
Ephraim R. McLean incorporates a variety of subjects into his writings, including User satisfaction, Variables and Expectation confirmation theory.
His most cited work include:
- Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable (7697 citations)
- The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update (6603 citations)
- Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships (1091 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Ephraim R. McLean mostly deals with Knowledge management, Information technology, Management information systems, Public relations and Process management.
His Knowledge management research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Electronic business and Information quality.
Information quality and User satisfaction are two areas of study in which Ephraim R. McLean engages in interdisciplinary work.
Ephraim R. McLean integrates several fields in his works, including Information technology and Strategic advantage.
His research integrates issues of Information management, Management science and Marketing in his study of Management information systems.
Process management is closely attributed to Strategic planning in his research.
He most often published in these fields:
- Knowledge management (36.84%)
- Information technology (15.04%)
- Management information systems (14.29%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2019)?
- Knowledge management (36.84%)
- Management information systems (14.29%)
- Information technology (15.04%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ephraim R. McLean spends much of his time researching Knowledge management, Management information systems, Information technology, World Wide Web and Public relations.
The Knowledge management study combines topics in areas such as Service and Information technology management.
His Service research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Information engineering and Information Processes and Technology.
His study in the field of Strategic information system is also linked to topics like Legend, Research community, George and Art history.
His work deals with themes such as Information infrastructure and Conceptual model, which intersect with Strategic information system.
His Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Staffing and Action.
Between 2013 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Information Technology for Management : Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy (325 citations)
- The 2015 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study (85 citations)
- Theoretical perspectives in IS research: from variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit (69 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Management
- Social science
- Information technology
His main research concerns Knowledge management, Information technology, Management information systems, Regional science and Economic shortage.
Ephraim R. McLean applies his multidisciplinary studies on Knowledge management and Decision support system in his research.
His study of Information technology brings together topics like Section, Success factors, Order and Field.
His Management information systems research includes themes of Conceptual model and Management science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
