World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
10483
World Ranking
9540
National Ranking
4045

Peter Reiher publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Reiher sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 170 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Reiher D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Reiher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Reiher is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research contributions predominantly fall within the domain of Computer Science, with thirteen publications focusing on various subfields.

The subfields of study Peter Reiher has contributed to include:

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems
  • Management Science and Operations Research

The main topics addressed in their work are:

  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Network Packet Processing and Optimization
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Defense, Military, and Policy Studies

Peter Reiher's recent scholarly output includes publications in recognized venues. Notable papers include:

  • "On Explainable and Adaptable Detection of Distributed Denial-of-Service Traffic" (2023) published in IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • "On Capturing DDoS Traffic Footprints on the Internet" (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • "Adaptive Distributed Filtering of DDoS Traffic on the Internet" (2023) published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jun Li
  • Devkishen Sisodia
  • Lumin Shi
  • Yebo Feng
  • Mingwei Zhang

Peter Reiher has published primarily in the IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, alongside contributions to arXiv (Cornell University).

Best Publications

  • A taxonomy of DDoS attack and DDoS defense mechanisms

    Jelena Mirkovic;Peter Reiher

  • PARAID: a gear-shifting power-aware RAID

    Charles Weddle;Mathew Oldham;Jin Qian;An-I Andy Wang

  • Attacking DDoS at the source

    J. Mirkovic;G. Prier;P. Reiher

  • Internet Denial of Service: Attack and Defense Mechanisms (Radia Perlman Computer Networking and Security)

    Jelena Mirkovic;Sven Dietrich;David Dittrich;Peter Reiher

  • Saving portable computer battery power through remote process execution

    Alexey Rudenko;Peter Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • Host-to-Host Congestion Control for TCP

    Alexander Afanasyev;Neil Tilley;Peter Reiher;Leonard Kleinrock

  • SAVE: source address validity enforcement protocol

    Jun Li;J. Mirkovic;Mengqiu Wang;P. Reiher

  • Resolving file conflicts in the Ficus file system

    Peter Reiher;John Heidemann;David Ratner;Greg Skinner

  • D-WARD: a source-end defense against flooding denial-of-service attacks

    J. Mirkovic;P. Reiher

  • Detecting insider threats by monitoring system call activity

    N. Nguyen;P. Reiher;G.H. Kuenning

  • D-ward: source-end defense against distributed denial-of-service attacks

    Jelena Mirkovic;Mario Gerla;Peter Reiher

  • A Framework for a Collaborative DDoS Defense

    G. Oikonomou;J. Mirkovic;P. Reiher;M. Robinson

  • Rumor : Mobile data access through optimistic peer-to-peer replication

    R. Guy;P. Reiher;D. Ratner;M. Gunter

  • The remote processing framework for portable computer power saving

    Alexey Rudenko;Peter Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • Conquest: Better Performance Through a Disk/Persistent-RAM Hybrid File System

    An-I Wang;Peter L. Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • VIRTUAL TIME BASED DYNAMIC LOAD MANAGEMENT IN THE TIME WARP OPERATING SYSTEM

    Peter L. Reiher;David Jefferson

  • The Conquest file system: Better performance through a disk/persistent-RAM hybrid design

    An-I Andy Wang;Geoff Kuenning;Peter Reiher;Gerald Popek

  • Replication requirements in mobile environments

    David Ratner;Peter Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • Alliance formation for DDoS defense

    Jelena Mirkovic;Max Robinson;Peter Reiher

  • A conceptual framework for network and client adaptation

    B. Badrinath;Armando Fox;Leonard Kleinrock;Gerald Popek

  • Perspectives on optimistically replicated, peer-to-peer filing

    T. W. Page;T. W. Page;R. G. Guy;J. S. Heidemann;D. H. Ratner

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald J. Popek
Gerald J. Popek University of California, Los Angeles
Mario Gerla
Mario Gerla University of California, Los Angeles
Leonard Kleinrock
Leonard Kleinrock University of California, Los Angeles
Sonia Fahmy
Sonia Fahmy Purdue University West Lafayette
Evaggelia Pitoura
Evaggelia Pitoura University of Ioannina
John Heidemann
John Heidemann University of Southern California
Ouri Wolfson
Ouri Wolfson University of Illinois at Chicago
Lixia Zhang
Lixia Zhang University of California, Los Angeles
Peter Scheuermann
Peter Scheuermann Northwestern University
Rajive Bagrodia
Rajive Bagrodia Scalable Network Technologies (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary fields. For those interested in environmental sustainability, earning a degree from environmental engineering schools online blends computer skills with practical solutions for real-world issues like green technology and resource management.

If you prefer working with machines or robotics, an online degree in mechanical engineering can complement a computer science background. It helps graduates understand automation, design processes, and the integration of software with hardware systems—which are crucial in today’s tech-driven industries.

For students interested in the fundamental theories behind computing, online physics degrees provide a solid foundation in analytical thinking and problem-solving, both vital for careers in research or advanced technology sectors.

Finally, data analysis is a rapidly expanding field. Earning the cheapest data science degree online is a cost-effective way to gain essential skills for jobs in business, healthcare, and tech. With so many pathways available, students can design a career path that matches their passions and the demands of the digital age.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Reiher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles