World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
9770
World Ranking
6791
National Ranking
2989

Gerald J. Popek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald J. Popek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gerald J. Popek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald J. Popek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerald J. Popek was affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the academic community primarily within this institution.

Though specific details about their publications, including recent papers, are not documented here, Gerald J. Popek's professional standing is associated with the academic and research disciplines related to their work at UCLA.

No records of frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study were provided for Gerald J. Popek. Likewise, there is no detailed information about main research topics or awards achieved during their career.

Gerald J. Popek is noted as deceased. This profile reflects available factual information based on recorded academic affiliation and absence of further publication or collaborative data.

Best Publications

  • Formal requirements for virtualizable third generation architectures

    Gerald J. Popek;Robert P. Goldberg

  • The LOCUS distributed operating system

    Bruce Walker;Gerald Popek;Robert English;Charles Kline

  • Detection of mutual inconsistency in distributed systems

    D S Parker;G J Popek;G Rudisin;A Stoughton

  • Report on the programming language Euclid

    B. W. Lampson;J. J. Horning;R. L. London;J. G. Mitchell

  • Saving portable computer battery power through remote process execution

    Alexey Rudenko;Peter Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • Implementation of the Ficus Replicated File System.

    Richard G. Guy;John S. Heidemann;Wai-Kei Mak;Thomas W. Page

  • File-system development with stackable layers

    John S. Heidemann;Gerald J. Popek

  • The LOCUS Distributed System Architecture

    Gerald J. Popek;Bruce J. Walker

  • LOCUS a network transparent, high reliability distributed system

    G. Popek;B. Walker;J. Chow;D. Edwards

  • Automated hoarding for mobile computers

    Geoffrey H. Kuenning;Gerald J. Popek

  • Resolving file conflicts in the Ficus file system

    Peter Reiher;John Heidemann;David Ratner;Greg Skinner

  • Mirage: a coherent distributed shared memory design

    B. Fleisch;G. Popek

  • Encryption and Secure Computer Networks

    Gerald J. Popek;Charles S. Kline

  • Specification and verification of the UCLA Unix security kernel

    Bruce J. Walker;Richard A. Kemmerer;Gerald J. Popek

  • Proof rules for the programming language Euclid

    R. L. London;J. V. Guttag;J. J. Horning;B. W. Lampson

  • Rumor : Mobile data access through optimistic peer-to-peer replication

    R. Guy;P. Reiher;D. Ratner;M. Gunter

  • The remote processing framework for portable computer power saving

    Alexey Rudenko;Peter Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • Conquest: Better Performance Through a Disk/Persistent-RAM Hybrid File System

    An-I Wang;Peter L. Reiher;Gerald J. Popek;Geoffrey H. Kuenning

  • Replication in Ficus distributed file systems

    G.J. Popek;R.G. Guy;T.W. Page;J.S. Heidemann

  • The Conquest file system: Better performance through a disk/persistent-RAM hybrid design

    An-I Andy Wang;Geoff Kuenning;Peter Reiher;Gerald Popek

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Reiher
Peter Reiher University of California, Los Angeles
John Heidemann
John Heidemann University of Southern California
Leonard Kleinrock
Leonard Kleinrock University of California, Los Angeles
Butler W. Lampson
Butler W. Lampson Microsoft (United States)
Johanna D. Moore
Johanna D. Moore University of Edinburgh
Rajive Bagrodia
Rajive Bagrodia Scalable Network Technologies (United States)
Richard R. Muntz
Richard R. Muntz University of California, Los Angeles
Mahadev Satyanarayanan
Mahadev Satyanarayanan Carnegie Mellon University
Armando Fox
Armando Fox University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, you may want to consider the flexibility and affordability of online programs. Pursuing an online bachelors degree can be a practical choice for students seeking balance between education, work, and other commitments. These programs often provide asynchronous coursework, allowing for a self-paced learning experience.

For those interested in technical and engineering fields, there are online engineering degrees that offer specialized tracks in areas closely related to Computer Science. Many of these degrees are designed to meet industry demands and prepare graduates for rewarding careers in technology and innovation.

As your career progresses, you might look into affordable online executive mba programs, which can help you develop essential leadership and management skills for tech-driven industries. These affordable online executive mba programs are particularly valuable for professionals aiming to move into upper management roles.

Alternatively, if your interests shift toward information management, exploring an mlis degree online cost can open pathways in digital libraries and data curation. These online degrees are designed to be cost-effective while offering the advanced skills needed for evolving digital information environments.

Best Scientists Citing Gerald J. Popek

Recently Published Articles