World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4111 438 168 20103

Stephen Morley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen Morley between 1976 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen Morley published across 47 years, from 1976 to 2022, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2017. 3 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2017. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 3 publications
1976 2022

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen Morley: publications per year, 1976 to 2022
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 3
1978 1
1979 3
1980 0
1981 3
1982 2
1983 0
1984 2
1985 3
1986 3
1987 4
1988 2
1989 5
1990 2
1991 1
1992 3
1993 3
1994 1
1995 4
1996 5
1997 3
1998 2
1999 4
2000 7
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 7
2005 9
2006 3
2007 6
2008 9
2009 8
2010 10
2011 8
2012 8
2013 4
2014 6
2015 10
2016 4
2017 11
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 3
Total 188
Download as CSV

Stephen Morley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Morley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 168
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen Morley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Morley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen Morley was affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spanned the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on multiple subfields including Toxicology, Biochemistry, Physiology, Nephrology, and Surgery.

The main topics of their scientific work involved:

  • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Sulfur Compounds in Biology
  • Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Renal function and acid-base balance
  • Paraquat toxicity studies and treatments
  • Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Morley published research that appeared predominantly in the journal Annales de Toxicologie Analytique, contributing three papers to this venue. The recent publications included:

  • Detection of novel benzodiazepines in post-mortem cases (2022, Annales de Toxicologie Analytique)
  • Sodium nitrite poisoning; A case series of 15 fatalities (2022, Annales de Toxicologie Analytique)
  • Validation of gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) qualitative method for detection of paraquat in postmortem samples by sodium borohydride-platinum chloride chemical reduction (2022, Annales de Toxicologie Analytique)

Their collaborative work involved several frequent co-authors, including Kirsten L. Rock, Nicola J. Kalk, Caroline S. Copeland, Laura Hikin, and Amrita Ahluwalia. These collaborations were reflected across multiple publications, indicating active engagement within their research network focused on toxicological analyses and biochemical methods.

Best Publications

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding headache

    Stephen Morley;Christopher Eccleston;Amanda Williams

  • A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale.

    R P Snaith;M Hamilton;S Morley;A Humayan

  • Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults

    Amanda C de C Williams;Christopher Eccleston;Stephen Morley

  • Behavioural treatment for chronic low-back pain

    Nicholas Henschke;Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Maurits W. van Tulder;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen

  • Psychological therapies for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

    Christopher Eccleston;Tonya M Palermo;Amanda C de C Williams;Amy Lewandowski

  • Facing others in pain: the effects of empathy.

    Liesbet Goubert;K. D. Craig;Tine Vervoort;S. Morley

  • Behavioral Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain : A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group

    Maurits W. Van Tulder;Raymond Ostelo;T. Johan W. S. Vlaeyen;Steven J. Linton

  • Cognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration.

    Tamar Pincus;Stephen Morley

  • Randomized controlled trials of psychological therapies for management of chronic pain in children and adolescents: an updated meta-analytic review.

    Tonya M. Palermo;Christopher Eccleston;Amy S. Lewandowski;Amanda C de C. Williams

  • The Psychological Flexibility Model: A Basis for Integration and Progress in Psychological Approaches to Chronic Pain Management

    Lance M. McCracken;Stephen Morley

  • Cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain: what works for whom?

    Johan W. S. Vlaeyen;Stephen Morley

  • Systematic review of outpatient services for chronic pain control.

    H J McQuay;R A Moore;Christopher Eccleston;S Morley

  • Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jeffrey M. Lackner;Christina Mesmer;Stephen Morley;Clare Dowzer

  • Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of psychological therapy for chronic pain in children and adolescents, with a subset meta-analysis of pain relief.

    Christopher Eccleston;Stephen Morley;Amanda Williams;Louise Yorke

  • Memory for pain: a review

    Aleda Erskine;Stephen Morley;Shirley Pearce

  • The Health Anxiety Questionnaire

    Michael P. Lucock;Stephen Morley

  • Psychological approaches to chronic pain management: evidence and challenges

    C. Eccleston;S. J. Morley;A. C. de C. Williams

  • Intrathecal midazolam for the treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain: a controlled comparison with epidural steroid in a pilot study.

    Juliet M. Serrao;Ray L. Marks;Stephen J. Morley;Colin S. Goodchild

  • Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration.

    M. van Tulder;R.W.J.G. Ostelo;J.W.S. Vlaeyen;S.J. Linton

  • Estimating the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in the clinic: Evaluation of a CBT informed pain management programme

    Stephen Morley;Amanda Williams;Sumerra Hussain

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher Eccleston
Christopher Eccleston University of Bath
Chris J. Main
Chris J. Main Keele University
Amanda C. de C. Williams
Amanda C. de C. Williams University College London
Tamar Pincus
Tamar Pincus Royal Holloway University of London
Lance M. McCracken
Lance M. McCracken Uppsala University
Steven J. Linton
Steven J. Linton Örebro University
Tonya M. Palermo
Tonya M. Palermo University of Washington
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Tine Vervoort
Tine Vervoort Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in psychology or as a licensed therapist in the USA offers a range of educational and professional opportunities. Many students begin with an online psychology degree, which provides flexibility and a strong foundation in theory and practice. These programs can be a key first step toward becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC) or therapist.

If you're interested in working in major cities, requirements can vary significantly. For example, New York City licensed therapist education requirements include specific graduate coursework and supervised clinical hours. In licensed therapist requirements in Newark, candidates must complete a specialized master's degree and pass a national licensing exam.

Other areas like Norfolk licensed therapist requirements and North Las Vegas licensed therapist requirements also have state-specific criteria to ensure professionals are well-prepared to serve their communities. Researching local pathways is crucial as you plan your education and licensure journey.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Morley

Recently Published Articles