World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
7974
World Ranking
6453
National Ranking
3494

Lawrence J. Sanna publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence J. Sanna sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lawrence J. Sanna D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence J. Sanna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence J. Sanna is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States.

There is no available data on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, or awards associated with this researcher.

Best Publications

  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia: An Overview

    David L. Penn;Lawrence J. Sanna;David L. Roberts

  • Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns

    Norbert Schwarz;Lawrence J. Sanna;Ian Skurnik;Carolyn Yoon

  • He's Skilled, She's Lucky: A Meta-Analysis of Observers' Attributions for Women's and Men's Successes and Failures

    Janet Kay Swim;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Social problem solving: Theory, research, and training.

    Edward C. Chang;Thomas J. D'Zurilla;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Optimism, pessimism, and positive and negative affectivity in middle-aged adults: a test of a cognitive-affective model of psychological adjustment

    Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • SELF-ESTEEM AND SOCIAL PROBLEM SOLVING AS PREDICTORS OF AGGRESSION IN COLLEGE STUDENTS

    Thomas J. D'zurilla;Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight.

    Lawrence J. Sanna;Norbert Schwarz;Shevaun L. Stocker

  • Psychological sequelae of childhood sexual abuse: abuse-related characteristics, coping strategies, and attributional style

    Jennifer Steel;Lawrence Sanna;Barbara Hammond;James Whipple

  • Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence

    Lawrence J. Sanna;Kandi Jo Turley

  • Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: do Easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events?

    Edward C. Chang;Kiyoshi Asakawa;Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking.

    Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Optimism, pessimism, and positive and negative affectivity in middle-aged adults: A test of a cognitive-affective model of psychological adjustment.

    Unknown

  • Loneliness and negative life events as predictors of hopelessness and suicidal behaviors in Hispanics: evidence for a diathesis-stress model.

    Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna;Jameson K. Hirsch;Elizabeth L. Jeglic

  • Self-efficacy theory : implications for social facilitation and social loafing

    Lawrence J. Sanna

  • Debiasing the hindsight bias: The role of accessibility experiences and (mis)attributions

    Lawrence J Sanna;Norbert Schwarz

  • Integrating Temporal Biases The Interplay of Focal Thoughts and Accessibility Experiences

    Lawrence J. Sanna;Norbert Schwarz

  • Optimism, pessimism, affectivity, and psychological adjustment in US and Korea: a test of a mediation model

    Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna;Kye Min Yang

  • Judgments over time : the interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors

    Lawrence J. Sanna;Edward C. Chang

  • Defensive Pessimism and Optimism: The Bitter-Sweet Influence of Mood on Performance and Prefactual and Counterfactual Thinking

    Unknown

  • Mood, self-esteem, and simulated alternatives: thought-provoking affective influences on counterfactual direction.

    Lawrence J. Sanna;Kandi Jo Turley-Ames;Susanne Meier

  • Mental Simulation, Affect, and Personality: A Conceptual Framework

    Lawrence J. Sanna

  • NEGATIVE ATTRIBUTIONAL STYLE AS A MODERATOR OF THE LINK BETWEEN PERFECTIONISM AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS: PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE FOR AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL

    Edward C. Chang;Lawrence J. Sanna

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward C. Chang
Edward C. Chang University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Thomas J. D'Zurilla
Thomas J. D'Zurilla Stony Brook University
Melvin M. Mark
Melvin M. Mark Pennsylvania State University
Jameson K. Hirsch
Jameson K. Hirsch East Tennessee State University
Elizabeth L. Jeglic
Elizabeth L. Jeglic John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Adam D. Galinsky
Adam D. Galinsky Columbia University
David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Neal J. Roese
Neal J. Roese Northwestern University
Janet K. Swim
Janet K. Swim Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can help expand your career options. Many professionals use psychology degrees as a foundation for specialized roles such as school counselors, mental health counselors, and educational psychologists. Online psychology programs are flexible and widely available, making them a convenient option for those balancing school, work, or family commitments.

Career pathways in school counseling are especially popular. Requirements to enter this field vary by state, so it’s important to research the specific steps in your area. For example, if you’re interested in working in the Pacific Northwest, you can review how to become a school counselor in Oregon. If you plan to work on the East Coast, read about how to become a school counselor in Pennsylvania or Rhode Island school counselor certification requirements. Additionally, those considering the South can learn more about the requirements to be a school counselor in South Carolina.

By understanding these requirements and choosing a relevant online degree, you can position yourself for a rewarding and impactful psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence J. Sanna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles