World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
107
Citations
31946
World Ranking
926
National Ranking
369

Eckard Münck publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckard Münck sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 310 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Eckard Münck D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckard Münck sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Eckard Münck is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their academic focus and contributions have been recognized within the scientific community, notably with the award of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1997.

Though specific details about their research topics, subfields, or main fields of study are not listed, Münck's association with Carnegie Mellon University suggests involvement in advanced research activities typical of this institution.

Information on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications is not provided. This absence limits a detailed exploration of Münck's research outputs and collaborative networks.

The recognition by the AAAS as a fellow reflects a level of professional acknowledgment and membership within a significant scientific organization, indicating a career with notable contributions or impact in their field.

Best Publications

  • Iron-Sulfur Clusters: Nature's Modular, Multipurpose Structures

    Helmut Beinert;Richard H. Holm;Eckard Münck

  • Crystallographic and spectroscopic characterization of a nonheme Fe(IV)-O complex.

    Jan Uwe Rohde;Jun Hee In;Jun Hee In;Mi Hee Lim;Mi Hee Lim;William W. Brennessel

  • An Fe2IVO2 Diamond Core Structure for the Key Intermediate Q of Methane Monooxygenase

    Lijin Shu;Jeremy C. Nesheim;Karl Kauffmann;Eckard Münck

  • Nonheme FeIVO complexes that can oxidize the C-H bonds of cyclohexane at room temperature.

    József Kaizer;Eric J. Klinker;Na Young Oh;Jan Uwe Rohde

  • Chemical and Spectroscopic Evidence for an FeV-Oxo Complex

    Filipe Tiago de Oliveira;Arani Chanda;Deboshri Banerjee;Xiaopeng Shan

  • Aqueous FeIV==O: spectroscopic identification and oxo-group exchange.

    Oleg Pestovsky;Sebastian Stoian;Emile L. Bominaar;Xiaopeng Shan

  • Iron-sulfur cluster disassembly in the FNR protein of Escherichia coli by O2: [4Fe-4S] to [2Fe-2S] conversion with loss of biological activity

    Natalia Khoroshilova;Codrina Popescu;Eckard Münck;Helmut Beinert

  • A Transient Intermediate of the Methane Monooxygenase Catalytic Cycle Containing an FeIVFeIV Cluster

    Sang Kyu Lee;Brian G. Fox;Wayne A. Froland;John D. Lipscomb

  • Synthesis and comparative reactivity and electronic structural features of [MFe3S4]z+ cubane-type clusters (M = iron, cobalt, nickel)

    Jian Zhou;Michael J. Scott;Zhengguo Hu;Gang Peng

  • An FeIV=O complex of a tetradentate tripodal nonheme ligand.

    Mi Hee Lim;Mi Hee Lim;Jan Uwe Rohde;Audria Stubna;Michael R. Bukowski

  • Stearoyl-acyl carrier protein delta 9 desaturase from Ricinus communis is a diiron-oxo protein.

    Brian G. Fox;John Shanklin;Chris Somerville;Eckard Munck

  • Purification and characterization of the Rieske iron-sulfur protein from Thermus thermophilus. Evidence for a [2Fe-2S] cluster having non-cysteine ligands.

    J A Fee;K L Findling;T Yoshida;R Hille

  • End-on and side-on peroxo derivatives of non-heme iron complexes with pentadentate ligands: models for putative intermediates in biological iron/dioxygen chemistry.

    Gerard Roelfes;Vladislav Vrajmasu;Kui Chen;Raymond Y.N. Ho

  • A HIGH-VALENT NONHEME IRON INTERMEDIATE. STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF FE2(MU -O)2(5-ME-TPA)2(CLO4)3

    Yanhong Dong;Hiroshi Fujii;Michael P. Hendrich;Randolph A. Leising

  • A thiolate-ligated nonheme oxoiron(IV) complex relevant to cytochrome P450.

    Michael R. Bukowski;Michael R. Bukowski;Kevin D. Koehntop;Kevin D. Koehntop;Audria Stubna;Emile L. Bominaar

  • Evidence for a mu-oxo-bridged binuclear iron cluster in the hydroxylase component of methane monooxygenase. Mössbauer and EPR studies.

    B G Fox;K K Surerus;E Münck;J D Lipscomb

  • Mössbauer studies of alkane ω-hydroxylase: Evidence for a diiron cluster in an integral-membrane enzyme

    John Shanklin;Catalina Achim;Hermann Schmidt;Brian G. Fox

  • Endonuclease III is an iron-sulfur protein.

    Richard P. Cunningham;Hitomi Asahara;Janet F. Bank;Charles P. Scholes

  • Million-fold activation of the [Fe2(μ-O)2] diamond core for C-H bond cleavage

    Genqiang Xue;Raymond F De Hont;Eckard Münck;Lawrence Que

  • Novel metal cluster in the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase. Spectroscopic evidence.

    J Rawlings;V K Shah;J R Chisnell;W J Brill

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence Que
Lawrence Que University of Minnesota
Emile L. Bominaar
Emile L. Bominaar Carnegie Mellon University
John D. Lipscomb
John D. Lipscomb University of Minnesota
Brian G. Fox
Brian G. Fox University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael P. Hendrich
Michael P. Hendrich Carnegie Mellon University
Richard H. Holm
Richard H. Holm Harvard University
Paul A. Lindahl
Paul A. Lindahl Texas A&M University
Terrence J. Collins
Terrence J. Collins Carnegie Mellon University
Isabel Moura
Isabel Moura Universidade Nova de Lisboa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse career pathways, including interdisciplinary fields like forensic science. For those interested in the application of chemistry to crime solving, exploring forensic science careers can provide valuable insights into job roles and required skills.

Many students consider online education as a flexible and cost-effective option. Understanding how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help budget for further specialization, especially if combining chemistry knowledge with legal or investigative fields.

A great starting point could be a 2 year criminal justice degree online, which offers foundational knowledge and can be a stepping stone to more advanced roles that utilize chemistry expertise.

Additionally, those interested in legal support roles may explore various degrees for paralegals. With a chemistry background, paralegal professionals can specialize in areas like intellectual property or environmental law, highlighting the versatility of chemistry-related education in the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Eckard Münck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles