World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Laurence J. Miller

Laurence J. Miller

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
22093
World Ranking
3927
National Ranking
1939

Laurence J. Miller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence J. Miller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 425 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Laurence J. Miller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence J. Miller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurence J. Miller is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, neuroscience, and medicine. Within these broad domains, they focus extensively on molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their main research topics include receptor mechanisms and signaling, neuropeptides and animal physiology, diabetes treatment and management, lipid membrane structure and behavior, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, peptidase inhibition and analysis, as well as pancreatic function and diabetes.

Notable recent papers authored by Laurence J. Miller cover a range of topics in molecular and cellular biology and endocrinology. These include:

  • Differential GLP-1R Binding and Activation by Peptide and Non-peptide Agonists, 2020, Molecular Cell
  • Single-molecule FRET imaging of GPCR dimers in living cells, 2021, Nature Methods
  • Activation of the GLP-1 receptor by a non-peptidic agonist, 2020, Nature
  • Structure of an AMPK complex in an inactive, ATP-bound state, 2021, Science
  • Structure and Dynamics of Adrenomedullin Receptors AM1 and AM2 Reveal Key Mechanisms in the Control of Receptor Phenotype by Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins, 2020, ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science

Laurence J. Miller frequently publishes in venues such as the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE, SLAS DISCOVERY, PLoS Biology, Nature Communications, and Frontiers in Endocrinology. These publications collectively indicate sustained engagement with pharmacology, molecular biology, and endocrinology research communities.

  • IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE
  • SLAS DISCOVERY
  • PLoS Biology
  • Nature Communications
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology

Collaborative work is a notable element of their research profile. Frequent co-authors include researchers such as Kaleeckal G. Harikumar, Patrick M. Sexton, Denise Wootten, Arthur Christopoulos, and Sebastian G. B. Furness. These collaborations suggest active involvement in interdisciplinary and collective research efforts within the domain of receptor and signaling studies.

  • Kaleeckal G. Harikumar
  • Patrick M. Sexton
  • Denise Wootten
  • Arthur Christopoulos
  • Sebastian G. B. Furness

Best Publications

  • Seven Transmembrane Receptors as Shapeshifting Proteins: The Impact of Allosteric Modulation and Functional Selectivity on New Drug Discovery

    Terry P. Kenakin;Laurence J. Miller

  • International Union of Pharmacology. XXXV. The Glucagon Receptor Family

    Kelly E. Mayo;Laurence J. Miller;Dominique Bataille;Stéphane Dalle

  • Study of recurrence after surgical resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

    Suresh T. Chari;Dhiraj Yadav;Thomas C. Smyrk;Eugene P. DiMagno

  • Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR–G-protein complex

    Yi Lynn Liang;Maryam Khoshouei;Mazdak Radjainia;Yan Zhang

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 and its class B G protein-coupled receptors: A long march to therapeutic successes

    Chris de Graaf;Dan Donnelly;Denise Wootten;Jesper Lau

  • THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22: G protein-coupled receptors

    Stephen P.H. Alexander;Arthur Christopoulos;Anthony P. Davenport;Eamonn Kelly

  • Dysmotility of the small intestine in irritable bowel syndrome.

    J E Kellow;S F Phillips;L J Miller;A R Zinsmeister

  • Enteric neuronal autoantibodies in pseudoobstruction with small-cell lung carcinoma.

    Vanda A. Lennon;Vanda A. Lennon;Daryl F. Sas;Daryl F. Sas;Michael F. Busk;Michael F. Busk;Bernd Scheithauer;Bernd Scheithauer

  • Dual pathways of internalization of the cholecystokinin receptor.

    Belinda F. Roettger;Ronald U. Rentsch;Delia Pinon;Eileen Holicky

  • Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonist-bound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex.

    Yi Lynn Liang;Maryam Khoshouei;Alisa Glukhova;Sebastian G.B. Furness

  • Allosteric Ligands of the Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor (GLP-1R) Differentially Modulate Endogenous and Exogenous Peptide Responses in a Pathway-Selective Manner: Implications for Drug Screening

    Cassandra Koole;Denise Wootten;John Simms;Celine Valant

  • Polar transmembrane interactions drive formation of ligand-specific and signal pathway-biased family B G protein-coupled receptor conformations

    Denise Laura Wootten;John Watson Simms;Laurence J Miller;Arthur Christopoulos

  • Secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors : Members of a unique family of G protein-coupled receptors

    Charles D. Ulrich;Martin Holtmann;Laurence J. Miller

  • Antagonist-stimulated internalization of the G protein-coupled cholecystokinin receptor.

    B. F. Roettger;D. Ghanekar;R. Rao;C. Toledo

  • Critical contributions of amino-terminal extracellular domains in agonist binding and activation of secretin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptors. Studies of chimeric receptors.

    Martin H. Holtmann;Elizabeth M. Hadac;Laurence J. Miller

  • GR 38032F (Ondansetron), a selective 5HT3 receptor antagonist, slows colonic transit in healthy man

    N. J. Talley;S. F. Phillips;A. Haddad;L. J. Miller

  • Cryo-EM structure of the active, G s -protein complexed, human CGRP receptor

    Yi Lynn Liang;Maryam Khoshouei;Maryam Khoshouei;Giuseppe Deganutti;Alisa Glukhova

  • Serine-Arginine Protein Kinase 1 Overexpression Is Associated with Tumorigenic Imbalance in Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways in Breast, Colonic, and Pancreatic Carcinomas

    Gregory M. Hayes;Patricia E. Carrigan;Laurence J. Miller

  • Molecular and functional heterogeneity of cholangiocytes from rat liver after bile duct ligation.

    Gianfranco Alpini;Charles Ulrich;Stuart Roberts;John O. Phillips

  • 3.3 angstrom phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonist-bound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex

    Y.L. Liang;M. Khoshouei;A. Glukhova;S.G.B. Furness

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick M. Sexton
Patrick M. Sexton Monash University
Denise Wootten
Denise Wootten Monash University
Arthur Christopoulos
Arthur Christopoulos Monash University
Ruben Abagyan
Ruben Abagyan University of California, San Diego
Vay Liang W. Go
Vay Liang W. Go University of California, Los Angeles
H. Eric Xu
H. Eric Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Herbert Y. Gaisano
Herbert Y. Gaisano University of Toronto
Karsten Melcher
Karsten Melcher Van Andel Institute
Ming-Wei Wang
Ming-Wei Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Laurence J. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles