World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 68 7675 7079 3499 3145 363 20974

Terry P. Kenakin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Terry P. Kenakin between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Terry P. Kenakin published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2009. 28 of the 401 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2009. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 12 publications
1974 2025

401 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Terry P. Kenakin: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 5
1981 4
1982 6
1983 2
1984 3
1985 6
1986 1
1987 4
1988 2
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 9
1996 5
1997 4
1998 4
1999 4
2000 7
2001 8
2002 11
2003 8
2004 6
2005 9
2006 22
2007 7
2008 9
2009 24
2010 10
2011 7
2012 19
2013 7
2014 24
2015 14
2016 13
2017 24
2018 18
2019 13
2020 4
2021 11
2022 18
2023 6
2024 16
2025 12
Total 401
Download as CSV

Terry P. Kenakin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry P. Kenakin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 357–366 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 363 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196 363
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Terry P. Kenakin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terry P. Kenakin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814 68
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Terry P. Kenakin is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected disciplines with a focus on the biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying receptor function and signaling.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

The subfields in which they have contributed include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

The primary topics of research are centered around:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects

Recent publications authored by or involving Terry P. Kenakin include:

  • Virtual discovery of melatonin receptor ligands to modulate circadian rhythms (2020), published in Nature
  • Community guidelines for GPCR ligand bias: IUPHAR review 32 (2022), published in British Journal of Pharmacology
  • Neurotensin Receptor Allosterism Revealed in Complex with a Biased Allosteric Modulator (2023), published in Biochemistry
  • The function and allosteric control of the human sweet taste receptor (2020), published in Advances in Pharmacology
  • Interdependent allosteric free fatty acid receptor 2 modulators synergistically induce functional selective activation and desensitization in neutrophils (2020), published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research

Frequent co-authors associated with this researcher include:

  • Bryan L. Roth
  • Xi-Ping Huang
  • Hye Jin Kang
  • B. Krumm
  • Susruta Majumdar

The scientist has published extensively, with many publications accessible through UNC Libraries and contributions appearing repeatedly in journals such as the British Journal of Pharmacology and Biochemistry. Their work often involves molecular and pharmacological characterization of receptor behavior and ligand interactions, highlighting an emphasis on computational approaches and experimental pharmacology.

Best Publications

  • G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing

    Arthur Christopoulos;Terry Kenakin

  • Agonist-receptor efficacy II: agonist trafficking of receptor signals

    Terry Kenakin

  • Seven Transmembrane Receptors as Shapeshifting Proteins: The Impact of Allosteric Modulation and Functional Selectivity on New Drug Discovery

    Terry P. Kenakin;Laurence J. Miller

  • Signalling bias in new drug discovery: detection, quantification and therapeutic impact

    Terrence Peter Kenakin;Arthur Christopoulos

  • International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification. XXXVIII. Update on Terms and Symbols in Quantitative Pharmacology

    Richard R. Neubig;Michael Spedding;Terry Kenakin;Arthur Christopoulos

  • Functional Selectivity and Biased Receptor Signaling

    Terry Kenakin

  • Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation

    Terry Kenakin

  • Principles: receptor theory in pharmacology.

    Terry Kenakin

  • Physiological effects of inverse agonists in transgenic mice with myocardial overexpression of the β2-adrenoceptor

    R A Bond;P Leff;T D Johnson;C A Milano

  • A simple method for quantifying functional selectivity and agonist bias.

    Terry Kenakin;Christian Watson;Vanessa Muniz-Medina;Arthur Christopoulos

  • Ligand-selective receptor conformations revisited: the promise and the problem.

    Terry Kenakin

  • Drug Efficacy at G Protein–Coupled Receptors

    Terry Kenakin

  • New Concepts in Drug Discovery: Collateral Efficacy and Permissive Antagonism

    Terry Kenakin

  • The classification of seven transmembrane receptors in recombinant expression systems.

    Terry Kenakin

  • Functional selectivity through protean and biased agonism: who steers the ship?

    Terry P Kenakin

  • Efficacy at g-protein-coupled receptors

    Terry Kenakin

  • Biased signalling and allosteric machines: new vistas and challenges for drug discovery

    Terry P Kenakin

  • Efficacy as a vector: the relative prevalence and paucity of inverse agonism.

    Terry Kenakin

  • Collateral efficacy in drug discovery: taking advantage of the good (allosteric) nature of 7TM receptors.

    Terry Kenakin

  • The Cubic Ternary Complex Receptor-Occupancy Model III. Resurrecting Efficacy

    Jack M. Weiss;Paul H. Morgan;Michael W. Lutz;Terry P. Kenakin

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur Christopoulos
Arthur Christopoulos Monash University
Jenny L. Wiley
Jenny L. Wiley RTI International
Xi Ping Huang
Xi Ping Huang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Brian K. Shoichet
Brian K. Shoichet University of California, San Francisco
Luc Maroteaux
Luc Maroteaux Université Paris Cité
Evi Kostenis
Evi Kostenis University of Bonn
Jenny L. Wiley
Jenny L. Wiley Research Triangle Park Foundation
Jian Jin
Jian Jin Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Claes Dahlgren
Claes Dahlgren University of Gothenburg
Jianjun Cheng
Jianjun Cheng University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA, a variety of online degree options offer new ways to advance your education and career. Many professionals are choosing flexible programs designed for busy schedules, opening up opportunities in rapidly growing areas of healthcare and science.

For example, if you’re interested in advanced nursing roles, you can explore a doctor of nursing practice degree online, sometimes without clinical hours required. If healthcare leadership or administration is your goal, consider earning an online phd in healthcare management. Both programs can be a perfect next step for biochemistry and biology graduates aiming for leadership.

Students looking to combine chemistry with patient care might be interested in pharmacy. Accredited pharmd online programs allow you to advance your expertise while balancing work and study commitments.

If your focus is human performance or physical health, an exercise science degree online can help you build a career in fitness, rehab, or wellness fields. These pathways demonstrate how Biology and Biochemistry lay a strong foundation for diverse and rewarding career options.

Best Scientists Citing Terry P. Kenakin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles