World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 38 8563 8219 527 515 60 6906

Martin Worbes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Worbes between 1984 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Worbes published across 41 years, from 1984 to 2024, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2003. 1 of the 61 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2003. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1984 2024

61 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Worbes: publications per year, 1984 to 2024
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 1
2001 2
2002 4
2003 7
2004 3
2005 2
2006 7
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 3
2014 0
2015 2
2016 3
2017 1
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 61
Download as CSV

Martin Worbes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Worbes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 60 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62 60
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Worbes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Worbes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265 38
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Worbes is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with particular attention to subfields including Forestry, Ecology, and Animal Science and Zoology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably African Botany and Ecology Studies, Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies, and subjects related to rabbits, including nutrition, reproduction, and health.

Among their recent scholarly contributions is a paper titled Mast fruiting in a large tropical African legume tree provides evidence for the nutrient resource limitation hypothesis, published in 2023 in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

  • David M. Newbery
  • Sarah Schwan
  • George B. Chuyong
  • Godlove A. Neba
  • Culbertson E. Etta

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics – a brief history and an outlook to future challenges

    Martin Worbes

  • Annual growth rings, rainfall‐dependent growth and long‐term growth patterns of tropical trees from the Caparo Forest Reserve in Venezuela

    Martin Worbes

  • How to Measure Growth Dynamics in Tropical Trees a Review

    Martin Worbes

  • Tree species composition and diversity gradients in white‐water forests across the Amazon Basin

    Florian Wittmann;Jochen Schöngart;Juan Carlos Montero;Thomas Motzer

  • Phenology and stem-growth periodicity of tree species in Amazonian floodplain forests

    Jochen Schöngart;Maria Teresa F. Piedade;Sabine Ludwigshausen;Viviana Horna

  • On the dynamics, floristic subdivision and geographical distribution of varzea forests in Central Amazonia

    Martin Worbes;Hans Klinge;Juan D. Revilla;Christopher Martius

  • Teleconnection between tree growth in the Amazonian floodplains and the El Nino-Southern Oscillation effect.

    Jochen Schöngart;Wolfgang J. Junk;Maria Teresa F. Piedade;José Marcio Ayres

  • Tree ring analysis reveals age structure, dynamics and wood production of a natural forest stand in Cameroon

    M. Worbes;R. Staschel;A. Roloff;W. J. Junk

  • Growth Rings, Increment and Age of Trees in Inundation Forests, Savannas and a Mountain Forest in the Neotropics

    Martin Worbes

  • Age and Long-term Growth of Trees in an Old-growth Tropical Rain Forest, Based on Analyses of Tree Rings and 14C1

    Esther Fichtler;Deborah A. Clark;Martin Worbes

  • Wood growth patterns of Macrolobium acaciifolium (Benth.) Benth. (Fabaceae) in Amazonian black-water and white-water floodplain forests.

    Jochen Schöngart;Maria Teresa F. Piedade;Florian Wittmann;Wolfgang J. Junk

  • Dating tropical trees by means of 14C from bomb tests

    Martin Worbes;Wolfgang J. Junk

  • Climatic signals in tree rings of Burkea africana and Pterocarpus angolensis from semiarid forests in Namibia

    Esther Fichtler;Valerie Trouet;Hans Beeckman;Pol Coppin

  • Climate–growth relationships of tropical tree species in West Africa and their potential for climate reconstruction

    Jochen Schöngart;Bettina Orthmann;Klaus Josef Hennenberg;Stefan Porembski

  • Annual growth rings and long-term growth patterns of mangrove trees from the Bragança peninsula, North Brazil

    M. Menezes;U. Berger;M. Worbes

  • Climate–growth relationships of the dominant tree species from semi-arid savanna woodland in Ethiopia

    Aster Gebrekirstos;Ralph Mitlöhner;Demel Teketay;Martin Worbes

  • Climate seasonality limits leaf carbon assimilation and wood productivity in tropical forests

    Fabien H. Wagner;Bruno Hérault;Damien Bonal;Clément Stahl;Clément Stahl

  • Wood anatomical variables in tropical trees and their relation to site conditions and individual tree morphology

    Esther Fichtler;Martin Worbes

  • Assessing the potential of trees for afforestation of degraded landscapes in the Aral Sea Basin of Uzbekistan.

    A. Khamzina;J. P. A. Lamers;M. Worbes;E. Botman

  • How old are tropical trees? The persistence of a myth.

    Martin Worbes;Wolfgang Johannes Junk

  • Wood growth patterns of Macrolobium acaciifolium (Benth.) Benth. (Fabaceae) in Amazonian black-water and white-water

    August-Thienemann Strasse;Piedade J. Sch;M. Worbes

Frequent Co-Authors

Jochen Schöngart
Jochen Schöngart National Institute of Amazonian Research
Wolfgang J. Junk
Wolfgang J. Junk Max Planck Society
Maria Teresa Fernandez Piedade
Maria Teresa Fernandez Piedade National Institute of Amazonian Research
John P. A. Lamers
John P. A. Lamers University of Bonn
Florian Wittmann
Florian Wittmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Christopher Martius
Christopher Martius Center for International Forestry Research, Germany
Kaiyu Guan
Kaiyu Guan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Clément Stahl
Clément Stahl INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Paul L. G. Vlek
Paul L. G. Vlek University of Bonn
Hans Beeckman
Hans Beeckman Royal Museum for Central Africa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students find that choosing an easy bachelor's degree path with relevant specializations can help balance workload while gaining essential knowledge in the field.

Programs focusing on Earth systems such as geology are gaining popularity. Students looking to deepen their understanding can consider enrolling in the online geology programs, which offer flexible learning options critical for today’s dynamic job market.

With the increasing use of technology in environmental analysis, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are highly sought after. To build expertise, learners should explore the best GIS programs in the US, combining spatial data knowledge with environmental insights.

Additionally, for those aspiring to leadership roles in environmental policy or management, an accelerated administrative degree can be valuable. The 1 year MPA online programs provide a fast-track path to developing skills in public administration tailored for environmental professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Worbes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles