World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 30 1186 1073 38 37 121 3812

Barbara Vis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Barbara Vis between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Barbara Vis published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2013. 5 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1981 2025

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Barbara Vis: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 4
2007 5
2008 3
2009 9
2010 6
2011 5
2012 9
2013 23
2014 8
2015 7
2016 9
2017 7
2018 6
2019 7
2020 2
2021 7
2022 4
2023 1
2024 3
2025 2
Total 130
Download as CSV

Barbara Vis publications per year - data summary

  • Barbara Vis, a Political Science scholar from Utrecht University, has 130 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981 and 2023, with 1 publication each.
  • 23 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.9 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 17 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1996-2010: 29 publications (1.9 per year); 2011-2025: 100 publications (6.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Barbara Vis publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Vis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–125 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 121 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73 121
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Barbara Vis publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Barbara Vis, a Political Science scholar from Utrecht University, records 121 publications - the 48th percentile of the discipline.
  • 48% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Barbara Vis, and about 52% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Barbara Vis falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Barbara Vis D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Vis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96 30
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Barbara Vis D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Barbara Vis, a Political Science scholar from Utrecht University, records 30 D-Index - the 45th percentile of the discipline.
  • 45% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Barbara Vis, and about 55% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Barbara Vis ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Overview

Barbara Vis is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and specializes in the social sciences, with a particular focus on political science and international relations. Their research spans a range of topics including electoral systems and political participation, qualitative comparative analysis research, and employment and welfare studies. Additional research interests cover policy transfer and learning, sustainability and climate change governance, as well as decision-making and behavioral economics.

The frequent publication venues for Barbara Vis include the European Political Science Review, Quality & Quantity, Political Behavior, Political Studies Review, and Perspectives on Politics. These venues reflect a concentration on political science and qualitative methodological approaches.

Barbara Vis's recent scholarly contributions include papers such as:

  • "The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications" (2021, Perspectives on Politics)
  • "Conducting quantitative studies with the participation of political elites: best practices for designing the study and soliciting the participation of political elites" (2020, Quality & Quantity)
  • "Three strategies to track configurations over time with Qualitative Comparative Analysis" (2020, European Political Science Review)
  • "Digitalization as a policy response to social acceleration: Comparing democratic problem solving in Denmark and the Netherlands" (2022, Government Information Quarterly)
  • "Politicians, the Representativeness Heuristic and Decision-Making Biases" (2020, Political Behavior)

The scientist collaborates regularly with other researchers, including Sjoerd Stolwijk, Jonas Tallberg, Stefan Verweij, Carlos Closa, and Matt Qvortrup. These frequent co-authors indicate an active engagement in joint research projects and a focus on interdisciplinary approaches within political science and social sciences.

Barbara Vis has contributed extensively to subfields within social sciences, including political science and international relations, sociology and political science, general health professions, global and planetary change, and general decision sciences. Their work often integrates methodological perspectives, notably qualitative comparative analysis, alongside applied political and social topics.

Best Publications

  • The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-n analyses

    Barbara Vis

  • Why and how do Political Actors Pursue Risky Reforms

    Barbara Vis;Kees van Kersbergen

  • Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives

    Gijs Schumacher;Catherine E. de Vries;Barbara Vis

  • Politics of Risk-Taking: Welfare State Reform in Advanced Democracies

    Barbara Vis

  • To What Extent Did the Financial Crisis Intensify the Pressure to Reform the Welfare State

    Barbara Vis;Kees van Kersbergen;Thomas H. Hylands

  • Governments and unpopular social policy reform: Biting the bullet or steering clear?

    Barbara Vis

  • Political parties’ welfare image, electoral punishment and welfare state retrenchment

    Gijs Schumacher;Gijs Schumacher;Barbara Vis;Kees van Kersbergen

  • States of welfare or states of workfare? Welfare state restructuring in 16 capitalist democracies, 1985-2002

    Barbara Vis

  • Taking Stock of the Comparative Literature on the Role of Blame Avoidance Strategies in Social Policy Reform

    Barbara Vis

  • Analyzing Relationships of Necessity Not Just in Kind But Also in Degree Complementing fsQCA With NCA

    Barbara Vis;Jan Dul

  • Prospect Theory and Political Decision Making

    Barbara Vis

  • Comparative Welfare State Politics: Development, Opportunities, and Reform

    Kees van Kersbergen;Barbara Vis

  • Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory Under MPs

    Jona Linde;Barbara Vis

  • The Great Recession and Welfare State Reform: Is Retrenchment Really the Only Game Left in Town?

    Kees van Kersbergen;Barbara Vis;Anton Hemerijck

  • How Aspiration to Office Conditions the Impact of Government Participation on Party Platform Change

    Gijs Schumacher;Marc-Paul Van de Wardt;Barbara Vis;Michael Baggesen Klitgaard

  • The importance of socio-economic and political losses and gains in welfare state reform

    Barbara Vis

  • Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis

    Britta C. Brugman;Christian Burgers;Barbara Vis

  • Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative Into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    Debora de Block;Barbara Vis

  • Heuristics and Political Elites' Judgment and Decision Making

    Barbara Vis

  • The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications

    Alan M. Jacobs;Tim Büthe;Tim Büthe;Ana Arjona;Leonardo R. Arriola

  • Under which conditions does spending on active labor market policies increase? A FsQCA Analysis of 53 governments between 1985 and 2003

    Barbara Vis

  • TOWARDS AN OPEN FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO WELFARE STATE CHANGE: PRESSURES, IDEAS, AND BLAME AVOIDANCE

    Barbara Vis;Kees Van Kersbergen

  • Three worlds’ typology: Moving beyond normal science?:

    Kees van Kersbergen;Barbara Vis

  • Do miracles exist? Analyzing economic performance comparatively

    Barbara Vis;Jaap Woldendorp;Hans Keman

  • European welfare states in motion

    A.C. Hemerijck;V. Dräbing;B. Vis;M.L. Nelson

  • To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state

    B. Vis;C.J. van Kersbergen;T. Hylands

Frequent Co-Authors

Kees van Kersbergen
Kees van Kersbergen Aarhus University
Erik Bleich
Erik Bleich Middlebury College
Kimberly J. Morgan
Kimberly J. Morgan George Washington University
Jonas Tallberg
Jonas Tallberg Stockholm University
Hans Keman
Hans Keman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Zachary Elkins
Zachary Elkins The University of Texas at Austin
Mark A. Pollack
Mark A. Pollack Temple University
Anton Hemerijck
Anton Hemerijck European University Institute
Christian Burgers
Christian Burgers University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science can open up numerous online education and career opportunities. Many students start with flexible programs like the cheapest online interdisciplinary studies degree. These programs are budget-friendly, broad, and allow you to tailor coursework toward political or social science interests.

For those seeking advanced expertise, the online history MA degrees provide a solid foundation for research, teaching, or public policy roles. If time is a factor, you might consider the shortest masters degree programs online to accelerate your career—some can be finished in as little as a year.

Career-focused certifications are also valuable. There are easy certifications to get online that pay well, covering skills from project management to data analysis. These credentials can quickly boost your employability across government, non-profits, and corporate roles related to Political Science.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara Vis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles