World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 32 2638 2490 1034 955 79 5636

Stav Fainshmidt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stav Fainshmidt between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stav Fainshmidt published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2017. 14 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2017. 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
2011 2025

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stav Fainshmidt: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 2
2012 3
2013 4
2014 6
2015 3
2016 8
2017 10
2018 3
2019 7
2020 7
2021 9
2022 4
2023 7
2024 7
2025 7
Total 87
Download as CSV

Stav Fainshmidt publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stav Fainshmidt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 75–79 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 79 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83 79
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Stav Fainshmidt D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stav Fainshmidt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171 32
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Stav Fainshmidt is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Business, Management and Accounting, with a total of 68 publications in the field. Their work spans several subfields including Strategy and Management, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The scientist has contributed significantly to several topics, including:

  • International Business and FDI
  • Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Family Business Performance and Succession
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Corruption and Economic Development

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of World Business (6 publications)
  • Journal of Management Studies (4 publications)
  • Academy of Management Proceedings (3 publications)
  • Journal of International Business Studies (2 publications)
  • Long Range Planning (2 publications)

Among their recent papers are:

  • "The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research," 2020, Journal of International Business Studies
  • "Our Board, Our Rules: Nonconformity to Global Corporate Governance Norms," 2021, Administrative Science Quarterly
  • "Cycles of de-internationalization and re-internationalization: Towards an integrative framework," 2021, Journal of World Business
  • "Women on Boards of Directors: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Roles of Organizational Leadership and National Context for Gender Equality," 2020, Journal of Business and Psychology
  • "The S-shaped relationship between open innovation and financial performance: A longitudinal perspective using a novel text-based measure," 2023, Research Policy

Stav Fainshmidt frequently collaborates with several co-authors including:

  • Daniel S. Andrews (15 collaborations)
  • Ajai Gaur (6 collaborations)
  • Mark R. Mallon (5 collaborations)
  • Michael A. Witt (3 collaborations)
  • Ruth V. Aguilera (3 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension

    M. Lance Frazier;Stav Fainshmidt;Ryan L. Klinger;Amir Pezeshkan

  • Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Extension

    Stav Fainshmidt;Amir Pezeshkan;M. Lance Frazier;Anil Nair

  • Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries

    Stav Fainshmidt;William Q. Judge;Ruth V. Aguilera;Ruth V. Aguilera;Adam Smith

  • The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research

    Stav Fainshmidt;Michael A Witt;Ruth V Aguilera;Ruth V Aguilera;Alain Verbeke;Alain Verbeke;Alain Verbeke

  • When do Dynamic Capabilities Lead to Competitive Advantage? The Importance of Strategic Fit

    Stav Fainshmidt;Lucas Wenger;Amir Pezeshkan;Mark R. Mallon

  • An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities–performance relationship

    Amir Pezeshkan;Stav Fainshmidt;Anil Nair;M. Lance Frazier

  • What Facilitates Dynamic Capabilities? The Role of Organizational Climate for Trust

    Stav Fainshmidt;M. Lance Frazier

  • Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale

    M. Lance Frazier;Paul D. Johnson;Stav Fainshmidt

  • Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality

    William Q Judge;Stav Fainshmidt;J Lee Brown

  • Voice Climate, Work Outcomes, and the Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment A Multilevel Examination

    M. Lance Frazier;Stav Fainshmidt

  • Beyond tokenism: How strategic leaders influence more meaningful gender diversity on boards of directors

    Orhun Guldiken;Mark R. Mallon;Stav Fainshmidt;William Q. Judge

  • Enterprise Risk Management as a Dynamic Capability: A test of its effectiveness during a crisis

    Anil Nair;Elzotbek Rustambekov;Michael McShane;Stav Fainshmidt

  • Cycles of De-Internationalization and Re-Internationalization: Towards an Integrative Framework

    Mario Kafouros;S. Tamer Cavusgil;Timothy M. Devinney;Panagiotis Ganotakis

  • MNE performance during a crisis: An evolutionary perspective on the role of dynamic managerial capabilities and industry context

    Stav Fainshmidt;Anil Nair;Mark R. Mallon

  • Does board independence influence financial performance in IPO firms? The moderating role of the national business system

    Alessandro Zattoni;Michael A. Witt;William Q. Judge;Till Talaulicar

  • Corporate governance and IPO underpricing in a cross-national sample: A multilevel knowledge-based view

    William Q. Judge;Michael A. Witt;Alessandro Zattoni;Till Talaulicar

  • Innovation in India: A review of past research and future directions

    Anil Nair;Orhun Guldiken;Stav Fainshmidt;Amir Pezeshkan

  • Women on Boards of Directors: A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Roles of Organizational Leadership and National Context for Gender Equality

    Cynthia Saldanha Halliday;Samantha C. Paustian-Underdahl;Stav Fainshmidt

  • Subsidiary autonomy and subsidiary performance: A meta-analysis

    Jose-Mauricio Galli Geleilate;Daniel S. Andrews;Stav Fainshmidt

  • Antecedents and Outcomes of Political Tie Intensity: Institutional and Strategic Fit Perspectives

    George O. White;Stav Fainshmidt;Tazeeb Rajwani

  • Women in Upper Echelons of Management, Tenure and Legal Risk

    Shuji Bao;Stav Fainshmidt;Anil Nair;Veselina Vracheva

Frequent Co-Authors

William Q. Judge
William Q. Judge Old Dominion University
Ruth V. Aguilera
Ruth V. Aguilera Northeastern University
Alessandro Zattoni
Alessandro Zattoni Guido Carli Free International University for Social Studies
Sheila M. Puffer
Sheila M. Puffer Northeastern University
Yves Fassin
Yves Fassin Ghent University
Alain Verbeke
Alain Verbeke University of Calgary
Ajai S. Gaur
Ajai S. Gaur Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Tazeeb Rajwani
Tazeeb Rajwani University of Surrey
Timothy M. Devinney
Timothy M. Devinney University of Manchester
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Business and Management opens up many flexible, affordable online study options. Many students are looking at specialized tracks to suit their career ambitions, such as construction management, executive leadership, or data-driven decision making.

If you are interested in project coordination in the building industry, review the construction management degree cost to find budget-friendly programs. For working professionals aiming for high-level positions, an affordable online executive mba could help you advance without putting your career on hold.

If you want to further your education but are conscious of tuition expenses, explore cheap online master's programs in business and related fields. For those keen to blend management with analytics, a cheap online masters degree in data science can open doors to dynamic careers in business intelligence and decision support.

By choosing the right online degree, you can tailor your learning to your interests and career goals while staying mindful of both flexibility and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Stav Fainshmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles