World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
42
Citations
13056
World Ranking
1460
National Ranking
617

William Q. Judge publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Q. Judge sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 129 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

William Q. Judge D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Q. Judge sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Q. Judge is affiliated with Old Dominion University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Business, Management and Accounting as well as Engineering. Within these broader areas, their work includes subfields such as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Radiation, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their research topics cover a diverse range, involving Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Family Business Performance and Succession, Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, Economic Theory and Institutions, Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism, and Natural Resources and Economic Development.

Relevant recurring publication venues for their work include ECS Meeting Abstracts, Management and Organization Review, Nature Communications, Journal of Management Studies, and Venture Capital.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by William Q. Judge highlight a combination of organizational and technical themes:

  • Institutional Systems for Equitable Wealth Creation: Replication and an Update of Judge et al. (2014), 2020, Management and Organization Review
  • Deep learning at the edge enables real-time streaming ptychographic imaging, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Corporate governance in immigrant-founded entrepreneurial firms: ownership heterogeneity and firm performance, 2023, Venture Capital
  • Entrepreneurial Orientation and Underconformity to Female Board Representation Norms, 2024, Journal of Management Studies
  • Deep learning at the edge enables real-time streaming ptychographic imaging, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

William Q. Judge has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Stav Fainshmidt, Anakha V Babu, Saugat Kandel, Tekin Biçer, and Zhengchun Liu.

Best Publications

  • Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process.

    William Q. Judge;Carl P. Zeithaml

  • Total Quality Management Implementation and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Structural Control and Exploration

    Thomas J. Douglas;William Q. Judge

  • Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment

    William Q. Judge;Thomas J. Douglas

  • Strategic leadership and executive innovation influence: an international multi-cluster comparative study

    Detelin S. Elenkov;William Judge;Peter Wright

  • Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts.

    William Q. Judge;Alex Miller

  • DIVERSIFICATION AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM COMPLEMENTARITY: IS PERFORMANCE IMPROVED BY MERGING SIMILAR OR DISSIMILAR TEAMS?

    Hema A. Krishnan;Alex Miller;William Q. Judge

  • Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries

    Stav Fainshmidt;William Q. Judge;Ruth V. Aguilera;Ruth V. Aguilera;Adam Smith

  • The New Task of R&D Management: Creating Goal-Directed Communities for Innovation

    William Q. Judge;Gerald E. Fryxell;Robert S. Dooley

  • National Adoption of International Accounting Standards: An Institutional Perspective

    William Judge;Shaomin Li;Robert Pinsker

  • The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, by Edith T. Penrose. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959 (Book Review)

    Anil Nair;Joseph Trendowski;William Judge

  • Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: an empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms

    William Q. Judge;Detelin Elenkov

  • Institutional Antecedents of Corporate Governance Legitimacy

    William Q. Judge;Thomas J. Douglas;Ali M. Kutan

  • Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: an empirical study☆

    William Q Judge;Irina Naoumova;Nadejda Koutzevol

  • Organizational change capacity: the systematic development of a scale

    William Judge;Thomas Douglas

  • Corporate Governance Deviance

    Ruth V. Aguilera;William Q. Judge;Siri A. Terjesen

  • Using information-processing theory to understand planning/performance relationships in the context of strategy

    Patrick R. Rogers;Alex Miller;William Q. Judge

  • Strategic Alliance Outcomes: a Transaction‐Cost Economics Perspective

    William Q. Judge;Robert Dooley

  • The antecedents and effects of national corruption: A meta-analysis

    William Q. Judge;D. Brian McNatt;Weichu Xu

  • Belaboring the Not-So-Obvious: Consensus, Commitment, and Strategy Implementation Speed and Success

    Robert S. Dooley;Gerald E. Fryxell;William Q. Judge

  • Antecedents of Shareholder Activism in Target Firms: Evidence from a Multi-Country Study

    William Q. Judge;Ajai Gaur;Maureen I. Muller-Kahle

  • Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality

    William Q Judge;Stav Fainshmidt;J Lee Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Zattoni
Alessandro Zattoni Guido Carli Free International University for Social Studies
Stav Fainshmidt
Stav Fainshmidt Florida International University
Ruth V. Aguilera
Ruth V. Aguilera Northeastern University
Sheila M. Puffer
Sheila M. Puffer Northeastern University
Yves Fassin
Yves Fassin Ghent University
Siri Terjesen
Siri Terjesen Florida Atlantic University
Ali M. Kutan
Ali M. Kutan Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Igor Filatotchev
Igor Filatotchev King's College London
Peter Wright
Peter Wright University of Memphis
Gregory H. Dobbins
Gregory H. Dobbins University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Business and Management, there are a range of related online degrees that can help you broaden your career options. One popular direction is healthcare administration, a field that blends business skills with the fast-growing healthcare industry. You can find a health administration degree online, offering flexibility and affordability for students seeking to start or advance a career in health services.

For those aiming for leadership roles, a healthcare administration masters can provide deeper expertise and open doors to senior positions in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Business students might also consider an accounting degree online. This pathway is essential for careers in finance, auditing, or corporate management—areas in constant demand across industries.

Lastly, technology is shaping the future of business, making an artificial intelligence degree online an exciting option. Gaining expertise in AI can lead to innovative roles that merge management with cutting-edge tech solutions.

Best Scientists Citing William Q. Judge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles