World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
50
Citations
9938
World Ranking
995
National Ranking
148

Keith W. Glaister publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith W. Glaister sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 169 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Keith W. Glaister D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith W. Glaister sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the British Academy of Management

Overview

Keith W. Glaister was affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their academic work focused primarily on Business, Management, and Accounting, with a total of 11 publications in this broad field.

Their research covered several subfields, including Strategy and Management, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. The most prominent areas were Strategy and Management, contributing to seven publications, and Accounting with three publications.

Key topics explored in their research included Innovation and Knowledge Management, Corporate Finance and Governance, and International Business and Foreign Direct Investment. Other notable topics involved Corruption and Economic Development, Culture, Economy, and Development Studies, Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis, and Business Strategy and Innovation.

The scientist's recent papers included the following:

  • National culture, corporate governance and corruption: A cross-country analysis, 2020, International Journal of Finance & Economics
  • Revisiting the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: The Moderating Effects of Market Sensing and Responsiveness, 2020, British Journal of Management
  • Absorptive capacity and organizational performance in an emerging market context: Evidence from the banking industry in Turkey, 2021, Journal of Business Research
  • Exploring the internationalization strategies of Turkish multinationals: A multi-perspective analysis, 2020, Journal of International Management
  • Ownership Type, Home-Country Government-Directed Investment Policies and Firm Value in Strategic Sectors: Evidence from Chinese Acquiring Firms, 2021, British Journal of Management

The most frequent publication venues included the British Journal of Management, International Journal of Finance & Economics, Journal of Business Research, Journal of International Management, and PsycTESTS Dataset.

Frequent collaborators in their research were Ekrem Tatoğlu, Abderaouf Bouguerra, Kamel Mellahi, Agyenim Boateng, and Mathew Hughes.

The scientist's work was recognized by their election as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom and as a Fellow of the British Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Strategic Motives For International Alliance Formation

    Keith W. Glaister;Peter J. Buckley

  • Strategic Planning: Still Going Strong?

    Keith W Glaister;J.Richard Falshaw

  • Breaking the frame: an analysis of strategic cognition and decision making under uncertainty

    Gerard P. Hodgkinson;Nicola J. Bown;A. John Maule;Keith W. Glaister

  • Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention

    Mohammad Faisal Ahammad;Shlomo Yedidia Tarba;Yipeng Liu;Keith W. Glaister

  • Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs' ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market

    Mehmet Demirbag;Keith W. Glaister;Ekrem Tatoglu

  • Evidence on formal strategic planning and company performance

    J. Richard Falshaw;Keith W. Glaister;Ekrem Tatoglu

  • Measures of Performance in UK International Alliances

    Keith W. Glaister;Peter J. Buckley

  • Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging Regions

    Mehmet Demirbag;Keith W. Glaister

  • Equity-based entry modes of emerging country multinationals: lessons from Turkey

    Mehmet Demirbag;Ekrem Tatoglu;Keith W. Glaister

  • A CAUSAL ANALYSIS OF FORMAL STRATEGIC PLANNING AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM AN EMERGING COUNTRY

    Keith W. Glaister;Omer Dincer;Ekrem Tatoglu;Mehmet Demirbag

  • Motives and partner selection criteria in international strategic alliances: Perspectives of Chinese firms

    Li Dong;Keith W. Glaister

  • Performance Relationships in UK International Alliances

    Keith W. Glaister

  • Performance Relationships in UK International Alliances

    Keith W. Glaister

  • Factors affecting perceptions of the choice between acquisition and greenfield entry: The case of Western FDI in an emerging market

    Mehmet Demirbag;Ekrem Tatoglu;Keith W. Glaister

  • The effect of leadership style on talent retention during Merger and Acquisition integration: evidence from China

    Jiali Zhang;Mohammad Faisal Ahammad;Shlomo Tarba;Cary L. Cooper

  • Knowledge Accession and Knowledge Acquisition in Strategic Alliances: The Impact of Supplementary and Complementary Dimensions

    Peter Buckley;Keith Glaister;Elko Klijn;Hui Meng Tan

  • Strategic agility and human resource management

    Mohammad F. Ahammad;Keith W. Glaister;Emanuel Gomes

  • Task and Partner-related Selection Criteria in UK International Joint Ventures

    Keith W. Glaister

  • Succession Planning in Family-owned Businesses Evidence from Turkey

    Ekrem Tatoglu;Veysel Kula;Keith W. Glaister

  • Performance of international joint ventures: evidence for West Africa

    Agyenim Boateng;Keith W. Glaister

  • Resource determinants of strategy and performance: The case of British exporters

    Elena Beleska-Spasova;Keith W. Glaister;Chris Stride

Frequent Co-Authors

Ekrem Tatoglu
Ekrem Tatoglu Gulf University for Science & Technology
Mehmet Demirbag
Mehmet Demirbag University of Essex
Peter J. Buckley
Peter J. Buckley University of Manchester
Kamel Mellahi
Kamel Mellahi University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Shlomo Y. Tarba
Shlomo Y. Tarba University of Birmingham
Agyenim Boateng
Agyenim Boateng Leeds Beckett University
Byung Il Park
Byung Il Park Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Geoffrey Wood
Geoffrey Wood University of Western Ontario
Yaakov Weber
Yaakov Weber College of Management Academic Studies
Gerard P. Hodgkinson
Gerard P. Hodgkinson University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for skilled business professionals grows, online education offers flexible and practical routes to earn your degree. One popular choice is enrolling in fast track programs, which allow you to complete your studies more quickly and enter the workforce sooner. These accelerated options are ideal for those eager to advance or change their careers without spending extra years in school.

For budget-conscious students, finding the cheapest online business management degree can make higher education more accessible. Many accredited institutions offer reputable programs at a fraction of the usual cost, making it easier to balance financial concerns with educational goals.

Business and management skills are also valuable in the healthcare sector. Professionals looking to specialize may consider an online health administration degree. For those seeking advanced leadership roles, an mha degree (Master of Health Administration) can open doors to executive opportunities in hospitals, clinics, and health systems.

Exploring these online pathways can help you align your education with your career goals, whether you aim to lead in business or healthcare management.

Best Scientists Citing Keith W. Glaister

Recently Published Articles