World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 121 468 416 200 162 535 68022
Biology and Biochemistry 121 598 534 383 335 416 68304

Brian K. Shoichet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian K. Shoichet between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian K. Shoichet published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2002. 48 of the 598 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2002. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 47 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 32 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 34 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 31 publications
1989 2025

598 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian K. Shoichet: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 7
1999 6
2000 4
2001 13
2002 47
2003 16
2004 12
2005 25
2006 32
2007 21
2008 34
2009 39
2010 24
2011 7
2012 21
2013 34
2014 28
2015 25
2016 17
2017 19
2018 12
2019 10
2020 14
2021 27
2022 17
2023 24
2024 17
2025 31
Total 598
Download as CSV

Brian K. Shoichet publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian K. Shoichet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 535 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185 535
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian K. Shoichet D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian K. Shoichet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37 121
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brian K. Shoichet is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. A significant number of their publications focus on molecular biology, computational theory and mathematics, organic chemistry, infectious diseases, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their work covers a range of specialized topics, including:

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Click Chemistry and Applications

Brian K. Shoichet has contributed to several recent scientific papers that highlight their involvement in studies related to SARS-CoV-2 as well as computational methods in drug discovery and receptor biology. Notable papers include:

  • The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (2020), published in Cell
  • A practical guide to large-scale docking (2021), published in Nature Protocols
  • A SARS-CoV-2-Human Protein-Protein Interaction Map Reveals Drug Targets and Potential Drug-Repurposing (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Structure of a Hallucinogen-Activated Gq-Coupled 5-HT2A Serotonin Receptor (2020), published in Cell
  • Efficient Exploration of Chemical Space with Docking and Deep Learning (2021), published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors who have contributed to many joint publications, including John J. Irwin, Bryan L. Roth, Yurii S. Moroz, Stefan Gahbauer, and Xi-Ping Huang.

Their publications are often found in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
  • Science
  • Nature Chemical Biology

Best Publications

  • A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing.

    David E. Gordon;Gwendolyn M. Jang;Mehdi Bouhaddou;Jiewei Xu

  • ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening

    John J. Irwin;Brian K. Shoichet

  • Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry

    Michael J. Keiser;Bryan L. Roth;Bryan L. Roth;Blaine N. Armbruster;Paul R Ernsberger

  • Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking

    Michael M. Mysinger;Michael Carchia;John. J. Irwin;Brian K. Shoichet

  • Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs

    Michael J. Keiser;Vincent Setola;John J. Irwin;Christian Laggner

  • Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

    Brian K. Shoichet

  • Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

    Niu Huang;Brian K. Shoichet;John J. Irwin

  • Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation

    Elaine C. Meng;Brian K. Shoichet;Irwin D. Kuntz

  • A Common Mechanism Underlying Promiscuous Inhibitors from Virtual and High-Throughput Screening

    Susan Lynne McGovern;Emilia Caselli;Emilia Caselli;Nikolaus Grigorieff;Brian K. Shoichet

  • The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

    Mehdi Bouhaddou;Danish Memon;Bjoern Meyer;Kris M. White

  • Structure-based discovery of opioid analgesics with reduced side effects

    Aashish Manglik;Henry Lin;Dipendra K. Aryal;John D. McCorvy

  • Large-scale prediction and testing of drug activity on side-effect targets

    Eugen Lounkine;Michael J. Keiser;Steven Whitebread;Dmitri Mikhailov

  • Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes

    Jiankun Lyu;Sheng Wang;Trent E. Balius;Isha Singh

  • A relationship between protein stability and protein function.

    Brian K. Shoichet;Walter A. Baase;Ryota Kuroki;Brian W. Matthews

  • The promise and peril of chemical probes.

    Cheryl H. Arrowsmith;James E. Audia;Christopher Austin;Jonathan Baell

  • Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps.

    Andrew R Leach;Brian K Shoichet;Catherine E Peishoff

  • A specific mechanism of nonspecific inhibition.

    Susan Lynne McGovern;Brian T. Helfand;Brian Feng;Brian K. Shoichet

  • Comparative host-coronavirus protein interaction networks reveal pan-viral disease mechanisms.

    David E. Gordon;Joseph Hiatt;Mehdi Bouhaddou;Veronica V. Rezelj

  • Molecular Docking and High-Throughput Screening for Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase-1B

    Thompson N. Doman;Susan L. McGovern;Bryan J. Witherbee;Thomas P. Kasten

  • Lead discovery using molecular docking

    Brian K. Shoichet;Susan Lynne McGovern;Binqing Wei;John J. Irwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Bryan L. Roth
Bryan L. Roth University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrej Sali
Andrej Sali University of California, San Francisco
Frank M. Raushel
Frank M. Raushel Texas A&M University
Ken A. Dill
Ken A. Dill Stony Brook University
Xi Ping Huang
Xi Ping Huang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Brian K. Kobilka
Brian K. Kobilka Stanford University
Irwin D. Kuntz
Irwin D. Kuntz University of California, San Francisco
Molly S. Shoichet
Molly S. Shoichet University of Toronto
Laszlo Urban
Laszlo Urban Novartis (Switzerland)
Richard Bonnet
Richard Bonnet University of Clermont Auvergne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related fields like forensic science can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals begin their journey with degrees tailored to specialized roles, such as becoming an autopsy tech. This role blends scientific knowledge with practical skills to assist in medical investigations.

One of the advantages for prospective students is the availability of affordable education options. Programs ranked among the cheapest online forensic science degree offerings provide accessible pathways to begin or advance careers without incurring heavy debt.

Graduate degrees also play a crucial role for those wanting to specialize further. For instance, an online master's in forensic psychology combines behavioral science with forensic applications, ideal for careers involving criminal profiling or counseling.

Overall, the forensic career paths linked to Chemistry provide a range of exciting roles where science meets justice. From laboratory analysis to courtroom testimony, these careers offer dynamic environments for applying chemical expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Brian K. Shoichet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles