World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter J. Montiel

Peter J. Montiel

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
52
Citations
12052
World Ranking
1256
National Ranking
759

Peter J. Montiel publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Montiel sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 267 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Peter J. Montiel D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Montiel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Montiel is affiliated with Williams College in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Social Sciences, and Business, Management and Accounting. Within these fields, their work further specializes in subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Development, Finance, Strategy and Management, and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

The scientist has contributed to a range of topics that include International Development and Aid, Global Financial Crisis and Policies, State Capitalism and Financial Governance, Economic Theory and Policy, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, Fiscal Policies and Political Economy, and Economic theories and models.

Montiel has published research in the Journal of Globalization and Development, with a notable paper titled IMF Advice on Capital Flows: How Well is it Supported by Empirical Evidence? released in 2022.

  • IMF Advice on Capital Flows: How Well is it Supported by Empirical Evidence?, 2022, Journal of Globalization and Development

Their frequent collaborators include Ralph Chami, Raphaël Espinoza, Mattia Coppo, and Thomas F. Cosimano, indicating a network involving multiple scholars within related economic and financial research areas.

The integration of diverse topics such as international development, fiscal policy, and financial governance reflects a broad approach toward understanding economic systems and policies at both national and global levels. Their publication record illustrates engagement with empirical analysis in economic policy discussions, particularly in relation to capital flows and financial sector guidance.

Best Publications

  • Do capital controls and macroeconomic policies influence the volume and composition of capital flows? Evidence from the 1990s

    Peter Montiel;Carmen M Reinhart

  • Macroeconomic Consequences of Remittances

    Connel Fullenkamp;Thomas Cosimano;Michael T. Gapen;Ralph Chami

  • Macroeconomic Consequences of Remittances

    Connel Fullenkamp;Thomas F. Cosimano;Michael T. Gapen;Ralph Chami

  • Has Latin America's post-reform growth been disappointing?

    William Easterly;Norman Loayza;Peter Montiel

  • Remittances and Institutions: Are Remittances a Curse?

    Yasser Abdih;Ralph Chami;Jihad Dagher;Peter Montiel

  • The surge in capital inflows to developing countries : an analytical overview

    Eduardo Fernández-Arias;Peter J. Montiel

  • Exchange Rate Policy in Developing Countries: Some Analytical Issues

    Peter J Montiel;Bijan B. Aghevli;Mohsin S. Khan

  • Capital Mobility in Developing Countries: Some Measurement Issues and Empirical Estimates

    Peter J. Montiel

  • Do Workers' Remittances Promote Economic Growth?

    Adolfo Barajas;Ralph Chami;Connel Fullenkamp;Michael Gapen

  • Monetary Transmission in Low-Income Countries: Effectiveness and Policy Implications

    Prachi Mishra;Peter J Montiel;Antonio Spilimbergo

  • Do Workers' Remittances Promote Economic Growth?

    Adolfo Barajas;Ralph Chami;Connel Fullenkamp;Michael Gapen

  • Macroeconomics in Emerging Markets

    Peter J. Montiel

  • Post-crisis exchange rate policy in five Asian countries: Filling in the “hollow middle”?

    Leonardo Hernández;Peter J. Montiel

  • Contractionary Devaluation in Developing Countries: An Analytical Overview

    J. Saul Lizondo;Peter J. Montiel

  • How effective is monetary transmission in low-income countries? A survey of the empirical evidence

    Prachi Mishra;Peter Montiel

  • Evaluating Fund Stabilization Programs with Multicountry Data: Some Methodological Pitfalls (Evaluation des programmes de stabilisation du Fonds à partir de données sur divers pays: quelques écueils méthodologiques) (La evaluación de los programas de estabilización del Fondo con los datos de diversos países: algunas dificultades metodológicas)

    Morris Goldstein;Peter Montiel

  • Reform and Growth in Latin America: All Pain, No Gain?

    Eduardo Fernandez-Arias;Peter Montiel

  • Consumption in Developing Countries: Tests for Liquidity Constraints and Finite Horizons

    Nadeem U. Haque;Peter Montiel

  • The Dynamics of Capital Movements to Emerging Economies During the 1990s

    Carmen Reinhart;Peter Montiel

  • The Dynamics of Capital Movements to Emerging Economies During the 1990s

    Carmen Reinhart;Peter Montiel

  • Reform and Growth in Latin America: All Pain, No Gain?

    Eduardo Fernández-Arias;Peter Montiel

  • A Macroeconometric Model for Developing Countries

    Nadeem U. Haque;Kajal Lahiri;Peter J. Montiel

  • Remittances and Institutions: Are Remittances a Curse?

    Yasser Abdih;Jihad C. Dagher;Ralph Chami;Peter J. Montiel

  • Remittances: An Automatic Output Stabilizer?

    Ralph Chami;Dalia Hakura;Peter Montiel

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Chami
Ralph Chami International Monetary Fund
Antonio Spilimbergo
Antonio Spilimbergo International Monetary Fund
Jonathan D. Ostry
Jonathan D. Ostry University of Toronto
Pierre-Richard Agénor
Pierre-Richard Agénor University of Manchester
Mohsin S. Khan
Mohsin S. Khan Institute of Development and Economic Alternatives
Luis Servén
Luis Servén Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros
Andrew Berg
Andrew Berg International Monetary Fund
Carmen M. Reinhart
Carmen M. Reinhart Harvard University
Sebastian Edwards
Sebastian Edwards University of California, Los Angeles
Eduardo Borensztein
Eduardo Borensztein Inter-American Development Bank

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and professional pathways. For those looking for flexible study options, understanding how to get a business degree online is a crucial first step. Online programs offer convenience and help working professionals balance continuing education with their careers.

Many prospective students seek affordable and accessible advanced degrees. If you're interested in leadership roles, consider the top online MBA programs no gmat requirement, which removes barriers often faced during the application process. Additionally, those seeking cost-effective education options can explore an mba under 50k to gain valuable skills without going over budget.

As industries evolve, new opportunities in digital marketing continue to emerge. Professionals looking to diversify their expertise can enroll in a digital marketing and social media degree program to expand their career prospects in the growing field of online business and communications.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Montiel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles